Cargando…

The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare—A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) has been gaining traction, particularly in hospitals. A core VBHC element is patient value, i.e., what matters most to the patient and at what cost can this be delivered. This interpretation of value implies patient engagement in patient–d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Voorden, Michael, Sipma, Wim S., de Jong, Margriet F. C., Franx, Arie, Ahaus, Kees C. T. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250089
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144027
_version_ 1785047692957712384
author van der Voorden, Michael
Sipma, Wim S.
de Jong, Margriet F. C.
Franx, Arie
Ahaus, Kees C. T. B.
author_facet van der Voorden, Michael
Sipma, Wim S.
de Jong, Margriet F. C.
Franx, Arie
Ahaus, Kees C. T. B.
author_sort van der Voorden, Michael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In recent years, Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) has been gaining traction, particularly in hospitals. A core VBHC element is patient value, i.e., what matters most to the patient and at what cost can this be delivered. This interpretation of value implies patient engagement in patient–doctor communication. Although patient engagement in direct care in the VBHC setting is well described, patient engagement at the organizational level of improving care has hardly been studied. This systematic review maps current knowledge regarding the intensity and impact of patient engagement in VBHC initiatives. We focus on the organizational level of a continuous patient engagement model. METHODS: We performed a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines using five electronic databases. The search strategy yielded 1,546 records, of which 21 studies were eligible for inclusion. Search terms were VBHC and patient engagement, or similar keywords, and we included only empirical studies in hospitals or transmural settings at the organizational level. RESULTS: We found that consultation, using either questionnaires or interviews by researchers, is the most common method to involve patients in VBHC. Higher levels of patient engagement, such as advisory roles, co-design, or collaborative teams are rare. We found no examples of the highest level of patient engagement such as patients co-leading care improvement committees. CONCLUSION: This study included 21 articles, the majority of which were observational, resulting in a limited quality of evidence. Our review shows that patient engagement at the organizational level in VBHC initiatives still relies on low engagement tools such as questionnaires and interviews. Higher-level engagement tools such as advisory roles and collaborative teams are rarely used. Higher-level engagement offers opportunities to improve healthcare and care pathways through co-design with the people being served. We urge VBHC initiatives to embrace all levels of patient engagement to ensure that patient values find their way to the heart of these initiatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10213745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102137452023-05-27 The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare—A systematic review van der Voorden, Michael Sipma, Wim S. de Jong, Margriet F. C. Franx, Arie Ahaus, Kees C. T. B. Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: In recent years, Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) has been gaining traction, particularly in hospitals. A core VBHC element is patient value, i.e., what matters most to the patient and at what cost can this be delivered. This interpretation of value implies patient engagement in patient–doctor communication. Although patient engagement in direct care in the VBHC setting is well described, patient engagement at the organizational level of improving care has hardly been studied. This systematic review maps current knowledge regarding the intensity and impact of patient engagement in VBHC initiatives. We focus on the organizational level of a continuous patient engagement model. METHODS: We performed a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines using five electronic databases. The search strategy yielded 1,546 records, of which 21 studies were eligible for inclusion. Search terms were VBHC and patient engagement, or similar keywords, and we included only empirical studies in hospitals or transmural settings at the organizational level. RESULTS: We found that consultation, using either questionnaires or interviews by researchers, is the most common method to involve patients in VBHC. Higher levels of patient engagement, such as advisory roles, co-design, or collaborative teams are rare. We found no examples of the highest level of patient engagement such as patients co-leading care improvement committees. CONCLUSION: This study included 21 articles, the majority of which were observational, resulting in a limited quality of evidence. Our review shows that patient engagement at the organizational level in VBHC initiatives still relies on low engagement tools such as questionnaires and interviews. Higher-level engagement tools such as advisory roles and collaborative teams are rarely used. Higher-level engagement offers opportunities to improve healthcare and care pathways through co-design with the people being served. We urge VBHC initiatives to embrace all levels of patient engagement to ensure that patient values find their way to the heart of these initiatives. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10213745/ /pubmed/37250089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144027 Text en Copyright © 2023 van der Voorden, Sipma, de Jong, Franx and Ahaus. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
van der Voorden, Michael
Sipma, Wim S.
de Jong, Margriet F. C.
Franx, Arie
Ahaus, Kees C. T. B.
The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare—A systematic review
title The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare—A systematic review
title_full The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare—A systematic review
title_fullStr The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare—A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare—A systematic review
title_short The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare—A systematic review
title_sort immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare—a systematic review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250089
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144027
work_keys_str_mv AT vandervoordenmichael theimmaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview
AT sipmawims theimmaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview
AT dejongmargrietfc theimmaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview
AT franxarie theimmaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview
AT ahauskeesctb theimmaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview
AT vandervoordenmichael immaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview
AT sipmawims immaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview
AT dejongmargrietfc immaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview
AT franxarie immaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview
AT ahauskeesctb immaturityofpatientengagementinvaluebasedhealthcareasystematicreview