Cargando…

Gravity-driven membrane filtration with compact second-life modules daily backwashed: An alternative to conventional ultrafiltration for centralized facilities

Gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration is a strategic alternative to conventional ultrafiltration (UF) for the resilient production of drinking water via ultrafiltration when resources become scarce, given the low dependency on energy and chemicals, and longer membrane lifetime. Implementation at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoffel, Deborah, Derlon, Nicolas, Traber, Jacqueline, Staaks, Christian, Heijnen, Martin, Morgenroth, Eberhard, Jacquin, Céline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100178
_version_ 1785047811655467008
author Stoffel, Deborah
Derlon, Nicolas
Traber, Jacqueline
Staaks, Christian
Heijnen, Martin
Morgenroth, Eberhard
Jacquin, Céline
author_facet Stoffel, Deborah
Derlon, Nicolas
Traber, Jacqueline
Staaks, Christian
Heijnen, Martin
Morgenroth, Eberhard
Jacquin, Céline
author_sort Stoffel, Deborah
collection PubMed
description Gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration is a strategic alternative to conventional ultrafiltration (UF) for the resilient production of drinking water via ultrafiltration when resources become scarce, given the low dependency on energy and chemicals, and longer membrane lifetime. Implementation at large scale requires the use of compact and low-cost membrane modules with high biopolymer removal capacity. We therefore evaluated (1) to what extent stable flux can be obtained with compact membrane modules, i.e., inside-out hollow fiber membranes, and frequent gravity-driven backwash, (2) whether we can reduce membrane expenses by effectively utilizing second-life UF modules, i.e., modules that have been discarded by treatment plant operators because they are no longer under warranty, (3) if biopolymer removal could be maintained when applying a frequent backwash and with second-life modules and (4) which GDM filtration scenarios are economically viable compared to conventional UF, when considering the influence of new or second-life modules, membrane lifetime, stable flux value and energy pricing. Our findings showed that it was possible to maintain stable fluxes around 10 L/m(2)/h with both new and second-life modules for 142 days, but a daily gravity-driven backwash was necessary and sufficient to compensate the continuous flux drop observed with compact modules. In addition, the backwash did not affect the biopolymer removal. Costs calculations revealed two significant findings: (1) using second-life modules made GDM filtration membrane investment less expensive than conventional UF, despite the higher module requirements for GDM filtration and (2) overall costs of GDM filtration with a gravity-driven backwash were unaffected by energy prices rise, while conventional UF costs rose significantly. The later increased the number of economically viable GDM filtration scenarios, including scenarios with new modules. In summary, we proposed an approach that could make GDM filtration in centralized facilities feasible and increase the range of UF operating conditions to better adapt to increasing environmental and societal constraints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10214304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102143042023-05-27 Gravity-driven membrane filtration with compact second-life modules daily backwashed: An alternative to conventional ultrafiltration for centralized facilities Stoffel, Deborah Derlon, Nicolas Traber, Jacqueline Staaks, Christian Heijnen, Martin Morgenroth, Eberhard Jacquin, Céline Water Res X Full Paper Gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration is a strategic alternative to conventional ultrafiltration (UF) for the resilient production of drinking water via ultrafiltration when resources become scarce, given the low dependency on energy and chemicals, and longer membrane lifetime. Implementation at large scale requires the use of compact and low-cost membrane modules with high biopolymer removal capacity. We therefore evaluated (1) to what extent stable flux can be obtained with compact membrane modules, i.e., inside-out hollow fiber membranes, and frequent gravity-driven backwash, (2) whether we can reduce membrane expenses by effectively utilizing second-life UF modules, i.e., modules that have been discarded by treatment plant operators because they are no longer under warranty, (3) if biopolymer removal could be maintained when applying a frequent backwash and with second-life modules and (4) which GDM filtration scenarios are economically viable compared to conventional UF, when considering the influence of new or second-life modules, membrane lifetime, stable flux value and energy pricing. Our findings showed that it was possible to maintain stable fluxes around 10 L/m(2)/h with both new and second-life modules for 142 days, but a daily gravity-driven backwash was necessary and sufficient to compensate the continuous flux drop observed with compact modules. In addition, the backwash did not affect the biopolymer removal. Costs calculations revealed two significant findings: (1) using second-life modules made GDM filtration membrane investment less expensive than conventional UF, despite the higher module requirements for GDM filtration and (2) overall costs of GDM filtration with a gravity-driven backwash were unaffected by energy prices rise, while conventional UF costs rose significantly. The later increased the number of economically viable GDM filtration scenarios, including scenarios with new modules. In summary, we proposed an approach that could make GDM filtration in centralized facilities feasible and increase the range of UF operating conditions to better adapt to increasing environmental and societal constraints. Elsevier 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10214304/ /pubmed/37250288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100178 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Paper
Stoffel, Deborah
Derlon, Nicolas
Traber, Jacqueline
Staaks, Christian
Heijnen, Martin
Morgenroth, Eberhard
Jacquin, Céline
Gravity-driven membrane filtration with compact second-life modules daily backwashed: An alternative to conventional ultrafiltration for centralized facilities
title Gravity-driven membrane filtration with compact second-life modules daily backwashed: An alternative to conventional ultrafiltration for centralized facilities
title_full Gravity-driven membrane filtration with compact second-life modules daily backwashed: An alternative to conventional ultrafiltration for centralized facilities
title_fullStr Gravity-driven membrane filtration with compact second-life modules daily backwashed: An alternative to conventional ultrafiltration for centralized facilities
title_full_unstemmed Gravity-driven membrane filtration with compact second-life modules daily backwashed: An alternative to conventional ultrafiltration for centralized facilities
title_short Gravity-driven membrane filtration with compact second-life modules daily backwashed: An alternative to conventional ultrafiltration for centralized facilities
title_sort gravity-driven membrane filtration with compact second-life modules daily backwashed: an alternative to conventional ultrafiltration for centralized facilities
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100178
work_keys_str_mv AT stoffeldeborah gravitydrivenmembranefiltrationwithcompactsecondlifemodulesdailybackwashedanalternativetoconventionalultrafiltrationforcentralizedfacilities
AT derlonnicolas gravitydrivenmembranefiltrationwithcompactsecondlifemodulesdailybackwashedanalternativetoconventionalultrafiltrationforcentralizedfacilities
AT traberjacqueline gravitydrivenmembranefiltrationwithcompactsecondlifemodulesdailybackwashedanalternativetoconventionalultrafiltrationforcentralizedfacilities
AT staakschristian gravitydrivenmembranefiltrationwithcompactsecondlifemodulesdailybackwashedanalternativetoconventionalultrafiltrationforcentralizedfacilities
AT heijnenmartin gravitydrivenmembranefiltrationwithcompactsecondlifemodulesdailybackwashedanalternativetoconventionalultrafiltrationforcentralizedfacilities
AT morgenrotheberhard gravitydrivenmembranefiltrationwithcompactsecondlifemodulesdailybackwashedanalternativetoconventionalultrafiltrationforcentralizedfacilities
AT jacquinceline gravitydrivenmembranefiltrationwithcompactsecondlifemodulesdailybackwashedanalternativetoconventionalultrafiltrationforcentralizedfacilities