Cargando…

Does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? A cross sectional pilot study

AIM: To investigate the relationship between social media use and loneliness and psychological wellbeing of youth in rural New South Wales. DESIGN: This was a web-based cross-sectional survey. METHODS: The survey consisted of 33 items including demography (12 items), participants’ social media use (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregory, Lachlan, Dutton, Tegan, Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi, Vines, Robyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04849-y
_version_ 1785047825788174336
author Gregory, Lachlan
Dutton, Tegan
Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi
Vines, Robyn
author_facet Gregory, Lachlan
Dutton, Tegan
Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi
Vines, Robyn
author_sort Gregory, Lachlan
collection PubMed
description AIM: To investigate the relationship between social media use and loneliness and psychological wellbeing of youth in rural New South Wales. DESIGN: This was a web-based cross-sectional survey. METHODS: The survey consisted of 33 items including demography (12 items), participants’ social media use (9 items), mood and anxiety (6 items), perceived loneliness (6 items), the impact of COVID-19 on social media usage or perceived loneliness (2 items). The participants’ mood and anxiety were evaluated using the psychological distress tool (K6), while loneliness was measured using the De Jong Gierveld 6-item scale. Total loneliness and psychological distress scores were compared between demographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 47 participants, aged 16–24 years took part in the study. The majority were women (68%) and many had K6 score that was indicative of psychological distress (68%). About half of the participants indicated that Facebook (FB) was their most used social media platform and two in five participants were on social media within 10 min of waking up each day, about 30% spent more than 20 h per week on social media, and more than two-third sent private messages, images, or videos, multiple times a day. The mean loneliness score was 2.89 (range, 0 to 6), with 0 being ‘not lonely’ and 6 being ‘intense social loneliness’. One-way ANOVA and χ2 test results showed that those who used FB most frequently had significantly higher mean scores for loneliness compared to those that used other social media platforms (p = 0.015). Linear regression analysis revealed that those who commonly used FB were more likely to report higher loneliness scores (coefficient = –1.45, 95%CI –2.63, –0.28, p = 0.017), while gender (p = 0.039), age (p = 0.048), household composition (p = 0.023), and education level (p = 0.014) were associated with severe psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that social media usage, particularly FB, as measured by time used and active or passive engagement with the medium, was significantly linked to loneliness, with some impact on psychological distress. Social media use within ten minutes of waking increased the likelihood of psychological distress. However, neither loneliness nor psychological distress were associated with rurality among the rural youth in this study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-04849-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10214363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102143632023-05-27 Does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? A cross sectional pilot study Gregory, Lachlan Dutton, Tegan Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi Vines, Robyn BMC Psychiatry Research AIM: To investigate the relationship between social media use and loneliness and psychological wellbeing of youth in rural New South Wales. DESIGN: This was a web-based cross-sectional survey. METHODS: The survey consisted of 33 items including demography (12 items), participants’ social media use (9 items), mood and anxiety (6 items), perceived loneliness (6 items), the impact of COVID-19 on social media usage or perceived loneliness (2 items). The participants’ mood and anxiety were evaluated using the psychological distress tool (K6), while loneliness was measured using the De Jong Gierveld 6-item scale. Total loneliness and psychological distress scores were compared between demographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 47 participants, aged 16–24 years took part in the study. The majority were women (68%) and many had K6 score that was indicative of psychological distress (68%). About half of the participants indicated that Facebook (FB) was their most used social media platform and two in five participants were on social media within 10 min of waking up each day, about 30% spent more than 20 h per week on social media, and more than two-third sent private messages, images, or videos, multiple times a day. The mean loneliness score was 2.89 (range, 0 to 6), with 0 being ‘not lonely’ and 6 being ‘intense social loneliness’. One-way ANOVA and χ2 test results showed that those who used FB most frequently had significantly higher mean scores for loneliness compared to those that used other social media platforms (p = 0.015). Linear regression analysis revealed that those who commonly used FB were more likely to report higher loneliness scores (coefficient = –1.45, 95%CI –2.63, –0.28, p = 0.017), while gender (p = 0.039), age (p = 0.048), household composition (p = 0.023), and education level (p = 0.014) were associated with severe psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that social media usage, particularly FB, as measured by time used and active or passive engagement with the medium, was significantly linked to loneliness, with some impact on psychological distress. Social media use within ten minutes of waking increased the likelihood of psychological distress. However, neither loneliness nor psychological distress were associated with rurality among the rural youth in this study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-04849-y. BioMed Central 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10214363/ /pubmed/37237363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04849-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made av0ailable in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gregory, Lachlan
Dutton, Tegan
Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi
Vines, Robyn
Does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? A cross sectional pilot study
title Does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? A cross sectional pilot study
title_full Does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? A cross sectional pilot study
title_fullStr Does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? A cross sectional pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? A cross sectional pilot study
title_short Does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? A cross sectional pilot study
title_sort does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? a cross sectional pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04849-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorylachlan doessocialmediausageamelioratelonelinessinruralyouthacrosssectionalpilotstudy
AT duttontegan doessocialmediausageamelioratelonelinessinruralyouthacrosssectionalpilotstudy
AT osuagwuuchechukwulevi doessocialmediausageamelioratelonelinessinruralyouthacrosssectionalpilotstudy
AT vinesrobyn doessocialmediausageamelioratelonelinessinruralyouthacrosssectionalpilotstudy