Cargando…
Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study
BACKGROUND: Implant design and apical stability are principal parameters involved in achieving successful primary stability. Using polyurethane models to simulate post-extraction sockets, we investigated the effects of using differing blade designs on the primary stability of tapered implants and th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02999-9 |
_version_ | 1785047888753065984 |
---|---|
author | Cavalcante, Marcelo Sales Ferraro-Bezerra, Marcelo de Barros Silva, Paulo Goberlanio Andrade, Gabriel Silva Alencar, Phillipe Nogueira Barbosa da Silva Ferreira Filho, Josfran Maia, Lucas Alexandre da Silva, Raul Anderson Domingues Alves Moreira, Danna Mota Avelar, Rafael Linard |
author_facet | Cavalcante, Marcelo Sales Ferraro-Bezerra, Marcelo de Barros Silva, Paulo Goberlanio Andrade, Gabriel Silva Alencar, Phillipe Nogueira Barbosa da Silva Ferreira Filho, Josfran Maia, Lucas Alexandre da Silva, Raul Anderson Domingues Alves Moreira, Danna Mota Avelar, Rafael Linard |
author_sort | Cavalcante, Marcelo Sales |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implant design and apical stability are principal parameters involved in achieving successful primary stability. Using polyurethane models to simulate post-extraction sockets, we investigated the effects of using differing blade designs on the primary stability of tapered implants and the impact of apical depth. METHOD: Six polyurethane blocks were used to simulate post-extraction pockets. One of the implants presented self-tapping blades (Group A), while the other (Group B) did not. Seventy-two implants were placed at 3 different depths (5 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm), and a torque wrench was used to measure the stability of the implants. RESULTS: When evaluating the implants (placed at 5 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm apical to the socket), we observed that the torque of the Group B implants was higher than that of Group A implants (P < 0.01). At the 9-mm depth, there was no difference between the groups (Drive GM 34.92 Ncm and Helix GM 32.33 Ncm) (P > 0.001), and considering the same implant groups, those placed at 7-mm and 9-mm depths presented higher torques (p < 0.01) than those placed at 5-mm (p > 0.01). CONCLUSION: Considering both groups, we concluded that an insertion depth of greater than 7 mm is needed for initial stability, and in situations involving reduced supportive bone tissue or low bone density, a non-self-tapping thread design improves implant stability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-023-02999-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10214678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102146782023-05-27 Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study Cavalcante, Marcelo Sales Ferraro-Bezerra, Marcelo de Barros Silva, Paulo Goberlanio Andrade, Gabriel Silva Alencar, Phillipe Nogueira Barbosa da Silva Ferreira Filho, Josfran Maia, Lucas Alexandre da Silva, Raul Anderson Domingues Alves Moreira, Danna Mota Avelar, Rafael Linard BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Implant design and apical stability are principal parameters involved in achieving successful primary stability. Using polyurethane models to simulate post-extraction sockets, we investigated the effects of using differing blade designs on the primary stability of tapered implants and the impact of apical depth. METHOD: Six polyurethane blocks were used to simulate post-extraction pockets. One of the implants presented self-tapping blades (Group A), while the other (Group B) did not. Seventy-two implants were placed at 3 different depths (5 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm), and a torque wrench was used to measure the stability of the implants. RESULTS: When evaluating the implants (placed at 5 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm apical to the socket), we observed that the torque of the Group B implants was higher than that of Group A implants (P < 0.01). At the 9-mm depth, there was no difference between the groups (Drive GM 34.92 Ncm and Helix GM 32.33 Ncm) (P > 0.001), and considering the same implant groups, those placed at 7-mm and 9-mm depths presented higher torques (p < 0.01) than those placed at 5-mm (p > 0.01). CONCLUSION: Considering both groups, we concluded that an insertion depth of greater than 7 mm is needed for initial stability, and in situations involving reduced supportive bone tissue or low bone density, a non-self-tapping thread design improves implant stability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-023-02999-9. BioMed Central 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10214678/ /pubmed/37231426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02999-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Cavalcante, Marcelo Sales Ferraro-Bezerra, Marcelo de Barros Silva, Paulo Goberlanio Andrade, Gabriel Silva Alencar, Phillipe Nogueira Barbosa da Silva Ferreira Filho, Josfran Maia, Lucas Alexandre da Silva, Raul Anderson Domingues Alves Moreira, Danna Mota Avelar, Rafael Linard Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study |
title | Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study |
title_full | Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study |
title_fullStr | Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study |
title_short | Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study |
title_sort | influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02999-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cavalcantemarcelosales influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy AT ferrarobezerramarcelo influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy AT debarrossilvapaulogoberlanio influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy AT andradegabrielsilva influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy AT alencarphillipenogueirabarbosa influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy AT dasilvaferreirafilhojosfran influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy AT maialucasalexandre influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy AT dasilvaraulandersondominguesalves influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy AT moreiradannamota influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy AT avelarrafaellinard influenceofdesignimplantandapicaldepthinpostextractionsocketsaninvitrosimulatedstudy |