Cargando…

New classification for bone type at dental implant sites: a dental computed tomography study

OBJECTIVE: This study proposed a new classification method of bone quantity and quality at the dental implant site using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image analysis, classifying cortical and cancellous bones separately and using CBCT for quantitative analysis. METHODS: Preoperative CBCT imag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Shiuan-Hui, Hsu, Jui-Ting, Fuh, Lih-Jyh, Peng, Shin-Lei, Huang, Heng-Li, Tsai, Ming-Tzu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03039-2
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study proposed a new classification method of bone quantity and quality at the dental implant site using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image analysis, classifying cortical and cancellous bones separately and using CBCT for quantitative analysis. METHODS: Preoperative CBCT images were obtained from 128 implant patients (315 sites). First, measure the crestal cortical bone thickness (in mm) and the cancellous bone density [in grayscale values (GV) and bone mineral density (g/cm(3))] at the implant sites. The new classification for bone quality at the implant site proposed in this study is a “nine-square division” bone classification system, where the cortical bone thickness is classified into A: > 1.1 mm, B:0.7–1.1 mm, and C: < 0.7 mm, and the cancellous bone density is classified into 1: > 600 GV (= 420 g/cm(3)), 2:300–600 GV (= 160 g/cm(3)–420 g/cm(3)), and 3: < 300 GV (= 160 g/cm(3)). RESULTS: The results of the nine bone type proportions based on the new jawbone classification were as follows: A1 (8.57%,27/315), A2 (13.02%), A3 (4.13%), B1 (17.78%), B2 (20.63%), B3 (8.57%) C1 (4.44%), C2 (14.29%), and C3 (8.57%). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed classification can complement the parts overlooked in previous bone classification methods (bone types A3 and C1). TRIAL REGISTRATION: The retrospective registration of this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, No. CMUH 108-REC2-181.