Cargando…

Myopic Versus Glaucomatous Parapapillary Beta Zone in Myopic Eyes Versus Eyes With Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma

PURPOSE: To search for histologic differences in the beta zone between myopic eyes versus eyes with secondary angle-closure glaucoma. METHODS: The histomorphometric study consisted of human eyes enucleated due to uveal melanomas or secondary angle-closure glaucoma. RESULTS: The study included 100 ey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jonas, Jost B., Jonas, Rahul A., Jonas, Shefali B., Panda-Jonas, Songhomitra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37227745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.5.25
_version_ 1785047929558401024
author Jonas, Jost B.
Jonas, Rahul A.
Jonas, Shefali B.
Panda-Jonas, Songhomitra
author_facet Jonas, Jost B.
Jonas, Rahul A.
Jonas, Shefali B.
Panda-Jonas, Songhomitra
author_sort Jonas, Jost B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To search for histologic differences in the beta zone between myopic eyes versus eyes with secondary angle-closure glaucoma. METHODS: The histomorphometric study consisted of human eyes enucleated due to uveal melanomas or secondary angle-closure glaucoma. RESULTS: The study included 100 eyes (age: 62.1 ± 15.1 years; axial length: 25.6 ± 3.1 mm; range: 20.0–35.0 mm). In non–highly myopic glaucomatous eyes compared with non–highly myopic nonglaucomatous eyes, the parapapillary alpha zone was longer (223 ± 168 µm vs. 125 ± 128 µm; P = 0.03), beta zone prevalence (15/20 vs. 6/41; P < 0.001) and length (277 ± 245 µm vs. 44 ± 150 µm; P = 0.001) were higher, and RPE cell density in the alpha zone and alpha zone border was lower (all P < 0.05). In highly myopic nonglaucomatous eyes compared with non–highly myopic glaucomatous eyes, parapapillary RPE drusen prevalence (2/19 vs. 10/10; P = 0.01) and alpha zone prevalence (2/19 vs. 16/20; P < 0.001) and length (23 ± 68 µm vs. 223 ± 168 µm; P < 0.001) were lower. In non–highly myopic glaucomatous eyes, Bruch's membrane (BM) thickness decreased (P < 0.001) from the beta zone (6.0 ± 3.1 µm) to the alpha zone (5.1 ± 4.3 µm) and peripheral to it (3.0 ± 0.9 µm). In highly myopic nonglaucomatous eyes, BM thickness did not differ (P > 0.10) between all three regions. In the total study population, RPE cell density in the alpha zone (24.5 ± 9.3 cells/240 µm) was higher than at the alpha zone border (19.2 ± 4.8 cells/240 µm; P < 0.001) or peripheral to it (19.0 ± 3.6 cells/240 µm; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The glaucomatous beta zone in eyes with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (with the alpha zone, parapapillary RPE drusen, thickened BM, and higher RPE cell count in the adjacent alpha zone) differs histologically from the myopic beta zone (characterized by the absence of the alpha zone and parapapillary RPE drusen, unremarkable BM thickness, and unremarkable parapapillary RPE). The differences suggest different etiologies of the glaucomatous versus myopic beta zone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10214867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102148672023-05-27 Myopic Versus Glaucomatous Parapapillary Beta Zone in Myopic Eyes Versus Eyes With Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Jonas, Jost B. Jonas, Rahul A. Jonas, Shefali B. Panda-Jonas, Songhomitra Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Glaucoma PURPOSE: To search for histologic differences in the beta zone between myopic eyes versus eyes with secondary angle-closure glaucoma. METHODS: The histomorphometric study consisted of human eyes enucleated due to uveal melanomas or secondary angle-closure glaucoma. RESULTS: The study included 100 eyes (age: 62.1 ± 15.1 years; axial length: 25.6 ± 3.1 mm; range: 20.0–35.0 mm). In non–highly myopic glaucomatous eyes compared with non–highly myopic nonglaucomatous eyes, the parapapillary alpha zone was longer (223 ± 168 µm vs. 125 ± 128 µm; P = 0.03), beta zone prevalence (15/20 vs. 6/41; P < 0.001) and length (277 ± 245 µm vs. 44 ± 150 µm; P = 0.001) were higher, and RPE cell density in the alpha zone and alpha zone border was lower (all P < 0.05). In highly myopic nonglaucomatous eyes compared with non–highly myopic glaucomatous eyes, parapapillary RPE drusen prevalence (2/19 vs. 10/10; P = 0.01) and alpha zone prevalence (2/19 vs. 16/20; P < 0.001) and length (23 ± 68 µm vs. 223 ± 168 µm; P < 0.001) were lower. In non–highly myopic glaucomatous eyes, Bruch's membrane (BM) thickness decreased (P < 0.001) from the beta zone (6.0 ± 3.1 µm) to the alpha zone (5.1 ± 4.3 µm) and peripheral to it (3.0 ± 0.9 µm). In highly myopic nonglaucomatous eyes, BM thickness did not differ (P > 0.10) between all three regions. In the total study population, RPE cell density in the alpha zone (24.5 ± 9.3 cells/240 µm) was higher than at the alpha zone border (19.2 ± 4.8 cells/240 µm; P < 0.001) or peripheral to it (19.0 ± 3.6 cells/240 µm; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The glaucomatous beta zone in eyes with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (with the alpha zone, parapapillary RPE drusen, thickened BM, and higher RPE cell count in the adjacent alpha zone) differs histologically from the myopic beta zone (characterized by the absence of the alpha zone and parapapillary RPE drusen, unremarkable BM thickness, and unremarkable parapapillary RPE). The differences suggest different etiologies of the glaucomatous versus myopic beta zone. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10214867/ /pubmed/37227745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.5.25 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Glaucoma
Jonas, Jost B.
Jonas, Rahul A.
Jonas, Shefali B.
Panda-Jonas, Songhomitra
Myopic Versus Glaucomatous Parapapillary Beta Zone in Myopic Eyes Versus Eyes With Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
title Myopic Versus Glaucomatous Parapapillary Beta Zone in Myopic Eyes Versus Eyes With Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
title_full Myopic Versus Glaucomatous Parapapillary Beta Zone in Myopic Eyes Versus Eyes With Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
title_fullStr Myopic Versus Glaucomatous Parapapillary Beta Zone in Myopic Eyes Versus Eyes With Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Myopic Versus Glaucomatous Parapapillary Beta Zone in Myopic Eyes Versus Eyes With Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
title_short Myopic Versus Glaucomatous Parapapillary Beta Zone in Myopic Eyes Versus Eyes With Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
title_sort myopic versus glaucomatous parapapillary beta zone in myopic eyes versus eyes with secondary angle-closure glaucoma
topic Glaucoma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37227745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.5.25
work_keys_str_mv AT jonasjostb myopicversusglaucomatousparapapillarybetazoneinmyopiceyesversuseyeswithsecondaryangleclosureglaucoma
AT jonasrahula myopicversusglaucomatousparapapillarybetazoneinmyopiceyesversuseyeswithsecondaryangleclosureglaucoma
AT jonasshefalib myopicversusglaucomatousparapapillarybetazoneinmyopiceyesversuseyeswithsecondaryangleclosureglaucoma
AT pandajonassonghomitra myopicversusglaucomatousparapapillarybetazoneinmyopiceyesversuseyeswithsecondaryangleclosureglaucoma