Cargando…

Juvenile obesity in terms of various evaluation methods

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a civilization disease of the 21(st) century. The prevalence of obesity and overweight among children and adolescents is constantly increasing. BMI (body mass index) and WHR (waist to hip ratio) are methods of obesity assessment recommended by the WHO. Also, the WtHR (waist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chabowska, Gabriela, Czyżewski, Marek, Barg, Ewa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848472
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pedm.2022.116111
_version_ 1785047945469493248
author Chabowska, Gabriela
Czyżewski, Marek
Barg, Ewa
author_facet Chabowska, Gabriela
Czyżewski, Marek
Barg, Ewa
author_sort Chabowska, Gabriela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a civilization disease of the 21(st) century. The prevalence of obesity and overweight among children and adolescents is constantly increasing. BMI (body mass index) and WHR (waist to hip ratio) are methods of obesity assessment recommended by the WHO. Also, the WtHR (waist to height ratio), which takes into account height, is one of the most popular methods of diagnosing childhood obesity. A more recent diagnostic indicator is the FMI (fat mass index), which considers the percentage of the patient's body fat. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: was to compare the methods of assessing obesity in children and adolescents using the following indicators: BMI, WHR, WtHR, and FMI and to determine the consistency of the results obtained with them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 195 children aged 11–18 years, from whom the following data were collected: height, weight, waist circumference, and percentage of body fat. The calculated indices (BMI, WHR, WtHR, FMI), expressed in SDS, were compared using the Bland-Altman test, Passing-Bablok regression, and the slope chart. RESULTS: The fewest diagnoses of obesity were shown by FMI SDS (15.9%) and the highest by WHR SDS (28.7%). WHR SDS showed the least consistent results with BMI SDS. Significant statistical differences were found between BMI SDS and both FMI SDS and WtHR SDS. CONCLUSIONS: BMI, as the most acceptable obesity indicator, can be used as a screening method for assessing obesity. However, patients with boundary BMI values should be examined more precisely, using more than one index. FMI is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10214939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102149392023-06-05 Juvenile obesity in terms of various evaluation methods Chabowska, Gabriela Czyżewski, Marek Barg, Ewa Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Original paper | Praca oryginalna INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a civilization disease of the 21(st) century. The prevalence of obesity and overweight among children and adolescents is constantly increasing. BMI (body mass index) and WHR (waist to hip ratio) are methods of obesity assessment recommended by the WHO. Also, the WtHR (waist to height ratio), which takes into account height, is one of the most popular methods of diagnosing childhood obesity. A more recent diagnostic indicator is the FMI (fat mass index), which considers the percentage of the patient's body fat. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: was to compare the methods of assessing obesity in children and adolescents using the following indicators: BMI, WHR, WtHR, and FMI and to determine the consistency of the results obtained with them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 195 children aged 11–18 years, from whom the following data were collected: height, weight, waist circumference, and percentage of body fat. The calculated indices (BMI, WHR, WtHR, FMI), expressed in SDS, were compared using the Bland-Altman test, Passing-Bablok regression, and the slope chart. RESULTS: The fewest diagnoses of obesity were shown by FMI SDS (15.9%) and the highest by WHR SDS (28.7%). WHR SDS showed the least consistent results with BMI SDS. Significant statistical differences were found between BMI SDS and both FMI SDS and WtHR SDS. CONCLUSIONS: BMI, as the most acceptable obesity indicator, can be used as a screening method for assessing obesity. However, patients with boundary BMI values should be examined more precisely, using more than one index. FMI is recommended. Termedia Publishing House 2022-06-28 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10214939/ /pubmed/35848472 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pedm.2022.116111 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to download and share its works but not commercially purposes or to create derivative works.
spellingShingle Original paper | Praca oryginalna
Chabowska, Gabriela
Czyżewski, Marek
Barg, Ewa
Juvenile obesity in terms of various evaluation methods
title Juvenile obesity in terms of various evaluation methods
title_full Juvenile obesity in terms of various evaluation methods
title_fullStr Juvenile obesity in terms of various evaluation methods
title_full_unstemmed Juvenile obesity in terms of various evaluation methods
title_short Juvenile obesity in terms of various evaluation methods
title_sort juvenile obesity in terms of various evaluation methods
topic Original paper | Praca oryginalna
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848472
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pedm.2022.116111
work_keys_str_mv AT chabowskagabriela juvenileobesityintermsofvariousevaluationmethods
AT czyzewskimarek juvenileobesityintermsofvariousevaluationmethods
AT bargewa juvenileobesityintermsofvariousevaluationmethods