Cargando…

Can Cold Atmospheric Plasma Be Used for Infection Control in Burns? A Preclinical Evaluation

Wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication and is responsible for higher rates of mortality in burn patients. Because of the resistance of PA to many antibiotics and antiseptics, an effective treatment is difficult. As a possible alternative, cold atmospheric plasma (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagheri, Mahsa, von Kohout, Maria, Zoric, Andreas, Fuchs, Paul C., Schiefer, Jennifer L., Opländer, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10215252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051239
_version_ 1785048019704479744
author Bagheri, Mahsa
von Kohout, Maria
Zoric, Andreas
Fuchs, Paul C.
Schiefer, Jennifer L.
Opländer, Christian
author_facet Bagheri, Mahsa
von Kohout, Maria
Zoric, Andreas
Fuchs, Paul C.
Schiefer, Jennifer L.
Opländer, Christian
author_sort Bagheri, Mahsa
collection PubMed
description Wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication and is responsible for higher rates of mortality in burn patients. Because of the resistance of PA to many antibiotics and antiseptics, an effective treatment is difficult. As a possible alternative, cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) can be considered for treatment, as antibacterial effects are known from some types of CAP. Hence, we preclinically tested the CAP device PlasmaOne and found that CAP was effective against PA in various test systems. CAP induced an accumulation of nitrite, nitrate, and hydrogen peroxide, combined with a decrease in pH in agar and solutions, which could be responsible for the antibacterial effects. In an ex vivo contamination wound model using human skin, a reduction in microbial load of about 1 log(10) level was observed after 5 min of CAP treatment as well as an inhibition of biofilm formation. However, the efficacy of CAP was significantly lower when compared with commonly used antibacterial wound irrigation solutions. Nevertheless, a clinical use of CAP in the treatment of burn wounds is conceivable on account of the potential resistance of PA to common wound irrigation solutions and the possible wound healing-promoting effects of CAP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10215252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102152522023-05-27 Can Cold Atmospheric Plasma Be Used for Infection Control in Burns? A Preclinical Evaluation Bagheri, Mahsa von Kohout, Maria Zoric, Andreas Fuchs, Paul C. Schiefer, Jennifer L. Opländer, Christian Biomedicines Article Wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication and is responsible for higher rates of mortality in burn patients. Because of the resistance of PA to many antibiotics and antiseptics, an effective treatment is difficult. As a possible alternative, cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) can be considered for treatment, as antibacterial effects are known from some types of CAP. Hence, we preclinically tested the CAP device PlasmaOne and found that CAP was effective against PA in various test systems. CAP induced an accumulation of nitrite, nitrate, and hydrogen peroxide, combined with a decrease in pH in agar and solutions, which could be responsible for the antibacterial effects. In an ex vivo contamination wound model using human skin, a reduction in microbial load of about 1 log(10) level was observed after 5 min of CAP treatment as well as an inhibition of biofilm formation. However, the efficacy of CAP was significantly lower when compared with commonly used antibacterial wound irrigation solutions. Nevertheless, a clinical use of CAP in the treatment of burn wounds is conceivable on account of the potential resistance of PA to common wound irrigation solutions and the possible wound healing-promoting effects of CAP. MDPI 2023-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10215252/ /pubmed/37238910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051239 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bagheri, Mahsa
von Kohout, Maria
Zoric, Andreas
Fuchs, Paul C.
Schiefer, Jennifer L.
Opländer, Christian
Can Cold Atmospheric Plasma Be Used for Infection Control in Burns? A Preclinical Evaluation
title Can Cold Atmospheric Plasma Be Used for Infection Control in Burns? A Preclinical Evaluation
title_full Can Cold Atmospheric Plasma Be Used for Infection Control in Burns? A Preclinical Evaluation
title_fullStr Can Cold Atmospheric Plasma Be Used for Infection Control in Burns? A Preclinical Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Can Cold Atmospheric Plasma Be Used for Infection Control in Burns? A Preclinical Evaluation
title_short Can Cold Atmospheric Plasma Be Used for Infection Control in Burns? A Preclinical Evaluation
title_sort can cold atmospheric plasma be used for infection control in burns? a preclinical evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10215252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051239
work_keys_str_mv AT bagherimahsa cancoldatmosphericplasmabeusedforinfectioncontrolinburnsapreclinicalevaluation
AT vonkohoutmaria cancoldatmosphericplasmabeusedforinfectioncontrolinburnsapreclinicalevaluation
AT zoricandreas cancoldatmosphericplasmabeusedforinfectioncontrolinburnsapreclinicalevaluation
AT fuchspaulc cancoldatmosphericplasmabeusedforinfectioncontrolinburnsapreclinicalevaluation
AT schieferjenniferl cancoldatmosphericplasmabeusedforinfectioncontrolinburnsapreclinicalevaluation
AT oplanderchristian cancoldatmosphericplasmabeusedforinfectioncontrolinburnsapreclinicalevaluation