Cargando…
Different Strategies Affect Enzyme Packaging into Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles
All Gram-negative bacteria are believed to produce outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), proteoliposomes shed from the outermost membrane. We previously separately engineered E. coli to produce and package two organophosphate (OP) hydrolyzing enzymes, phosphotriesterase (PTE) and diisopropylfluorophosphat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10215610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10050583 |
_version_ | 1785048104459829248 |
---|---|
author | Dean, Scott N. Thakur, Meghna Spangler, Joseph R. Smith, Aaron D. Garin, Sean P. Walper, Scott A. Ellis, Gregory A. |
author_facet | Dean, Scott N. Thakur, Meghna Spangler, Joseph R. Smith, Aaron D. Garin, Sean P. Walper, Scott A. Ellis, Gregory A. |
author_sort | Dean, Scott N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | All Gram-negative bacteria are believed to produce outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), proteoliposomes shed from the outermost membrane. We previously separately engineered E. coli to produce and package two organophosphate (OP) hydrolyzing enzymes, phosphotriesterase (PTE) and diisopropylfluorophosphatase (DFPase), into secreted OMVs. From this work, we realized a need to thoroughly compare multiple packaging strategies to elicit design rules for this process, focused on (1) membrane anchors or periplasm-directing proteins (herein “anchors/directors”) and (2) the linkers connecting these to the cargo enzyme; both may affect enzyme cargo activity. Herein, we assessed six anchors/directors to load PTE and DFPase into OMVs: four membrane anchors, namely, lipopeptide Lpp’, SlyB, SLP, and OmpA, and two periplasm-directing proteins, namely, maltose-binding protein (MBP) and BtuF. To test the effect of linker length and rigidity, four different linkers were compared using the anchor Lpp’. Our results showed that PTE and DFPase were packaged with most anchors/directors to different degrees. For the Lpp’ anchor, increased packaging and activity corresponded to increased linker length. Our findings demonstrate that the selection of anchors/directors and linkers can greatly influence the packaging and bioactivity of enzymes loaded into OMVs, and these findings have the potential to be utilized for packaging other enzymes into OMVs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10215610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102156102023-05-27 Different Strategies Affect Enzyme Packaging into Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles Dean, Scott N. Thakur, Meghna Spangler, Joseph R. Smith, Aaron D. Garin, Sean P. Walper, Scott A. Ellis, Gregory A. Bioengineering (Basel) Article All Gram-negative bacteria are believed to produce outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), proteoliposomes shed from the outermost membrane. We previously separately engineered E. coli to produce and package two organophosphate (OP) hydrolyzing enzymes, phosphotriesterase (PTE) and diisopropylfluorophosphatase (DFPase), into secreted OMVs. From this work, we realized a need to thoroughly compare multiple packaging strategies to elicit design rules for this process, focused on (1) membrane anchors or periplasm-directing proteins (herein “anchors/directors”) and (2) the linkers connecting these to the cargo enzyme; both may affect enzyme cargo activity. Herein, we assessed six anchors/directors to load PTE and DFPase into OMVs: four membrane anchors, namely, lipopeptide Lpp’, SlyB, SLP, and OmpA, and two periplasm-directing proteins, namely, maltose-binding protein (MBP) and BtuF. To test the effect of linker length and rigidity, four different linkers were compared using the anchor Lpp’. Our results showed that PTE and DFPase were packaged with most anchors/directors to different degrees. For the Lpp’ anchor, increased packaging and activity corresponded to increased linker length. Our findings demonstrate that the selection of anchors/directors and linkers can greatly influence the packaging and bioactivity of enzymes loaded into OMVs, and these findings have the potential to be utilized for packaging other enzymes into OMVs. MDPI 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10215610/ /pubmed/37237653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10050583 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dean, Scott N. Thakur, Meghna Spangler, Joseph R. Smith, Aaron D. Garin, Sean P. Walper, Scott A. Ellis, Gregory A. Different Strategies Affect Enzyme Packaging into Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles |
title | Different Strategies Affect Enzyme Packaging into Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles |
title_full | Different Strategies Affect Enzyme Packaging into Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles |
title_fullStr | Different Strategies Affect Enzyme Packaging into Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles |
title_full_unstemmed | Different Strategies Affect Enzyme Packaging into Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles |
title_short | Different Strategies Affect Enzyme Packaging into Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles |
title_sort | different strategies affect enzyme packaging into bacterial outer membrane vesicles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10215610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10050583 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deanscottn differentstrategiesaffectenzymepackagingintobacterialoutermembranevesicles AT thakurmeghna differentstrategiesaffectenzymepackagingintobacterialoutermembranevesicles AT spanglerjosephr differentstrategiesaffectenzymepackagingintobacterialoutermembranevesicles AT smithaarond differentstrategiesaffectenzymepackagingintobacterialoutermembranevesicles AT garinseanp differentstrategiesaffectenzymepackagingintobacterialoutermembranevesicles AT walperscotta differentstrategiesaffectenzymepackagingintobacterialoutermembranevesicles AT ellisgregorya differentstrategiesaffectenzymepackagingintobacterialoutermembranevesicles |