Cargando…

Noninvasive Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure from Subharmonic Scattering of Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles

The noninvasive estimation of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) using ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) microbubbles as pressure sensors will provide tumor treatments and efficacy assessments with a promising tool. This study aimed to verify the efficacy of the optimal acoustic pressure in vitro in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yun, Lu, Huimin, Huang, Laixin, Li, Deyu, Qiu, Weibao, Li, Lingling, Xu, Gang, Su, Min, Zhou, Jianhua, Li, Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37232888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13050528
_version_ 1785048206949744640
author Wang, Yun
Lu, Huimin
Huang, Laixin
Li, Deyu
Qiu, Weibao
Li, Lingling
Xu, Gang
Su, Min
Zhou, Jianhua
Li, Fei
author_facet Wang, Yun
Lu, Huimin
Huang, Laixin
Li, Deyu
Qiu, Weibao
Li, Lingling
Xu, Gang
Su, Min
Zhou, Jianhua
Li, Fei
author_sort Wang, Yun
collection PubMed
description The noninvasive estimation of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) using ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) microbubbles as pressure sensors will provide tumor treatments and efficacy assessments with a promising tool. This study aimed to verify the efficacy of the optimal acoustic pressure in vitro in the prediction of tumor IFPs based on UCA microbubbles’ subharmonic scattering. A customized ultrasound scanner was used to generate subharmonic signals from microbubbles’ nonlinear oscillations, and the optimal acoustic pressure was determined in vitro when the subharmonic amplitude reached the most sensitive to hydrostatic pressure changes. This optimal acoustic pressure was then applied to predict IFPs in tumor-bearing mouse models, which were further compared with the reference IFPs measured using a standard tissue fluid pressure monitor. An inverse linear relationship and good correlation (r = −0.853, p < 0.001) existed between the subharmonic amplitude and tumor IFPs at the optimal acoustic pressure of 555 kPa, and pressure sensitivity was 1.019 dB/mmHg. No statistical differences were found between the pressures measured by the standard device and those estimated via the subharmonic amplitude, as confirmed by cross-validation (mean absolute errors from 2.00 to 3.09 mmHg, p > 0.05). Our findings demonstrated that in vitro optimized acoustic parameters for UCA microbubbles’ subharmonic scattering can be applied for the noninvasive estimation of tumor IFPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10216054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102160542023-05-27 Noninvasive Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure from Subharmonic Scattering of Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles Wang, Yun Lu, Huimin Huang, Laixin Li, Deyu Qiu, Weibao Li, Lingling Xu, Gang Su, Min Zhou, Jianhua Li, Fei Biosensors (Basel) Article The noninvasive estimation of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) using ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) microbubbles as pressure sensors will provide tumor treatments and efficacy assessments with a promising tool. This study aimed to verify the efficacy of the optimal acoustic pressure in vitro in the prediction of tumor IFPs based on UCA microbubbles’ subharmonic scattering. A customized ultrasound scanner was used to generate subharmonic signals from microbubbles’ nonlinear oscillations, and the optimal acoustic pressure was determined in vitro when the subharmonic amplitude reached the most sensitive to hydrostatic pressure changes. This optimal acoustic pressure was then applied to predict IFPs in tumor-bearing mouse models, which were further compared with the reference IFPs measured using a standard tissue fluid pressure monitor. An inverse linear relationship and good correlation (r = −0.853, p < 0.001) existed between the subharmonic amplitude and tumor IFPs at the optimal acoustic pressure of 555 kPa, and pressure sensitivity was 1.019 dB/mmHg. No statistical differences were found between the pressures measured by the standard device and those estimated via the subharmonic amplitude, as confirmed by cross-validation (mean absolute errors from 2.00 to 3.09 mmHg, p > 0.05). Our findings demonstrated that in vitro optimized acoustic parameters for UCA microbubbles’ subharmonic scattering can be applied for the noninvasive estimation of tumor IFPs. MDPI 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10216054/ /pubmed/37232888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13050528 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Yun
Lu, Huimin
Huang, Laixin
Li, Deyu
Qiu, Weibao
Li, Lingling
Xu, Gang
Su, Min
Zhou, Jianhua
Li, Fei
Noninvasive Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure from Subharmonic Scattering of Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles
title Noninvasive Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure from Subharmonic Scattering of Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles
title_full Noninvasive Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure from Subharmonic Scattering of Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles
title_fullStr Noninvasive Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure from Subharmonic Scattering of Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure from Subharmonic Scattering of Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles
title_short Noninvasive Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure from Subharmonic Scattering of Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles
title_sort noninvasive estimation of tumor interstitial fluid pressure from subharmonic scattering of ultrasound contrast microbubbles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37232888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13050528
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyun noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles
AT luhuimin noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles
AT huanglaixin noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles
AT lideyu noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles
AT qiuweibao noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles
AT lilingling noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles
AT xugang noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles
AT sumin noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles
AT zhoujianhua noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles
AT lifei noninvasiveestimationoftumorinterstitialfluidpressurefromsubharmonicscatteringofultrasoundcontrastmicrobubbles