Cargando…

Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer—A Systematic Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: One of the main complications of cancer is delirium, especially in advanced stages. Our aim is to determine which delirium screening instrument is the most accurate in older people with cancer. A systematic review was performed on 13 different assessment tools, reporting an incidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel, Puchades-García, Andrea, Pérez-Ros, Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102807
_version_ 1785048218013270016
author Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel
Puchades-García, Andrea
Pérez-Ros, Pilar
author_facet Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel
Puchades-García, Andrea
Pérez-Ros, Pilar
author_sort Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: One of the main complications of cancer is delirium, especially in advanced stages. Our aim is to determine which delirium screening instrument is the most accurate in older people with cancer. A systematic review was performed on 13 different assessment tools, reporting an incidence of delirium ranging from 14.3% to 68.3%. The Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS) showed the best metric properties, followed by the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (NuDESC), Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). Screening tools for delirium are heterogeneous, and there is a need to analyze metric properties exclusively in the older population as knowing the tools with the greatest diagnostic accuracy will enable physicians and nurses to make the correct choice for early detection of delirium. In this way, the most appropriate measures could be implemented to avoid harmful consequences. ABSTRACT: Background: The increase in life expectancy worldwide has led to a larger population of older people, which in turn entails a rising prevalence of cancer. One of the main complications of cancer is delirium, especially in advanced stages. Objective: To determine which delirium screening instrument is the most accurate in older people with cancer. Methods: A systematic review was designed. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EBSCO and SCOPUS; additional records were identified by handsearching. Selection criteria were studies involving people with cancer and a mean sample age of 60 years or older, assessing delirium, and reporting the metric properties of the assessment instrument. Studies with post-surgical patients and substance abuse delirium were excluded. Results: From 2001 to 2021, 14 eligible studies evaluated 13 different assessment tools, reporting an incidence of delirium ranging from 14.3% to 68.3%. The Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS) showed the best metric properties, followed by the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (NuDESC), Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). Only two studies were considered to be at low risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 Tool. No study exclusively examined this population group. Conclusions: Screening tools for delirium are heterogeneous for older people with cancer, and there is a need to analyze metric properties exclusively in the older population. Registered on PROSPERO ID: CRD42022303530.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10216101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102161012023-05-27 Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer—A Systematic Review Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel Puchades-García, Andrea Pérez-Ros, Pilar Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: One of the main complications of cancer is delirium, especially in advanced stages. Our aim is to determine which delirium screening instrument is the most accurate in older people with cancer. A systematic review was performed on 13 different assessment tools, reporting an incidence of delirium ranging from 14.3% to 68.3%. The Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS) showed the best metric properties, followed by the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (NuDESC), Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). Screening tools for delirium are heterogeneous, and there is a need to analyze metric properties exclusively in the older population as knowing the tools with the greatest diagnostic accuracy will enable physicians and nurses to make the correct choice for early detection of delirium. In this way, the most appropriate measures could be implemented to avoid harmful consequences. ABSTRACT: Background: The increase in life expectancy worldwide has led to a larger population of older people, which in turn entails a rising prevalence of cancer. One of the main complications of cancer is delirium, especially in advanced stages. Objective: To determine which delirium screening instrument is the most accurate in older people with cancer. Methods: A systematic review was designed. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EBSCO and SCOPUS; additional records were identified by handsearching. Selection criteria were studies involving people with cancer and a mean sample age of 60 years or older, assessing delirium, and reporting the metric properties of the assessment instrument. Studies with post-surgical patients and substance abuse delirium were excluded. Results: From 2001 to 2021, 14 eligible studies evaluated 13 different assessment tools, reporting an incidence of delirium ranging from 14.3% to 68.3%. The Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS) showed the best metric properties, followed by the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (NuDESC), Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). Only two studies were considered to be at low risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 Tool. No study exclusively examined this population group. Conclusions: Screening tools for delirium are heterogeneous for older people with cancer, and there is a need to analyze metric properties exclusively in the older population. Registered on PROSPERO ID: CRD42022303530. MDPI 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10216101/ /pubmed/37345143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102807 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel
Puchades-García, Andrea
Pérez-Ros, Pilar
Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer—A Systematic Review
title Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer—A Systematic Review
title_full Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer—A Systematic Review
title_short Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer—A Systematic Review
title_sort accuracy of delirium screening tools in older people with cancer—a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102807
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezarnaufranciscomiguel accuracyofdeliriumscreeningtoolsinolderpeoplewithcancerasystematicreview
AT puchadesgarciaandrea accuracyofdeliriumscreeningtoolsinolderpeoplewithcancerasystematicreview
AT perezrospilar accuracyofdeliriumscreeningtoolsinolderpeoplewithcancerasystematicreview