Cargando…
p53/TP53 Status Assessment in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Despite p53 aberration, as a prognostic biomarker, still remaining a matter of debate for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), the characterization of p53/TP53 is routinely performed to assign chromosomal instability (CIN). The current gold standard for p53 assessment is immunohist...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102783 |
_version_ | 1785048234141417472 |
---|---|
author | Boldrin, Elisa Piano, Maria Assunta Bernaudo, Francesco Alfieri, Rita Biasin, Maria Raffaella Montagner, Isabella Monia Volpato, Alice Mattara, Genny Lamacchia, Francesco Magni, Giovanna Rosato, Antonio Scapinello, Antonio Pilati, Pierluigi Curtarello, Matteo |
author_facet | Boldrin, Elisa Piano, Maria Assunta Bernaudo, Francesco Alfieri, Rita Biasin, Maria Raffaella Montagner, Isabella Monia Volpato, Alice Mattara, Genny Lamacchia, Francesco Magni, Giovanna Rosato, Antonio Scapinello, Antonio Pilati, Pierluigi Curtarello, Matteo |
author_sort | Boldrin, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Despite p53 aberration, as a prognostic biomarker, still remaining a matter of debate for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), the characterization of p53/TP53 is routinely performed to assign chromosomal instability (CIN). The current gold standard for p53 assessment is immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, several studies with other tumors have demonstrated that “low” IHC staining levels should be considered as aberrant as “strong” staining due to mutated p53. We investigated the potential of molecular assays, such as droplet digital PCR and next-generation sequencing, for the implementation of IHC. The results suggest that molecular approaches in solid and liquid biopsies could improve the characterization of “low” IHC cases, revealing that the majority harbor a deletion of one allele and a mutation of the other one. Redefining the current IHC model through adequate recognition of the p53 “low-level” phenotype as aberrant might be helpful in better understanding the prognostic role of p53 and possibly, in the future, correctly assigning target treatment. ABSTRACT: Chromosomal instability (CIN) is very frequent in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and it is characterized by TP53 deletions/mutations resulting in p53 nuclear accumulation, as revealed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), which considers the cases with “high” staining levels to be positive. Aiming to improve aberrant TP53 detection, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to evaluate TP53 deletion in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded DNA (FFPE-DNA) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). To further investigate the mutational TP53 profile, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in a subset of FFPE samples. After combining “low” and “high” IHC staining level groups, the proportion of deletion events was significantly higher compared to the “intermediate” group (72.9% vs. 47.5%, p-value = 0.002). The ddPCR TP53 deletion assay was feasible for cfDNA but only had good agreement (72.7%, Cohen’s kappa = 0.48) with the assay performed with FFPE-DNA of the “low-level” group. NGS analysis confirmed that, in the “low-level” group, a high percentage (66.7%) of cases were aberrant, with disruptive mutations that probably led to p53 loss. Data suggested that p53 IHC alone underestimates the CIN phenotype in GEA and that molecular analysis in both solid and liquid biopsies could be integrated with it; in particular, in cases of completely negative staining. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10216170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102161702023-05-27 p53/TP53 Status Assessment in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Boldrin, Elisa Piano, Maria Assunta Bernaudo, Francesco Alfieri, Rita Biasin, Maria Raffaella Montagner, Isabella Monia Volpato, Alice Mattara, Genny Lamacchia, Francesco Magni, Giovanna Rosato, Antonio Scapinello, Antonio Pilati, Pierluigi Curtarello, Matteo Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Despite p53 aberration, as a prognostic biomarker, still remaining a matter of debate for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), the characterization of p53/TP53 is routinely performed to assign chromosomal instability (CIN). The current gold standard for p53 assessment is immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, several studies with other tumors have demonstrated that “low” IHC staining levels should be considered as aberrant as “strong” staining due to mutated p53. We investigated the potential of molecular assays, such as droplet digital PCR and next-generation sequencing, for the implementation of IHC. The results suggest that molecular approaches in solid and liquid biopsies could improve the characterization of “low” IHC cases, revealing that the majority harbor a deletion of one allele and a mutation of the other one. Redefining the current IHC model through adequate recognition of the p53 “low-level” phenotype as aberrant might be helpful in better understanding the prognostic role of p53 and possibly, in the future, correctly assigning target treatment. ABSTRACT: Chromosomal instability (CIN) is very frequent in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and it is characterized by TP53 deletions/mutations resulting in p53 nuclear accumulation, as revealed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), which considers the cases with “high” staining levels to be positive. Aiming to improve aberrant TP53 detection, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to evaluate TP53 deletion in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded DNA (FFPE-DNA) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). To further investigate the mutational TP53 profile, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in a subset of FFPE samples. After combining “low” and “high” IHC staining level groups, the proportion of deletion events was significantly higher compared to the “intermediate” group (72.9% vs. 47.5%, p-value = 0.002). The ddPCR TP53 deletion assay was feasible for cfDNA but only had good agreement (72.7%, Cohen’s kappa = 0.48) with the assay performed with FFPE-DNA of the “low-level” group. NGS analysis confirmed that, in the “low-level” group, a high percentage (66.7%) of cases were aberrant, with disruptive mutations that probably led to p53 loss. Data suggested that p53 IHC alone underestimates the CIN phenotype in GEA and that molecular analysis in both solid and liquid biopsies could be integrated with it; in particular, in cases of completely negative staining. MDPI 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10216170/ /pubmed/37345120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102783 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Boldrin, Elisa Piano, Maria Assunta Bernaudo, Francesco Alfieri, Rita Biasin, Maria Raffaella Montagner, Isabella Monia Volpato, Alice Mattara, Genny Lamacchia, Francesco Magni, Giovanna Rosato, Antonio Scapinello, Antonio Pilati, Pierluigi Curtarello, Matteo p53/TP53 Status Assessment in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma |
title | p53/TP53 Status Assessment in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma |
title_full | p53/TP53 Status Assessment in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | p53/TP53 Status Assessment in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | p53/TP53 Status Assessment in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma |
title_short | p53/TP53 Status Assessment in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | p53/tp53 status assessment in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boldrinelisa p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT pianomariaassunta p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT bernaudofrancesco p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT alfieririta p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT biasinmariaraffaella p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT montagnerisabellamonia p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT volpatoalice p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT mattaragenny p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT lamacchiafrancesco p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT magnigiovanna p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT rosatoantonio p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT scapinelloantonio p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT pilatipierluigi p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT curtarellomatteo p53tp53statusassessmentingastroesophagealadenocarcinoma |