Cargando…

The Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Routine Clinical Practice

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Most Spanish specialists involved in the clinical management of spinal cord compression are familiar with the scoring systems for spine instability and spinal compression as well as with the NICE guideline recommendations. However, many do not apply them in routine practice. Scores o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Romasanta, Luis Alberto, Arana, Estanislao, Kovacs, Francisco M., Royuela, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102821
_version_ 1785048358365167616
author Pérez-Romasanta, Luis Alberto
Arana, Estanislao
Kovacs, Francisco M.
Royuela, Ana
author_facet Pérez-Romasanta, Luis Alberto
Arana, Estanislao
Kovacs, Francisco M.
Royuela, Ana
author_sort Pérez-Romasanta, Luis Alberto
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Most Spanish specialists involved in the clinical management of spinal cord compression are familiar with the scoring systems for spine instability and spinal compression as well as with the NICE guideline recommendations. However, many do not apply them in routine practice. Scores on the scales used to evaluate spine instability in neoplastic diseases were interpreted correctly by 57.5–70.0% of the practitioners while scores of the spinal cord compression grading system were interpreted correctly by 30.0–37.5%. There is room for improvement in the management of SMD in routine practice. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: Whether clinical management of spinal metastatic disease (SMD) matches evidence-based recommendations is largely unknown. (2) Patients and Methods: A questionnaire was distributed through Spanish Medical Societies, exploring routine practice, interpretation of the SINS and ESCC scores and agreement with items in the Tokuhashi and SINS scales, and NICE guideline recommendations. Questionnaires were completed voluntarily and anonymously, without compensation. (3) Results: Eighty specialists participated in the study. A protocol for patients with SMD existed in 33.7% of the hospitals, a specific multidisciplinary board in 33.7%, 40% of radiological reports included the ESCC score, and a prognostic scoring method was used in 73.7%. While 77.5% of the participants were familiar with SINS, only 60% used it. The different SINS and ESCC scores were interpreted correctly by 57.5–70.0% and 30.0–37.5% of the participants, respectively. Over 70% agreed with the items included in the SINS and Tokuhashi scores and with the recommendations from the NICE guideline. Differences were found across private/public sectors, hospital complexity, number of years of experience, number of patients with SMD seen annually and especially across specialties. (4) Conclusions: Most specialists know and agree with features defining the gold standard treatment for patients with SCC, but many do not apply them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10216687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102166872023-05-27 The Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Routine Clinical Practice Pérez-Romasanta, Luis Alberto Arana, Estanislao Kovacs, Francisco M. Royuela, Ana Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Most Spanish specialists involved in the clinical management of spinal cord compression are familiar with the scoring systems for spine instability and spinal compression as well as with the NICE guideline recommendations. However, many do not apply them in routine practice. Scores on the scales used to evaluate spine instability in neoplastic diseases were interpreted correctly by 57.5–70.0% of the practitioners while scores of the spinal cord compression grading system were interpreted correctly by 30.0–37.5%. There is room for improvement in the management of SMD in routine practice. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: Whether clinical management of spinal metastatic disease (SMD) matches evidence-based recommendations is largely unknown. (2) Patients and Methods: A questionnaire was distributed through Spanish Medical Societies, exploring routine practice, interpretation of the SINS and ESCC scores and agreement with items in the Tokuhashi and SINS scales, and NICE guideline recommendations. Questionnaires were completed voluntarily and anonymously, without compensation. (3) Results: Eighty specialists participated in the study. A protocol for patients with SMD existed in 33.7% of the hospitals, a specific multidisciplinary board in 33.7%, 40% of radiological reports included the ESCC score, and a prognostic scoring method was used in 73.7%. While 77.5% of the participants were familiar with SINS, only 60% used it. The different SINS and ESCC scores were interpreted correctly by 57.5–70.0% and 30.0–37.5% of the participants, respectively. Over 70% agreed with the items included in the SINS and Tokuhashi scores and with the recommendations from the NICE guideline. Differences were found across private/public sectors, hospital complexity, number of years of experience, number of patients with SMD seen annually and especially across specialties. (4) Conclusions: Most specialists know and agree with features defining the gold standard treatment for patients with SCC, but many do not apply them. MDPI 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10216687/ /pubmed/37345158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102821 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pérez-Romasanta, Luis Alberto
Arana, Estanislao
Kovacs, Francisco M.
Royuela, Ana
The Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Routine Clinical Practice
title The Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Routine Clinical Practice
title_full The Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Routine Clinical Practice
title_fullStr The Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Routine Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed The Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Routine Clinical Practice
title_short The Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Routine Clinical Practice
title_sort management of metastatic spinal cord compression in routine clinical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102821
work_keys_str_mv AT perezromasantaluisalberto themanagementofmetastaticspinalcordcompressioninroutineclinicalpractice
AT aranaestanislao themanagementofmetastaticspinalcordcompressioninroutineclinicalpractice
AT kovacsfranciscom themanagementofmetastaticspinalcordcompressioninroutineclinicalpractice
AT royuelaana themanagementofmetastaticspinalcordcompressioninroutineclinicalpractice
AT perezromasantaluisalberto managementofmetastaticspinalcordcompressioninroutineclinicalpractice
AT aranaestanislao managementofmetastaticspinalcordcompressioninroutineclinicalpractice
AT kovacsfranciscom managementofmetastaticspinalcordcompressioninroutineclinicalpractice
AT royuelaana managementofmetastaticspinalcordcompressioninroutineclinicalpractice