Cargando…

Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement of refractive predictability of a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer, which uses segmental AL calculation, with another SS-OCT biometer, and an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer. The secondary objective was to describe the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gjerdrum, Bjørn, Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar, Nilsen, Christian, Gundersen, Morten, Jensen, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251985
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S408685
_version_ 1785048395702861824
author Gjerdrum, Bjørn
Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
Nilsen, Christian
Gundersen, Morten
Jensen, Per
author_facet Gjerdrum, Bjørn
Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
Nilsen, Christian
Gundersen, Morten
Jensen, Per
author_sort Gjerdrum, Bjørn
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement of refractive predictability of a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer, which uses segmental AL calculation, with another SS-OCT biometer, and an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer. The secondary objective was to describe the refractive outcomes, visual acuities, and the agreement of different preoperative biometric parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective one-arm study of refractive and visual outcomes after successful cataract surgery. Preoperative biometric data were collected with two different SS-OCT device (Argos, Alcon Laboratories and Anterion, Heidelberg Engineering) and an OLCR device (Lenstar 900, Haag-Streit). The Barrett Universal II formula was used to calculate IOL power for all three devices. Follow-up examination was 1–2 months after surgery. The main outcome measure, refractive prediction error (RPE), was calculated as the achieved postoperative refraction minus the predicted refraction for each device. Absolute error (AE) was calculated by reducing the mean error to zero. RESULTS: The study included 129 eyes of 129 patients. The mean RPE was 0.06, −0.14 and 0.17 D for the Argos, Anterion and Lenstar, respectively (p < 0.01). The Argos also had the lowest absolute RPE, while the Lenstar had the lowest median AE, but this was not statistically significant (p > 0.2). The percentages of eyes with RPE within ±0.5 was 76%, 71%, and 78% for the Argos, Anterion, and Lenstar, respectively. The percentages of eyes with AE within 0.5 D was 79%, 84%, and 82% for the Argos, Anterion and Lenstar, respectively. None of these percentages were statistically significantly different (p > 0.2). CONCLUSION: All three biometers showed good refractive predictability with no statistically significant differences in AE or percentages of eyes within ± 0.5 D of RPE or AE. The lowest arithmetic RPE was found with the Argos biometer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10216845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102168452023-05-27 Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer Gjerdrum, Bjørn Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar Nilsen, Christian Gundersen, Morten Jensen, Per Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement of refractive predictability of a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer, which uses segmental AL calculation, with another SS-OCT biometer, and an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer. The secondary objective was to describe the refractive outcomes, visual acuities, and the agreement of different preoperative biometric parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective one-arm study of refractive and visual outcomes after successful cataract surgery. Preoperative biometric data were collected with two different SS-OCT device (Argos, Alcon Laboratories and Anterion, Heidelberg Engineering) and an OLCR device (Lenstar 900, Haag-Streit). The Barrett Universal II formula was used to calculate IOL power for all three devices. Follow-up examination was 1–2 months after surgery. The main outcome measure, refractive prediction error (RPE), was calculated as the achieved postoperative refraction minus the predicted refraction for each device. Absolute error (AE) was calculated by reducing the mean error to zero. RESULTS: The study included 129 eyes of 129 patients. The mean RPE was 0.06, −0.14 and 0.17 D for the Argos, Anterion and Lenstar, respectively (p < 0.01). The Argos also had the lowest absolute RPE, while the Lenstar had the lowest median AE, but this was not statistically significant (p > 0.2). The percentages of eyes with RPE within ±0.5 was 76%, 71%, and 78% for the Argos, Anterion, and Lenstar, respectively. The percentages of eyes with AE within 0.5 D was 79%, 84%, and 82% for the Argos, Anterion and Lenstar, respectively. None of these percentages were statistically significantly different (p > 0.2). CONCLUSION: All three biometers showed good refractive predictability with no statistically significant differences in AE or percentages of eyes within ± 0.5 D of RPE or AE. The lowest arithmetic RPE was found with the Argos biometer. Dove 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10216845/ /pubmed/37251985 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S408685 Text en © 2023 Gjerdrum et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gjerdrum, Bjørn
Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
Nilsen, Christian
Gundersen, Morten
Jensen, Per
Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer
title Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer
title_full Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer
title_fullStr Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer
title_full_unstemmed Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer
title_short Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer
title_sort refractive predictability and biometry agreement of a combined swept source optical coherence and reflectometry biometer compared to an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and an ss-oct biometer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251985
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S408685
work_keys_str_mv AT gjerdrumbjørn refractivepredictabilityandbiometryagreementofacombinedsweptsourceopticalcoherenceandreflectometrybiometercomparedtoanopticallowcoherencereflectometrybiometerandanssoctbiometer
AT gundersenkjellgunnar refractivepredictabilityandbiometryagreementofacombinedsweptsourceopticalcoherenceandreflectometrybiometercomparedtoanopticallowcoherencereflectometrybiometerandanssoctbiometer
AT nilsenchristian refractivepredictabilityandbiometryagreementofacombinedsweptsourceopticalcoherenceandreflectometrybiometercomparedtoanopticallowcoherencereflectometrybiometerandanssoctbiometer
AT gundersenmorten refractivepredictabilityandbiometryagreementofacombinedsweptsourceopticalcoherenceandreflectometrybiometercomparedtoanopticallowcoherencereflectometrybiometerandanssoctbiometer
AT jensenper refractivepredictabilityandbiometryagreementofacombinedsweptsourceopticalcoherenceandreflectometrybiometercomparedtoanopticallowcoherencereflectometrybiometerandanssoctbiometer