Cargando…

Feasibility of Renal Blood Flow Measurement Using (64)Cu-ATSM PET/MRI: A Quantitative PET and MRI Study

This study aimed to evaluate the renal blood flow (RBF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using (64)Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(4-methylthiosemicarbazonate) ((64)Cu-ATSM) for positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We included five healthy controls (HCs) and ten pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishikawa, Yudai, Takahashi, Naoki, Nishikawa, Sho, Shimamoto, Yuki, Nishimori, Kazuhisa, Kobayashi, Mamiko, Kimura, Hideki, Tsujikawa, Tetsuya, Kasuno, Kenji, Mori, Tetsuya, Kiyono, Yasushi, Okazawa, Hidehiko, Iwano, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101685
Descripción
Sumario:This study aimed to evaluate the renal blood flow (RBF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using (64)Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(4-methylthiosemicarbazonate) ((64)Cu-ATSM) for positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We included five healthy controls (HCs) and ten patients with CKD. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from the serum creatinine (cr) and cystatin C (cys) levels. The estimated RBF (eRBF) was calculated using the eGFR, hematocrit, and filtration fraction. A single dose of (64)Cu-ATSM (300–400 MBq) was administered for RBF evaluation, and a 40 min dynamic PET scan was performed with simultaneous arterial spin labeling (ASL) imaging. PET-RBF images were obtained from the dynamic PET images at 3 min after injection using the image-derived input function method. The mean eRBF values calculated from various eGFR values differed significantly between the patients and HCs; both groups also differed significantly in terms of the RBF values (mL/min/100 g) measured using PET (151 ± 20 vs. 124 ± 22, p < 0.05) and ASL-MRI (172 ± 38 vs. 125 ± 30, p < 0.001). The ASL-MRI-RBF was positively correlated with the eRBFcr-cys (r = 0.858, p < 0.001). The PET-RBF was positively correlated with the eRBFcr-cys (r = 0.893, p < 0.001). The ASL-RBF was positively correlated with the PET-RBF (r = 0.849, p < 0.001). (64)Cu-ATSM PET/MRI demonstrated the reliability of PET-RBF and ASL-RBF by comparing them with eRBF. This is the first study to demonstrate that (64)Cu-ATSM-PET is useful for assessing the RBF and is well correlated with ASL-MRI.