Cargando…

A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases

There has not been extensive research into crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) in neurodegenerative disorders. CCD is frequently detected using positron emission tomography (PET). However, advanced MRI techniques have come forth for the detection of CCD. The correct diagnosis of CCD is crucial for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan, Majrashi, Naif Ali, Alyami, Ali S., Ageeli, Wael A., Refaee, Turkey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101674
_version_ 1785048419625074688
author Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan
Majrashi, Naif Ali
Alyami, Ali S.
Ageeli, Wael A.
Refaee, Turkey A.
author_facet Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan
Majrashi, Naif Ali
Alyami, Ali S.
Ageeli, Wael A.
Refaee, Turkey A.
author_sort Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan
collection PubMed
description There has not been extensive research into crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) in neurodegenerative disorders. CCD is frequently detected using positron emission tomography (PET). However, advanced MRI techniques have come forth for the detection of CCD. The correct diagnosis of CCD is crucial for the care of neurological patients and those with neurodegenerative conditions. The purpose of this study is to determine whether PET can offer extra value over MRI or an advanced technique in MRI for detecting CCD in neurological conditions. We searched three main electronic databases from 1980 until the present and included only English and peer-reviewed journal articles. Eight articles involving 1246 participants met the inclusion criteria, six of which used PET imaging while the other two used MRI and hybrid imaging. The findings in PET studies showed decreased cerebral metabolism in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices, as on the opposite side of the cerebellar cortex. However, the findings in MRI studies showed decreased cerebellar volumes. This study concludes that PET is a common, accurate, and sensitive technique for detecting both crossed cerebellar and uncrossed basal ganglia as well as thalamic diaschisis in neurodegenerative diseases, while MRI is better for measuring brain volume. This study suggests that PET has a higher diagnostic value for diagnosing CCD compared to MRI, and that PET is a more valuable technique for predicting CCD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10216953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102169532023-05-27 A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan Majrashi, Naif Ali Alyami, Ali S. Ageeli, Wael A. Refaee, Turkey A. Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review There has not been extensive research into crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) in neurodegenerative disorders. CCD is frequently detected using positron emission tomography (PET). However, advanced MRI techniques have come forth for the detection of CCD. The correct diagnosis of CCD is crucial for the care of neurological patients and those with neurodegenerative conditions. The purpose of this study is to determine whether PET can offer extra value over MRI or an advanced technique in MRI for detecting CCD in neurological conditions. We searched three main electronic databases from 1980 until the present and included only English and peer-reviewed journal articles. Eight articles involving 1246 participants met the inclusion criteria, six of which used PET imaging while the other two used MRI and hybrid imaging. The findings in PET studies showed decreased cerebral metabolism in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices, as on the opposite side of the cerebellar cortex. However, the findings in MRI studies showed decreased cerebellar volumes. This study concludes that PET is a common, accurate, and sensitive technique for detecting both crossed cerebellar and uncrossed basal ganglia as well as thalamic diaschisis in neurodegenerative diseases, while MRI is better for measuring brain volume. This study suggests that PET has a higher diagnostic value for diagnosing CCD compared to MRI, and that PET is a more valuable technique for predicting CCD. MDPI 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10216953/ /pubmed/37238158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101674 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan
Majrashi, Naif Ali
Alyami, Ali S.
Ageeli, Wael A.
Refaee, Turkey A.
A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases
title A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_full A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_short A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_sort systematic review of pet contrasted with mri for detecting crossed cerebellar diaschisis in patients with neurodegenerative diseases
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101674
work_keys_str_mv AT tripathishailendramohan asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases
AT majrashinaifali asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases
AT alyamialis asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases
AT ageeliwaela asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases
AT refaeeturkeya asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases
AT tripathishailendramohan systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases
AT majrashinaifali systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases
AT alyamialis systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases
AT ageeliwaela systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases
AT refaeeturkeya systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases