Cargando…
A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases
There has not been extensive research into crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) in neurodegenerative disorders. CCD is frequently detected using positron emission tomography (PET). However, advanced MRI techniques have come forth for the detection of CCD. The correct diagnosis of CCD is crucial for t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101674 |
_version_ | 1785048419625074688 |
---|---|
author | Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan Majrashi, Naif Ali Alyami, Ali S. Ageeli, Wael A. Refaee, Turkey A. |
author_facet | Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan Majrashi, Naif Ali Alyami, Ali S. Ageeli, Wael A. Refaee, Turkey A. |
author_sort | Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan |
collection | PubMed |
description | There has not been extensive research into crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) in neurodegenerative disorders. CCD is frequently detected using positron emission tomography (PET). However, advanced MRI techniques have come forth for the detection of CCD. The correct diagnosis of CCD is crucial for the care of neurological patients and those with neurodegenerative conditions. The purpose of this study is to determine whether PET can offer extra value over MRI or an advanced technique in MRI for detecting CCD in neurological conditions. We searched three main electronic databases from 1980 until the present and included only English and peer-reviewed journal articles. Eight articles involving 1246 participants met the inclusion criteria, six of which used PET imaging while the other two used MRI and hybrid imaging. The findings in PET studies showed decreased cerebral metabolism in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices, as on the opposite side of the cerebellar cortex. However, the findings in MRI studies showed decreased cerebellar volumes. This study concludes that PET is a common, accurate, and sensitive technique for detecting both crossed cerebellar and uncrossed basal ganglia as well as thalamic diaschisis in neurodegenerative diseases, while MRI is better for measuring brain volume. This study suggests that PET has a higher diagnostic value for diagnosing CCD compared to MRI, and that PET is a more valuable technique for predicting CCD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10216953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102169532023-05-27 A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan Majrashi, Naif Ali Alyami, Ali S. Ageeli, Wael A. Refaee, Turkey A. Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review There has not been extensive research into crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) in neurodegenerative disorders. CCD is frequently detected using positron emission tomography (PET). However, advanced MRI techniques have come forth for the detection of CCD. The correct diagnosis of CCD is crucial for the care of neurological patients and those with neurodegenerative conditions. The purpose of this study is to determine whether PET can offer extra value over MRI or an advanced technique in MRI for detecting CCD in neurological conditions. We searched three main electronic databases from 1980 until the present and included only English and peer-reviewed journal articles. Eight articles involving 1246 participants met the inclusion criteria, six of which used PET imaging while the other two used MRI and hybrid imaging. The findings in PET studies showed decreased cerebral metabolism in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices, as on the opposite side of the cerebellar cortex. However, the findings in MRI studies showed decreased cerebellar volumes. This study concludes that PET is a common, accurate, and sensitive technique for detecting both crossed cerebellar and uncrossed basal ganglia as well as thalamic diaschisis in neurodegenerative diseases, while MRI is better for measuring brain volume. This study suggests that PET has a higher diagnostic value for diagnosing CCD compared to MRI, and that PET is a more valuable technique for predicting CCD. MDPI 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10216953/ /pubmed/37238158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101674 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Tripathi, Shailendra Mohan Majrashi, Naif Ali Alyami, Ali S. Ageeli, Wael A. Refaee, Turkey A. A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases |
title | A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases |
title_full | A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases |
title_short | A Systematic Review of PET Contrasted with MRI for Detecting Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases |
title_sort | systematic review of pet contrasted with mri for detecting crossed cerebellar diaschisis in patients with neurodegenerative diseases |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101674 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tripathishailendramohan asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases AT majrashinaifali asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases AT alyamialis asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases AT ageeliwaela asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases AT refaeeturkeya asystematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases AT tripathishailendramohan systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases AT majrashinaifali systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases AT alyamialis systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases AT ageeliwaela systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases AT refaeeturkeya systematicreviewofpetcontrastedwithmrifordetectingcrossedcerebellardiaschisisinpatientswithneurodegenerativediseases |