Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study

Successful outcome of pulp therapy depends on good chemomechanical preparation of the canals. This is completed with the help of various upcoming rotary and hand files. However, during this preparation, there might be an apical extrusion of the debris which may result in postoperative complications....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suresh, Balaji, Jeevanandan, Ganesh, Ravindran, Vignesh, Mashyakhy, Mohammed, Alessa, Noura, Syed, Ather Ahmed, Panda, Suman, Assiry, Ali Ahmed, Maganur, Prabhadevi C., Vishwanathaiah, Satish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238446
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050898
_version_ 1785048431915433984
author Suresh, Balaji
Jeevanandan, Ganesh
Ravindran, Vignesh
Mashyakhy, Mohammed
Alessa, Noura
Syed, Ather Ahmed
Panda, Suman
Assiry, Ali Ahmed
Maganur, Prabhadevi C.
Vishwanathaiah, Satish
author_facet Suresh, Balaji
Jeevanandan, Ganesh
Ravindran, Vignesh
Mashyakhy, Mohammed
Alessa, Noura
Syed, Ather Ahmed
Panda, Suman
Assiry, Ali Ahmed
Maganur, Prabhadevi C.
Vishwanathaiah, Satish
author_sort Suresh, Balaji
collection PubMed
description Successful outcome of pulp therapy depends on good chemomechanical preparation of the canals. This is completed with the help of various upcoming rotary and hand files. However, during this preparation, there might be an apical extrusion of the debris which may result in postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the number of debris apically extruded during canal preparation using two different pediatric rotary file systems and conventional hand file systems in primary teeth. 60 primary maxillary central incisors that were extracted due to trauma or untreated dental caries with no signs of resorption were taken. Canal preparation was executed using three different file systems: Group A: Group A hand K file system, Group B Kedo S Plus, Group C Kedo SG Blue. For each of these files using the Myers and Montgomery model, the pre- and post-weight of the eppendorf tube was assessed to quantify the number of apical debris. The maximum extrusion of apical debris was noticed with the Hand K-file system. The least debris was noticed in the Kedo S Plus file system. Statistical analysis revealed that there were highly significant differences in apical extrusion and debris when comparing hand files and rotary files and also between the two rotary files used. Apical debris collection is an unavoidable outcome of canal instrumentation. Among the file systems compared, rotary files had lesser extrusion when compared to hand files. Among the rotary files, Kedo S plus showed normal extrusion compared to SG Blue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10217004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102170042023-05-27 Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study Suresh, Balaji Jeevanandan, Ganesh Ravindran, Vignesh Mashyakhy, Mohammed Alessa, Noura Syed, Ather Ahmed Panda, Suman Assiry, Ali Ahmed Maganur, Prabhadevi C. Vishwanathaiah, Satish Children (Basel) Article Successful outcome of pulp therapy depends on good chemomechanical preparation of the canals. This is completed with the help of various upcoming rotary and hand files. However, during this preparation, there might be an apical extrusion of the debris which may result in postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the number of debris apically extruded during canal preparation using two different pediatric rotary file systems and conventional hand file systems in primary teeth. 60 primary maxillary central incisors that were extracted due to trauma or untreated dental caries with no signs of resorption were taken. Canal preparation was executed using three different file systems: Group A: Group A hand K file system, Group B Kedo S Plus, Group C Kedo SG Blue. For each of these files using the Myers and Montgomery model, the pre- and post-weight of the eppendorf tube was assessed to quantify the number of apical debris. The maximum extrusion of apical debris was noticed with the Hand K-file system. The least debris was noticed in the Kedo S Plus file system. Statistical analysis revealed that there were highly significant differences in apical extrusion and debris when comparing hand files and rotary files and also between the two rotary files used. Apical debris collection is an unavoidable outcome of canal instrumentation. Among the file systems compared, rotary files had lesser extrusion when compared to hand files. Among the rotary files, Kedo S plus showed normal extrusion compared to SG Blue. MDPI 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10217004/ /pubmed/37238446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050898 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Suresh, Balaji
Jeevanandan, Ganesh
Ravindran, Vignesh
Mashyakhy, Mohammed
Alessa, Noura
Syed, Ather Ahmed
Panda, Suman
Assiry, Ali Ahmed
Maganur, Prabhadevi C.
Vishwanathaiah, Satish
Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary maxillary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238446
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050898
work_keys_str_mv AT sureshbalaji comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy
AT jeevanandanganesh comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy
AT ravindranvignesh comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy
AT mashyakhymohammed comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy
AT alessanoura comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy
AT syedatherahmed comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy
AT pandasuman comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy
AT assiryaliahmed comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy
AT maganurprabhadevic comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy
AT vishwanathaiahsatish comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy