Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
Successful outcome of pulp therapy depends on good chemomechanical preparation of the canals. This is completed with the help of various upcoming rotary and hand files. However, during this preparation, there might be an apical extrusion of the debris which may result in postoperative complications....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050898 |
_version_ | 1785048431915433984 |
---|---|
author | Suresh, Balaji Jeevanandan, Ganesh Ravindran, Vignesh Mashyakhy, Mohammed Alessa, Noura Syed, Ather Ahmed Panda, Suman Assiry, Ali Ahmed Maganur, Prabhadevi C. Vishwanathaiah, Satish |
author_facet | Suresh, Balaji Jeevanandan, Ganesh Ravindran, Vignesh Mashyakhy, Mohammed Alessa, Noura Syed, Ather Ahmed Panda, Suman Assiry, Ali Ahmed Maganur, Prabhadevi C. Vishwanathaiah, Satish |
author_sort | Suresh, Balaji |
collection | PubMed |
description | Successful outcome of pulp therapy depends on good chemomechanical preparation of the canals. This is completed with the help of various upcoming rotary and hand files. However, during this preparation, there might be an apical extrusion of the debris which may result in postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the number of debris apically extruded during canal preparation using two different pediatric rotary file systems and conventional hand file systems in primary teeth. 60 primary maxillary central incisors that were extracted due to trauma or untreated dental caries with no signs of resorption were taken. Canal preparation was executed using three different file systems: Group A: Group A hand K file system, Group B Kedo S Plus, Group C Kedo SG Blue. For each of these files using the Myers and Montgomery model, the pre- and post-weight of the eppendorf tube was assessed to quantify the number of apical debris. The maximum extrusion of apical debris was noticed with the Hand K-file system. The least debris was noticed in the Kedo S Plus file system. Statistical analysis revealed that there were highly significant differences in apical extrusion and debris when comparing hand files and rotary files and also between the two rotary files used. Apical debris collection is an unavoidable outcome of canal instrumentation. Among the file systems compared, rotary files had lesser extrusion when compared to hand files. Among the rotary files, Kedo S plus showed normal extrusion compared to SG Blue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10217004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102170042023-05-27 Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study Suresh, Balaji Jeevanandan, Ganesh Ravindran, Vignesh Mashyakhy, Mohammed Alessa, Noura Syed, Ather Ahmed Panda, Suman Assiry, Ali Ahmed Maganur, Prabhadevi C. Vishwanathaiah, Satish Children (Basel) Article Successful outcome of pulp therapy depends on good chemomechanical preparation of the canals. This is completed with the help of various upcoming rotary and hand files. However, during this preparation, there might be an apical extrusion of the debris which may result in postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the number of debris apically extruded during canal preparation using two different pediatric rotary file systems and conventional hand file systems in primary teeth. 60 primary maxillary central incisors that were extracted due to trauma or untreated dental caries with no signs of resorption were taken. Canal preparation was executed using three different file systems: Group A: Group A hand K file system, Group B Kedo S Plus, Group C Kedo SG Blue. For each of these files using the Myers and Montgomery model, the pre- and post-weight of the eppendorf tube was assessed to quantify the number of apical debris. The maximum extrusion of apical debris was noticed with the Hand K-file system. The least debris was noticed in the Kedo S Plus file system. Statistical analysis revealed that there were highly significant differences in apical extrusion and debris when comparing hand files and rotary files and also between the two rotary files used. Apical debris collection is an unavoidable outcome of canal instrumentation. Among the file systems compared, rotary files had lesser extrusion when compared to hand files. Among the rotary files, Kedo S plus showed normal extrusion compared to SG Blue. MDPI 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10217004/ /pubmed/37238446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050898 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Suresh, Balaji Jeevanandan, Ganesh Ravindran, Vignesh Mashyakhy, Mohammed Alessa, Noura Syed, Ather Ahmed Panda, Suman Assiry, Ali Ahmed Maganur, Prabhadevi C. Vishwanathaiah, Satish Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary maxillary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: an in vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050898 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sureshbalaji comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT jeevanandanganesh comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT ravindranvignesh comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT mashyakhymohammed comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT alessanoura comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT syedatherahmed comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT pandasuman comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT assiryaliahmed comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT maganurprabhadevic comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT vishwanathaiahsatish comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimarymaxillaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy |