Cargando…
Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison
The quantification of causality is vital for understanding various important phenomena in nature and laboratories, such as brain networks, environmental dynamics, and pathologies. The two most widely used methods for measuring causality are Granger Causality (GC) and Transfer Entropy (TE), which rel...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25050806 |
_version_ | 1785048475759542272 |
---|---|
author | Choong, Heng Jie Kim, Eun-jin He, Fei |
author_facet | Choong, Heng Jie Kim, Eun-jin He, Fei |
author_sort | Choong, Heng Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The quantification of causality is vital for understanding various important phenomena in nature and laboratories, such as brain networks, environmental dynamics, and pathologies. The two most widely used methods for measuring causality are Granger Causality (GC) and Transfer Entropy (TE), which rely on measuring the improvement in the prediction of one process based on the knowledge of another process at an earlier time. However, they have their own limitations, e.g., in applications to nonlinear, non-stationary data, or non-parametric models. In this study, we propose an alternative approach to quantify causality through information geometry that overcomes such limitations. Specifically, based on the information rate that measures the rate of change of the time-dependent distribution, we develop a model-free approach called information rate causality that captures the occurrence of the causality based on the change in the distribution of one process caused by another. This measurement is suitable for analyzing numerically generated non-stationary, nonlinear data. The latter are generated by simulating different types of discrete autoregressive models which contain linear and nonlinear interactions in unidirectional and bidirectional time-series signals. Our results show that information rate causalitycan capture the coupling of both linear and nonlinear data better than GC and TE in the several examples explored in the paper. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10217183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102171832023-05-27 Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison Choong, Heng Jie Kim, Eun-jin He, Fei Entropy (Basel) Article The quantification of causality is vital for understanding various important phenomena in nature and laboratories, such as brain networks, environmental dynamics, and pathologies. The two most widely used methods for measuring causality are Granger Causality (GC) and Transfer Entropy (TE), which rely on measuring the improvement in the prediction of one process based on the knowledge of another process at an earlier time. However, they have their own limitations, e.g., in applications to nonlinear, non-stationary data, or non-parametric models. In this study, we propose an alternative approach to quantify causality through information geometry that overcomes such limitations. Specifically, based on the information rate that measures the rate of change of the time-dependent distribution, we develop a model-free approach called information rate causality that captures the occurrence of the causality based on the change in the distribution of one process caused by another. This measurement is suitable for analyzing numerically generated non-stationary, nonlinear data. The latter are generated by simulating different types of discrete autoregressive models which contain linear and nonlinear interactions in unidirectional and bidirectional time-series signals. Our results show that information rate causalitycan capture the coupling of both linear and nonlinear data better than GC and TE in the several examples explored in the paper. MDPI 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10217183/ /pubmed/37238561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25050806 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Choong, Heng Jie Kim, Eun-jin He, Fei Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison |
title | Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison |
title_full | Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison |
title_fullStr | Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison |
title_short | Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison |
title_sort | causality analysis with information geometry: a comparison |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25050806 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choonghengjie causalityanalysiswithinformationgeometryacomparison AT kimeunjin causalityanalysiswithinformationgeometryacomparison AT hefei causalityanalysiswithinformationgeometryacomparison |