Cargando…

Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison

The quantification of causality is vital for understanding various important phenomena in nature and laboratories, such as brain networks, environmental dynamics, and pathologies. The two most widely used methods for measuring causality are Granger Causality (GC) and Transfer Entropy (TE), which rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choong, Heng Jie, Kim, Eun-jin, He, Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238561
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25050806
_version_ 1785048475759542272
author Choong, Heng Jie
Kim, Eun-jin
He, Fei
author_facet Choong, Heng Jie
Kim, Eun-jin
He, Fei
author_sort Choong, Heng Jie
collection PubMed
description The quantification of causality is vital for understanding various important phenomena in nature and laboratories, such as brain networks, environmental dynamics, and pathologies. The two most widely used methods for measuring causality are Granger Causality (GC) and Transfer Entropy (TE), which rely on measuring the improvement in the prediction of one process based on the knowledge of another process at an earlier time. However, they have their own limitations, e.g., in applications to nonlinear, non-stationary data, or non-parametric models. In this study, we propose an alternative approach to quantify causality through information geometry that overcomes such limitations. Specifically, based on the information rate that measures the rate of change of the time-dependent distribution, we develop a model-free approach called information rate causality that captures the occurrence of the causality based on the change in the distribution of one process caused by another. This measurement is suitable for analyzing numerically generated non-stationary, nonlinear data. The latter are generated by simulating different types of discrete autoregressive models which contain linear and nonlinear interactions in unidirectional and bidirectional time-series signals. Our results show that information rate causalitycan capture the coupling of both linear and nonlinear data better than GC and TE in the several examples explored in the paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10217183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102171832023-05-27 Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison Choong, Heng Jie Kim, Eun-jin He, Fei Entropy (Basel) Article The quantification of causality is vital for understanding various important phenomena in nature and laboratories, such as brain networks, environmental dynamics, and pathologies. The two most widely used methods for measuring causality are Granger Causality (GC) and Transfer Entropy (TE), which rely on measuring the improvement in the prediction of one process based on the knowledge of another process at an earlier time. However, they have their own limitations, e.g., in applications to nonlinear, non-stationary data, or non-parametric models. In this study, we propose an alternative approach to quantify causality through information geometry that overcomes such limitations. Specifically, based on the information rate that measures the rate of change of the time-dependent distribution, we develop a model-free approach called information rate causality that captures the occurrence of the causality based on the change in the distribution of one process caused by another. This measurement is suitable for analyzing numerically generated non-stationary, nonlinear data. The latter are generated by simulating different types of discrete autoregressive models which contain linear and nonlinear interactions in unidirectional and bidirectional time-series signals. Our results show that information rate causalitycan capture the coupling of both linear and nonlinear data better than GC and TE in the several examples explored in the paper. MDPI 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10217183/ /pubmed/37238561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25050806 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Choong, Heng Jie
Kim, Eun-jin
He, Fei
Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison
title Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison
title_full Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison
title_fullStr Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison
title_short Causality Analysis with Information Geometry: A Comparison
title_sort causality analysis with information geometry: a comparison
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238561
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25050806
work_keys_str_mv AT choonghengjie causalityanalysiswithinformationgeometryacomparison
AT kimeunjin causalityanalysiswithinformationgeometryacomparison
AT hefei causalityanalysiswithinformationgeometryacomparison