Cargando…
Chitosan-Silica Hybrid Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study of Xerogels and Aerogels
Chitosan (CS) is a natural biopolymer that shows promise as a biomaterial for bone-tissue regeneration. However, because of their limited ability to induce cell differentiation and high degradation rate, among other drawbacks associated with its use, the creation of CS-based biomaterials remains a p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37232975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9050383 |
_version_ | 1785048584296595456 |
---|---|
author | Pérez-Moreno, Antonio Piñero, Manuel Fernández-Montesinos, Rafael Pinaglia-Tobaruela, Gonzalo Reyes-Peces, María V. Mesa-Díaz, María del Mar Vilches-Pérez, José Ignacio Esquivias, Luis de la Rosa-Fox, Nicolás Salido, Mercedes |
author_facet | Pérez-Moreno, Antonio Piñero, Manuel Fernández-Montesinos, Rafael Pinaglia-Tobaruela, Gonzalo Reyes-Peces, María V. Mesa-Díaz, María del Mar Vilches-Pérez, José Ignacio Esquivias, Luis de la Rosa-Fox, Nicolás Salido, Mercedes |
author_sort | Pérez-Moreno, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chitosan (CS) is a natural biopolymer that shows promise as a biomaterial for bone-tissue regeneration. However, because of their limited ability to induce cell differentiation and high degradation rate, among other drawbacks associated with its use, the creation of CS-based biomaterials remains a problem in bone tissue engineering research. Here we aimed to reduce these disadvantages while retaining the benefits of potential CS biomaterial by combining it with silica to provide sufficient additional structural support for bone regeneration. In this work, CS-silica xerogel and aerogel hybrids with 8 wt.% CS content, designated SCS8X and SCS8A, respectively, were prepared by sol-gel method, either by direct solvent evaporation at the atmospheric pressure or by supercritical drying in CO(2), respectively. As reported in previous studies, it was confirmed that both types of mesoporous materials exhibited large surface areas (821 m(2)g(−1)–858 m(2)g(−1)) and outstanding bioactivity, as well as osteoconductive properties. In addition to silica and chitosan, the inclusion of 10 wt.% of tricalcium phosphate (TCP), designated SCS8T10X, was also considered, which stimulates a fast bioactive response of the xerogel surface. The results here obtained also demonstrate that xerogels induced earlier cell differentiation than the aerogels with identical composition. In conclusion, our study shows that the sol-gel synthesis of CS-silica xerogels and aerogels enhances not only their bioactive response, but also osteoconduction and cell differentiation properties. Therefore, these new biomaterials should provide adequate secretion of the osteoid for a fast bone regeneration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10217634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102176342023-05-27 Chitosan-Silica Hybrid Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study of Xerogels and Aerogels Pérez-Moreno, Antonio Piñero, Manuel Fernández-Montesinos, Rafael Pinaglia-Tobaruela, Gonzalo Reyes-Peces, María V. Mesa-Díaz, María del Mar Vilches-Pérez, José Ignacio Esquivias, Luis de la Rosa-Fox, Nicolás Salido, Mercedes Gels Article Chitosan (CS) is a natural biopolymer that shows promise as a biomaterial for bone-tissue regeneration. However, because of their limited ability to induce cell differentiation and high degradation rate, among other drawbacks associated with its use, the creation of CS-based biomaterials remains a problem in bone tissue engineering research. Here we aimed to reduce these disadvantages while retaining the benefits of potential CS biomaterial by combining it with silica to provide sufficient additional structural support for bone regeneration. In this work, CS-silica xerogel and aerogel hybrids with 8 wt.% CS content, designated SCS8X and SCS8A, respectively, were prepared by sol-gel method, either by direct solvent evaporation at the atmospheric pressure or by supercritical drying in CO(2), respectively. As reported in previous studies, it was confirmed that both types of mesoporous materials exhibited large surface areas (821 m(2)g(−1)–858 m(2)g(−1)) and outstanding bioactivity, as well as osteoconductive properties. In addition to silica and chitosan, the inclusion of 10 wt.% of tricalcium phosphate (TCP), designated SCS8T10X, was also considered, which stimulates a fast bioactive response of the xerogel surface. The results here obtained also demonstrate that xerogels induced earlier cell differentiation than the aerogels with identical composition. In conclusion, our study shows that the sol-gel synthesis of CS-silica xerogels and aerogels enhances not only their bioactive response, but also osteoconduction and cell differentiation properties. Therefore, these new biomaterials should provide adequate secretion of the osteoid for a fast bone regeneration. MDPI 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10217634/ /pubmed/37232975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9050383 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pérez-Moreno, Antonio Piñero, Manuel Fernández-Montesinos, Rafael Pinaglia-Tobaruela, Gonzalo Reyes-Peces, María V. Mesa-Díaz, María del Mar Vilches-Pérez, José Ignacio Esquivias, Luis de la Rosa-Fox, Nicolás Salido, Mercedes Chitosan-Silica Hybrid Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study of Xerogels and Aerogels |
title | Chitosan-Silica Hybrid Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study of Xerogels and Aerogels |
title_full | Chitosan-Silica Hybrid Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study of Xerogels and Aerogels |
title_fullStr | Chitosan-Silica Hybrid Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study of Xerogels and Aerogels |
title_full_unstemmed | Chitosan-Silica Hybrid Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study of Xerogels and Aerogels |
title_short | Chitosan-Silica Hybrid Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study of Xerogels and Aerogels |
title_sort | chitosan-silica hybrid biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: a comparative study of xerogels and aerogels |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37232975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9050383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perezmorenoantonio chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels AT pineromanuel chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels AT fernandezmontesinosrafael chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels AT pinagliatobaruelagonzalo chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels AT reyespecesmariav chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels AT mesadiazmariadelmar chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels AT vilchesperezjoseignacio chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels AT esquiviasluis chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels AT delarosafoxnicolas chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels AT salidomercedes chitosansilicahybridbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineeringacomparativestudyofxerogelsandaerogels |