Cargando…
Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability
Advances in neonatal care have pushed the limit of viability to incrementally lower gestations over the last decades. However, surviving extremely premature neonates are prone to long-term neurodevelopmental handicaps. This makes ethics a crucial dimension of periviable birth management. At 22 weeks...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050784 |
_version_ | 1785048599806083072 |
---|---|
author | Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana Lucovnik, Miha |
author_facet | Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana Lucovnik, Miha |
author_sort | Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Advances in neonatal care have pushed the limit of viability to incrementally lower gestations over the last decades. However, surviving extremely premature neonates are prone to long-term neurodevelopmental handicaps. This makes ethics a crucial dimension of periviable birth management. At 22 weeks, survival ranges from 1 to 15%, and profound disabilities in survivors are common. Consequently, there is no beneficence-based obligation to offer any aggressive perinatal management. At 23 weeks, survival ranges from 8 to 54%, and survival without severe handicap ranges from 7 to 23%. If fetal indication for cesarean delivery appears, the procedure may be offered when neonatal resuscitation is planned. At a gestational age ≥24 weeks, up to 51% neonates are expected to survive the neonatal period. Survival without profound neurologic disability ranges from 12 to 38%. Beneficence-based obligation to intervene is reasonable at these gestations. Nevertheless, autonomy of parents should also be respected, and parental consent should be sought prior to any intervention. Optimal counselling of parents involves harmonized cooperation of obstetric and neonatal care providers. Every fetus/neonate and every pregnant woman are different and have the right to be considered individually when treatment decisions are being made. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10217697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102176972023-05-27 Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana Lucovnik, Miha Children (Basel) Review Advances in neonatal care have pushed the limit of viability to incrementally lower gestations over the last decades. However, surviving extremely premature neonates are prone to long-term neurodevelopmental handicaps. This makes ethics a crucial dimension of periviable birth management. At 22 weeks, survival ranges from 1 to 15%, and profound disabilities in survivors are common. Consequently, there is no beneficence-based obligation to offer any aggressive perinatal management. At 23 weeks, survival ranges from 8 to 54%, and survival without severe handicap ranges from 7 to 23%. If fetal indication for cesarean delivery appears, the procedure may be offered when neonatal resuscitation is planned. At a gestational age ≥24 weeks, up to 51% neonates are expected to survive the neonatal period. Survival without profound neurologic disability ranges from 12 to 38%. Beneficence-based obligation to intervene is reasonable at these gestations. Nevertheless, autonomy of parents should also be respected, and parental consent should be sought prior to any intervention. Optimal counselling of parents involves harmonized cooperation of obstetric and neonatal care providers. Every fetus/neonate and every pregnant woman are different and have the right to be considered individually when treatment decisions are being made. MDPI 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10217697/ /pubmed/37238331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050784 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana Lucovnik, Miha Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability |
title | Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability |
title_full | Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability |
title_fullStr | Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability |
title_short | Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability |
title_sort | ethical dilemmas in neonatal care at the limit of viability |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050784 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kornhausercerarlilijana ethicaldilemmasinneonatalcareatthelimitofviability AT lucovnikmiha ethicaldilemmasinneonatalcareatthelimitofviability |