Cargando…

Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability

Advances in neonatal care have pushed the limit of viability to incrementally lower gestations over the last decades. However, surviving extremely premature neonates are prone to long-term neurodevelopmental handicaps. This makes ethics a crucial dimension of periviable birth management. At 22 weeks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana, Lucovnik, Miha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050784
_version_ 1785048599806083072
author Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana
Lucovnik, Miha
author_facet Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana
Lucovnik, Miha
author_sort Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana
collection PubMed
description Advances in neonatal care have pushed the limit of viability to incrementally lower gestations over the last decades. However, surviving extremely premature neonates are prone to long-term neurodevelopmental handicaps. This makes ethics a crucial dimension of periviable birth management. At 22 weeks, survival ranges from 1 to 15%, and profound disabilities in survivors are common. Consequently, there is no beneficence-based obligation to offer any aggressive perinatal management. At 23 weeks, survival ranges from 8 to 54%, and survival without severe handicap ranges from 7 to 23%. If fetal indication for cesarean delivery appears, the procedure may be offered when neonatal resuscitation is planned. At a gestational age ≥24 weeks, up to 51% neonates are expected to survive the neonatal period. Survival without profound neurologic disability ranges from 12 to 38%. Beneficence-based obligation to intervene is reasonable at these gestations. Nevertheless, autonomy of parents should also be respected, and parental consent should be sought prior to any intervention. Optimal counselling of parents involves harmonized cooperation of obstetric and neonatal care providers. Every fetus/neonate and every pregnant woman are different and have the right to be considered individually when treatment decisions are being made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10217697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102176972023-05-27 Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana Lucovnik, Miha Children (Basel) Review Advances in neonatal care have pushed the limit of viability to incrementally lower gestations over the last decades. However, surviving extremely premature neonates are prone to long-term neurodevelopmental handicaps. This makes ethics a crucial dimension of periviable birth management. At 22 weeks, survival ranges from 1 to 15%, and profound disabilities in survivors are common. Consequently, there is no beneficence-based obligation to offer any aggressive perinatal management. At 23 weeks, survival ranges from 8 to 54%, and survival without severe handicap ranges from 7 to 23%. If fetal indication for cesarean delivery appears, the procedure may be offered when neonatal resuscitation is planned. At a gestational age ≥24 weeks, up to 51% neonates are expected to survive the neonatal period. Survival without profound neurologic disability ranges from 12 to 38%. Beneficence-based obligation to intervene is reasonable at these gestations. Nevertheless, autonomy of parents should also be respected, and parental consent should be sought prior to any intervention. Optimal counselling of parents involves harmonized cooperation of obstetric and neonatal care providers. Every fetus/neonate and every pregnant woman are different and have the right to be considered individually when treatment decisions are being made. MDPI 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10217697/ /pubmed/37238331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050784 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kornhauser Cerar, Lilijana
Lucovnik, Miha
Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability
title Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability
title_full Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability
title_fullStr Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability
title_full_unstemmed Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability
title_short Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability
title_sort ethical dilemmas in neonatal care at the limit of viability
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050784
work_keys_str_mv AT kornhausercerarlilijana ethicaldilemmasinneonatalcareatthelimitofviability
AT lucovnikmiha ethicaldilemmasinneonatalcareatthelimitofviability