Cargando…

Different BD BACTEC(™) Blood Culture Bottle Types for the Detection of Fungi in Simulated Sterile Body Fluid Samples

Blood culture systems are a potential alternative to classical cultivation of fungi on mycological media, but there are limited data on the suitability of these systems for culturing other sample types (e.g., sterile body fluids). We conducted a prospective study to evaluate different types of blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomazin, Rok, Pliberšek, Tadej, Oštrbenk Valenčak, Anja, Matos, Tadeja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101699
_version_ 1785048601128337408
author Tomazin, Rok
Pliberšek, Tadej
Oštrbenk Valenčak, Anja
Matos, Tadeja
author_facet Tomazin, Rok
Pliberšek, Tadej
Oštrbenk Valenčak, Anja
Matos, Tadeja
author_sort Tomazin, Rok
collection PubMed
description Blood culture systems are a potential alternative to classical cultivation of fungi on mycological media, but there are limited data on the suitability of these systems for culturing other sample types (e.g., sterile body fluids). We conducted a prospective study to evaluate different types of blood culture (BC) bottles for the detection of different fungal species in non-blood samples. A total of 43 fungal isolates were tested for their ability to grow in BD BACTEC Mycosis-IC/F (Mycosis bottles), BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F (Aerobic bottles) and BD BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F (Anaerobic bottles) (Becton Dickinson, East Rutherford, NJ, USA) BC bottles inoculated with spiked samples without the addition of blood or fastidious organism supplement. Time to detection (TTD) was determined for all BC types tested and compared between groups. In general, Mycosis and Aerobic bottles were similar (p > 0.05). The Anaerobic bottles failed to support growth in >86% of cases. The Mycosis bottles were superior in detecting Candida glabrata, Cryptococcus spp. and Aspergillus spp. (p < 0.05). The performance of Mycosis and Aerobic bottles was similar, but if cryptococcosis or aspergillosis is suspected, the use of Mycosis bottles is recommended. Anaerobic bottles are not recommended for fungal detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10217702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102177022023-05-27 Different BD BACTEC(™) Blood Culture Bottle Types for the Detection of Fungi in Simulated Sterile Body Fluid Samples Tomazin, Rok Pliberšek, Tadej Oštrbenk Valenčak, Anja Matos, Tadeja Diagnostics (Basel) Article Blood culture systems are a potential alternative to classical cultivation of fungi on mycological media, but there are limited data on the suitability of these systems for culturing other sample types (e.g., sterile body fluids). We conducted a prospective study to evaluate different types of blood culture (BC) bottles for the detection of different fungal species in non-blood samples. A total of 43 fungal isolates were tested for their ability to grow in BD BACTEC Mycosis-IC/F (Mycosis bottles), BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F (Aerobic bottles) and BD BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F (Anaerobic bottles) (Becton Dickinson, East Rutherford, NJ, USA) BC bottles inoculated with spiked samples without the addition of blood or fastidious organism supplement. Time to detection (TTD) was determined for all BC types tested and compared between groups. In general, Mycosis and Aerobic bottles were similar (p > 0.05). The Anaerobic bottles failed to support growth in >86% of cases. The Mycosis bottles were superior in detecting Candida glabrata, Cryptococcus spp. and Aspergillus spp. (p < 0.05). The performance of Mycosis and Aerobic bottles was similar, but if cryptococcosis or aspergillosis is suspected, the use of Mycosis bottles is recommended. Anaerobic bottles are not recommended for fungal detection. MDPI 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10217702/ /pubmed/37238183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101699 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tomazin, Rok
Pliberšek, Tadej
Oštrbenk Valenčak, Anja
Matos, Tadeja
Different BD BACTEC(™) Blood Culture Bottle Types for the Detection of Fungi in Simulated Sterile Body Fluid Samples
title Different BD BACTEC(™) Blood Culture Bottle Types for the Detection of Fungi in Simulated Sterile Body Fluid Samples
title_full Different BD BACTEC(™) Blood Culture Bottle Types for the Detection of Fungi in Simulated Sterile Body Fluid Samples
title_fullStr Different BD BACTEC(™) Blood Culture Bottle Types for the Detection of Fungi in Simulated Sterile Body Fluid Samples
title_full_unstemmed Different BD BACTEC(™) Blood Culture Bottle Types for the Detection of Fungi in Simulated Sterile Body Fluid Samples
title_short Different BD BACTEC(™) Blood Culture Bottle Types for the Detection of Fungi in Simulated Sterile Body Fluid Samples
title_sort different bd bactec(™) blood culture bottle types for the detection of fungi in simulated sterile body fluid samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37238183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101699
work_keys_str_mv AT tomazinrok differentbdbactecbloodculturebottletypesforthedetectionoffungiinsimulatedsterilebodyfluidsamples
AT plibersektadej differentbdbactecbloodculturebottletypesforthedetectionoffungiinsimulatedsterilebodyfluidsamples
AT ostrbenkvalencakanja differentbdbactecbloodculturebottletypesforthedetectionoffungiinsimulatedsterilebodyfluidsamples
AT matostadeja differentbdbactecbloodculturebottletypesforthedetectionoffungiinsimulatedsterilebodyfluidsamples