Cargando…
Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities
Objective: Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. It is vital to achieve a high cervical cancer screening rate among women. We compared the Pap smear test (PST) used between individuals with disabilities and those without disabilities in Taiwan. Methods: Individuals...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101363 |
_version_ | 1785048644322328576 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Chia-Yu Kung, Pei-Tseng Chiu, Li-Ting Tsai, Wen-Chen |
author_facet | Chen, Chia-Yu Kung, Pei-Tseng Chiu, Li-Ting Tsai, Wen-Chen |
author_sort | Chen, Chia-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. It is vital to achieve a high cervical cancer screening rate among women. We compared the Pap smear test (PST) used between individuals with disabilities and those without disabilities in Taiwan. Methods: Individuals registered in the Taiwan Disability Registration File and the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) were screened for this nationally representative retrospective cohort study. Women aged 30 and above in 2016 and who were still alive in 2016 were matched in a 1:1 ratio via propensity score matching (PSM); 186,717 individuals with disabilities and 186,717 individuals without disabilities were included. Controlling for relevant variables, the odds of receiving PST were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results: A lower percentage of individuals with disabilities (16.93%) received PST than those without disabilities (21.82%). The odds of individuals with disabilities receiving PST were 0.74 times that of individuals without disabilities (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.73–0.76). Compared to individuals without disabilities, individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities had the lower odds of receiving PST (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.36–0.40), followed by individuals with dementia (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.33–0.48) or multiple disabilities (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.49–0.54). Conclusions: We highly recommend that healthcare practitioners recognize the unique needs of individuals with different types of disabilities, especially those with cognitive impairments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10217891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102178912023-05-27 Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities Chen, Chia-Yu Kung, Pei-Tseng Chiu, Li-Ting Tsai, Wen-Chen Healthcare (Basel) Article Objective: Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. It is vital to achieve a high cervical cancer screening rate among women. We compared the Pap smear test (PST) used between individuals with disabilities and those without disabilities in Taiwan. Methods: Individuals registered in the Taiwan Disability Registration File and the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) were screened for this nationally representative retrospective cohort study. Women aged 30 and above in 2016 and who were still alive in 2016 were matched in a 1:1 ratio via propensity score matching (PSM); 186,717 individuals with disabilities and 186,717 individuals without disabilities were included. Controlling for relevant variables, the odds of receiving PST were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results: A lower percentage of individuals with disabilities (16.93%) received PST than those without disabilities (21.82%). The odds of individuals with disabilities receiving PST were 0.74 times that of individuals without disabilities (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.73–0.76). Compared to individuals without disabilities, individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities had the lower odds of receiving PST (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.36–0.40), followed by individuals with dementia (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.33–0.48) or multiple disabilities (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.49–0.54). Conclusions: We highly recommend that healthcare practitioners recognize the unique needs of individuals with different types of disabilities, especially those with cognitive impairments. MDPI 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10217891/ /pubmed/37239649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101363 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Chia-Yu Kung, Pei-Tseng Chiu, Li-Ting Tsai, Wen-Chen Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities |
title | Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities |
title_full | Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities |
title_short | Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities |
title_sort | comparison of cervical cancer screening used between individuals with disabilities and individuals without disabilities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenchiayu comparisonofcervicalcancerscreeningusedbetweenindividualswithdisabilitiesandindividualswithoutdisabilities AT kungpeitseng comparisonofcervicalcancerscreeningusedbetweenindividualswithdisabilitiesandindividualswithoutdisabilities AT chiuliting comparisonofcervicalcancerscreeningusedbetweenindividualswithdisabilitiesandindividualswithoutdisabilities AT tsaiwenchen comparisonofcervicalcancerscreeningusedbetweenindividualswithdisabilitiesandindividualswithoutdisabilities |