Cargando…

Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities

Objective: Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. It is vital to achieve a high cervical cancer screening rate among women. We compared the Pap smear test (PST) used between individuals with disabilities and those without disabilities in Taiwan. Methods: Individuals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chia-Yu, Kung, Pei-Tseng, Chiu, Li-Ting, Tsai, Wen-Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101363
_version_ 1785048644322328576
author Chen, Chia-Yu
Kung, Pei-Tseng
Chiu, Li-Ting
Tsai, Wen-Chen
author_facet Chen, Chia-Yu
Kung, Pei-Tseng
Chiu, Li-Ting
Tsai, Wen-Chen
author_sort Chen, Chia-Yu
collection PubMed
description Objective: Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. It is vital to achieve a high cervical cancer screening rate among women. We compared the Pap smear test (PST) used between individuals with disabilities and those without disabilities in Taiwan. Methods: Individuals registered in the Taiwan Disability Registration File and the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) were screened for this nationally representative retrospective cohort study. Women aged 30 and above in 2016 and who were still alive in 2016 were matched in a 1:1 ratio via propensity score matching (PSM); 186,717 individuals with disabilities and 186,717 individuals without disabilities were included. Controlling for relevant variables, the odds of receiving PST were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results: A lower percentage of individuals with disabilities (16.93%) received PST than those without disabilities (21.82%). The odds of individuals with disabilities receiving PST were 0.74 times that of individuals without disabilities (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.73–0.76). Compared to individuals without disabilities, individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities had the lower odds of receiving PST (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.36–0.40), followed by individuals with dementia (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.33–0.48) or multiple disabilities (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.49–0.54). Conclusions: We highly recommend that healthcare practitioners recognize the unique needs of individuals with different types of disabilities, especially those with cognitive impairments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10217891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102178912023-05-27 Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities Chen, Chia-Yu Kung, Pei-Tseng Chiu, Li-Ting Tsai, Wen-Chen Healthcare (Basel) Article Objective: Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. It is vital to achieve a high cervical cancer screening rate among women. We compared the Pap smear test (PST) used between individuals with disabilities and those without disabilities in Taiwan. Methods: Individuals registered in the Taiwan Disability Registration File and the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) were screened for this nationally representative retrospective cohort study. Women aged 30 and above in 2016 and who were still alive in 2016 were matched in a 1:1 ratio via propensity score matching (PSM); 186,717 individuals with disabilities and 186,717 individuals without disabilities were included. Controlling for relevant variables, the odds of receiving PST were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results: A lower percentage of individuals with disabilities (16.93%) received PST than those without disabilities (21.82%). The odds of individuals with disabilities receiving PST were 0.74 times that of individuals without disabilities (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.73–0.76). Compared to individuals without disabilities, individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities had the lower odds of receiving PST (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.36–0.40), followed by individuals with dementia (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.33–0.48) or multiple disabilities (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.49–0.54). Conclusions: We highly recommend that healthcare practitioners recognize the unique needs of individuals with different types of disabilities, especially those with cognitive impairments. MDPI 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10217891/ /pubmed/37239649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101363 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Chia-Yu
Kung, Pei-Tseng
Chiu, Li-Ting
Tsai, Wen-Chen
Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities
title Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities
title_full Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities
title_fullStr Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities
title_short Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities
title_sort comparison of cervical cancer screening used between individuals with disabilities and individuals without disabilities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101363
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchiayu comparisonofcervicalcancerscreeningusedbetweenindividualswithdisabilitiesandindividualswithoutdisabilities
AT kungpeitseng comparisonofcervicalcancerscreeningusedbetweenindividualswithdisabilitiesandindividualswithoutdisabilities
AT chiuliting comparisonofcervicalcancerscreeningusedbetweenindividualswithdisabilitiesandindividualswithoutdisabilities
AT tsaiwenchen comparisonofcervicalcancerscreeningusedbetweenindividualswithdisabilitiesandindividualswithoutdisabilities