Cargando…

Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements for the estimation of %Fat when compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). The secondary aim was to develop a new SFT-based body fat equation (SFT(NICKE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nickerson, Brett S., Esco, Michael R., Schaefer, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105831
_version_ 1785048645989564416
author Nickerson, Brett S.
Esco, Michael R.
Schaefer, George
author_facet Nickerson, Brett S.
Esco, Michael R.
Schaefer, George
author_sort Nickerson, Brett S.
collection PubMed
description The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements for the estimation of %Fat when compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). The secondary aim was to develop a new SFT-based body fat equation (SFT(NICKERSON)). SFT-based %Fat was estimated using a body fat equation from González-Agüero (SFT(G-A)) and body density conversion formulas from Siri (SFT(SIRI)) and Brozek (SFT(BROZEK)). Criterion %Fat was measured via DXA. SFT(G-A), SFT(SIRI), and SFT(BROZEK) were significantly lower than DXA (mean differences ranged from −7.59 to −13.51%; all p < 0.001). The SEE values ranged from 3.47% (SFT(BROZEK)) to 8.60% (SFT(G-A)). The 95% limits of agreement were greater than ±10% for all comparisons. Mid-axilla and suprailium were significant predictors of %Fat (both p < 0.05). %Fat SFT(NICKERSON) = 10.323 + (0.661 × mid-axilla) + (0.712 × suprailium). Age and all other skinfold sites were not statically significant in the regression model (all p > 0.05). Current findings indicate that SFT(G-A), SFT(SIRI), and SFT(BROZEK) erroneously place an individual with excessive adiposity in a normal healthy range. Accordingly, the current study developed a new equation (SFT(NICKERSON)) that can easily be administered in people with DS in a quick and efficient time frame. However, further research is warranted in this area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10217898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102178982023-05-27 Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation Nickerson, Brett S. Esco, Michael R. Schaefer, George Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements for the estimation of %Fat when compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). The secondary aim was to develop a new SFT-based body fat equation (SFT(NICKERSON)). SFT-based %Fat was estimated using a body fat equation from González-Agüero (SFT(G-A)) and body density conversion formulas from Siri (SFT(SIRI)) and Brozek (SFT(BROZEK)). Criterion %Fat was measured via DXA. SFT(G-A), SFT(SIRI), and SFT(BROZEK) were significantly lower than DXA (mean differences ranged from −7.59 to −13.51%; all p < 0.001). The SEE values ranged from 3.47% (SFT(BROZEK)) to 8.60% (SFT(G-A)). The 95% limits of agreement were greater than ±10% for all comparisons. Mid-axilla and suprailium were significant predictors of %Fat (both p < 0.05). %Fat SFT(NICKERSON) = 10.323 + (0.661 × mid-axilla) + (0.712 × suprailium). Age and all other skinfold sites were not statically significant in the regression model (all p > 0.05). Current findings indicate that SFT(G-A), SFT(SIRI), and SFT(BROZEK) erroneously place an individual with excessive adiposity in a normal healthy range. Accordingly, the current study developed a new equation (SFT(NICKERSON)) that can easily be administered in people with DS in a quick and efficient time frame. However, further research is warranted in this area. MDPI 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10217898/ /pubmed/37239557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105831 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nickerson, Brett S.
Esco, Michael R.
Schaefer, George
Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation
title Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation
title_full Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation
title_fullStr Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation
title_short Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation
title_sort evaluation of skinfold techniques in people with down syndrome: development of a new equation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105831
work_keys_str_mv AT nickersonbretts evaluationofskinfoldtechniquesinpeoplewithdownsyndromedevelopmentofanewequation
AT escomichaelr evaluationofskinfoldtechniquesinpeoplewithdownsyndromedevelopmentofanewequation
AT schaefergeorge evaluationofskinfoldtechniquesinpeoplewithdownsyndromedevelopmentofanewequation