Cargando…
Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements for the estimation of %Fat when compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). The secondary aim was to develop a new SFT-based body fat equation (SFT(NICKE...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105831 |
_version_ | 1785048645989564416 |
---|---|
author | Nickerson, Brett S. Esco, Michael R. Schaefer, George |
author_facet | Nickerson, Brett S. Esco, Michael R. Schaefer, George |
author_sort | Nickerson, Brett S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements for the estimation of %Fat when compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). The secondary aim was to develop a new SFT-based body fat equation (SFT(NICKERSON)). SFT-based %Fat was estimated using a body fat equation from González-Agüero (SFT(G-A)) and body density conversion formulas from Siri (SFT(SIRI)) and Brozek (SFT(BROZEK)). Criterion %Fat was measured via DXA. SFT(G-A), SFT(SIRI), and SFT(BROZEK) were significantly lower than DXA (mean differences ranged from −7.59 to −13.51%; all p < 0.001). The SEE values ranged from 3.47% (SFT(BROZEK)) to 8.60% (SFT(G-A)). The 95% limits of agreement were greater than ±10% for all comparisons. Mid-axilla and suprailium were significant predictors of %Fat (both p < 0.05). %Fat SFT(NICKERSON) = 10.323 + (0.661 × mid-axilla) + (0.712 × suprailium). Age and all other skinfold sites were not statically significant in the regression model (all p > 0.05). Current findings indicate that SFT(G-A), SFT(SIRI), and SFT(BROZEK) erroneously place an individual with excessive adiposity in a normal healthy range. Accordingly, the current study developed a new equation (SFT(NICKERSON)) that can easily be administered in people with DS in a quick and efficient time frame. However, further research is warranted in this area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10217898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102178982023-05-27 Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation Nickerson, Brett S. Esco, Michael R. Schaefer, George Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements for the estimation of %Fat when compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). The secondary aim was to develop a new SFT-based body fat equation (SFT(NICKERSON)). SFT-based %Fat was estimated using a body fat equation from González-Agüero (SFT(G-A)) and body density conversion formulas from Siri (SFT(SIRI)) and Brozek (SFT(BROZEK)). Criterion %Fat was measured via DXA. SFT(G-A), SFT(SIRI), and SFT(BROZEK) were significantly lower than DXA (mean differences ranged from −7.59 to −13.51%; all p < 0.001). The SEE values ranged from 3.47% (SFT(BROZEK)) to 8.60% (SFT(G-A)). The 95% limits of agreement were greater than ±10% for all comparisons. Mid-axilla and suprailium were significant predictors of %Fat (both p < 0.05). %Fat SFT(NICKERSON) = 10.323 + (0.661 × mid-axilla) + (0.712 × suprailium). Age and all other skinfold sites were not statically significant in the regression model (all p > 0.05). Current findings indicate that SFT(G-A), SFT(SIRI), and SFT(BROZEK) erroneously place an individual with excessive adiposity in a normal healthy range. Accordingly, the current study developed a new equation (SFT(NICKERSON)) that can easily be administered in people with DS in a quick and efficient time frame. However, further research is warranted in this area. MDPI 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10217898/ /pubmed/37239557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105831 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nickerson, Brett S. Esco, Michael R. Schaefer, George Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation |
title | Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation |
title_full | Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation |
title_short | Evaluation of Skinfold Techniques in People with Down Syndrome: Development of a New Equation |
title_sort | evaluation of skinfold techniques in people with down syndrome: development of a new equation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nickersonbretts evaluationofskinfoldtechniquesinpeoplewithdownsyndromedevelopmentofanewequation AT escomichaelr evaluationofskinfoldtechniquesinpeoplewithdownsyndromedevelopmentofanewequation AT schaefergeorge evaluationofskinfoldtechniquesinpeoplewithdownsyndromedevelopmentofanewequation |