Cargando…

Perceptual History Biases Are Predicted by Early Visual-Evoked Activity

What we see in the present is affected by what we saw in the recent past. Serial dependence, a bias making a current stimulus appear more similar to a previous one, has been indeed shown to be ubiquitous in vision. At the neural level, serial dependence is accompanied by a signature of stimulus hist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fornaciai, Michele, Togoli, Irene, Bueti, Domenica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1451-22.2023
_version_ 1785048675914874880
author Fornaciai, Michele
Togoli, Irene
Bueti, Domenica
author_facet Fornaciai, Michele
Togoli, Irene
Bueti, Domenica
author_sort Fornaciai, Michele
collection PubMed
description What we see in the present is affected by what we saw in the recent past. Serial dependence, a bias making a current stimulus appear more similar to a previous one, has been indeed shown to be ubiquitous in vision. At the neural level, serial dependence is accompanied by a signature of stimulus history (i.e., past stimulus information) emerging from early visual-evoked activity. However, whether this neural signature effectively reflects the behavioral bias is unclear. Here we address this question by assessing the neural (electrophysiological) and behavioral signature of stimulus history in human subjects (both male and female), in the context of numerosity, duration, and size perception. First, our results show that while the behavioral effect is task-dependent, its neural signature also reflects task-irrelevant dimensions of a past stimulus, suggesting a partial dissociation between the mechanisms mediating the encoding of stimulus history and the behavioral bias itself. Second, we show that performing a task is not a necessary condition to observe the neural signature of stimulus history, but that in the presence of an active task such a signature is significantly amplified. Finally, and more importantly, we show that the pattern of brain activity in a relatively early latency window (starting at ∼35-65 ms after stimulus onset) significantly predicts the behavioral effect. Overall, our results thus demonstrate that the encoding of past stimulus information in neural signals does indeed reflect serial dependence, and that serial dependence occurs at a relatively early level of visual processing. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT What we perceive is determined not only by the information reaching our sensory organs, but also by the context in which the information is embedded. What we saw in the recent past (perceptual history) can indeed modulate the perception of a current stimulus in an attractive way, a bias that is ubiquitous in vision. Here we show that this bias can be predicted by the pattern of brain activity reflecting the encoding of past stimulus information, very early after the onset of a stimulus. This in turn suggests that the integration of past and present sensory information mediating the attractive bias occurs early in the visual processing stream, and likely involves early visual cortices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10218026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102180262023-05-27 Perceptual History Biases Are Predicted by Early Visual-Evoked Activity Fornaciai, Michele Togoli, Irene Bueti, Domenica J Neurosci Research Articles What we see in the present is affected by what we saw in the recent past. Serial dependence, a bias making a current stimulus appear more similar to a previous one, has been indeed shown to be ubiquitous in vision. At the neural level, serial dependence is accompanied by a signature of stimulus history (i.e., past stimulus information) emerging from early visual-evoked activity. However, whether this neural signature effectively reflects the behavioral bias is unclear. Here we address this question by assessing the neural (electrophysiological) and behavioral signature of stimulus history in human subjects (both male and female), in the context of numerosity, duration, and size perception. First, our results show that while the behavioral effect is task-dependent, its neural signature also reflects task-irrelevant dimensions of a past stimulus, suggesting a partial dissociation between the mechanisms mediating the encoding of stimulus history and the behavioral bias itself. Second, we show that performing a task is not a necessary condition to observe the neural signature of stimulus history, but that in the presence of an active task such a signature is significantly amplified. Finally, and more importantly, we show that the pattern of brain activity in a relatively early latency window (starting at ∼35-65 ms after stimulus onset) significantly predicts the behavioral effect. Overall, our results thus demonstrate that the encoding of past stimulus information in neural signals does indeed reflect serial dependence, and that serial dependence occurs at a relatively early level of visual processing. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT What we perceive is determined not only by the information reaching our sensory organs, but also by the context in which the information is embedded. What we saw in the recent past (perceptual history) can indeed modulate the perception of a current stimulus in an attractive way, a bias that is ubiquitous in vision. Here we show that this bias can be predicted by the pattern of brain activity reflecting the encoding of past stimulus information, very early after the onset of a stimulus. This in turn suggests that the integration of past and present sensory information mediating the attractive bias occurs early in the visual processing stream, and likely involves early visual cortices. Society for Neuroscience 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10218026/ /pubmed/37085319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1451-22.2023 Text en Copyright © 2023 Fornaciai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Fornaciai, Michele
Togoli, Irene
Bueti, Domenica
Perceptual History Biases Are Predicted by Early Visual-Evoked Activity
title Perceptual History Biases Are Predicted by Early Visual-Evoked Activity
title_full Perceptual History Biases Are Predicted by Early Visual-Evoked Activity
title_fullStr Perceptual History Biases Are Predicted by Early Visual-Evoked Activity
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual History Biases Are Predicted by Early Visual-Evoked Activity
title_short Perceptual History Biases Are Predicted by Early Visual-Evoked Activity
title_sort perceptual history biases are predicted by early visual-evoked activity
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1451-22.2023
work_keys_str_mv AT fornaciaimichele perceptualhistorybiasesarepredictedbyearlyvisualevokedactivity
AT togoliirene perceptualhistorybiasesarepredictedbyearlyvisualevokedactivity
AT buetidomenica perceptualhistorybiasesarepredictedbyearlyvisualevokedactivity