Cargando…
Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies
Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in twin gestations has been shown to have high detection rates and low false-positive rates for trisomy 21, as seen in singleton pregnancies, although there have been few large cohort twin studies, genome-wide studies in particular, to date. In this study, we l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14050982 |
_version_ | 1785048678294093824 |
---|---|
author | De Falco, Luigia Savarese, Giovanni Savarese, Pasquale Petrillo, Nadia Ianniello, Monica Ruggiero, Raffaella Suero, Teresa Barbato, Cosimo Mori, Alessio Ramiro, Cristina Della Corte, Luigi Saccone, Gabriele Di Spiezio Sardo, Attilio Fico, Antonio |
author_facet | De Falco, Luigia Savarese, Giovanni Savarese, Pasquale Petrillo, Nadia Ianniello, Monica Ruggiero, Raffaella Suero, Teresa Barbato, Cosimo Mori, Alessio Ramiro, Cristina Della Corte, Luigi Saccone, Gabriele Di Spiezio Sardo, Attilio Fico, Antonio |
author_sort | De Falco, Luigia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in twin gestations has been shown to have high detection rates and low false-positive rates for trisomy 21, as seen in singleton pregnancies, although there have been few large cohort twin studies, genome-wide studies in particular, to date. In this study, we looked at the performance of genome-wide NIPT in a large cohort consisting of 1244 twin pregnancy samples collected over a two-year period in a single laboratory in Italy. All samples underwent an NIPS for common trisomies, with 61.5% of study participants choosing to undergo genome-wide NIPS for additional fetal anomalies (namely, rare autosomal aneuploidies and CNVs). There were nine initial no-call results, all of which were resolved upon retest. Based on our NIPS results, 17 samples were at high risk for trisomy 21, one for trisomy 18, six for a rare autosomal aneuploidy, and four for a CNV. Clinical follow-up was available for 27 out of 29 high-risk cases; a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.9%, and a PPV of 94.4% were noted for trisomy 21. Clinical follow-up was also available for 1110 (96.6%) of the low-risk cases, all of which were true negatives. In conclusion, we found that NIPS was a reliable screening approach for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10218036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102180362023-05-27 Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies De Falco, Luigia Savarese, Giovanni Savarese, Pasquale Petrillo, Nadia Ianniello, Monica Ruggiero, Raffaella Suero, Teresa Barbato, Cosimo Mori, Alessio Ramiro, Cristina Della Corte, Luigi Saccone, Gabriele Di Spiezio Sardo, Attilio Fico, Antonio Genes (Basel) Article Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in twin gestations has been shown to have high detection rates and low false-positive rates for trisomy 21, as seen in singleton pregnancies, although there have been few large cohort twin studies, genome-wide studies in particular, to date. In this study, we looked at the performance of genome-wide NIPT in a large cohort consisting of 1244 twin pregnancy samples collected over a two-year period in a single laboratory in Italy. All samples underwent an NIPS for common trisomies, with 61.5% of study participants choosing to undergo genome-wide NIPS for additional fetal anomalies (namely, rare autosomal aneuploidies and CNVs). There were nine initial no-call results, all of which were resolved upon retest. Based on our NIPS results, 17 samples were at high risk for trisomy 21, one for trisomy 18, six for a rare autosomal aneuploidy, and four for a CNV. Clinical follow-up was available for 27 out of 29 high-risk cases; a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.9%, and a PPV of 94.4% were noted for trisomy 21. Clinical follow-up was also available for 1110 (96.6%) of the low-risk cases, all of which were true negatives. In conclusion, we found that NIPS was a reliable screening approach for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies. MDPI 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10218036/ /pubmed/37239342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14050982 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article De Falco, Luigia Savarese, Giovanni Savarese, Pasquale Petrillo, Nadia Ianniello, Monica Ruggiero, Raffaella Suero, Teresa Barbato, Cosimo Mori, Alessio Ramiro, Cristina Della Corte, Luigi Saccone, Gabriele Di Spiezio Sardo, Attilio Fico, Antonio Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies |
title | Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies |
title_full | Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies |
title_fullStr | Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies |
title_short | Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies |
title_sort | clinical experience with genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening in a large cohort of twin pregnancies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14050982 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT defalcoluigia clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT savaresegiovanni clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT savaresepasquale clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT petrillonadia clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT ianniellomonica clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT ruggieroraffaella clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT sueroteresa clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT barbatocosimo clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT morialessio clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT ramirocristina clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT dellacorteluigi clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT sacconegabriele clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT dispieziosardoattilio clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies AT ficoantonio clinicalexperiencewithgenomewidenoninvasiveprenatalscreeninginalargecohortoftwinpregnancies |