Cargando…
New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing
(1) Background: Immunological laboratory testing is known to be complex, and it is usually performed in tertiary referral centers. Many criticalities affect diagnostic immunological testing, such as limited availability, the need for specifically trained laboratory staff, and potential difficulties...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105782 |
_version_ | 1785048694636150784 |
---|---|
author | Foddai, Silvia Grazietta Radin, Massimo Barinotti, Alice Cecchi, Irene Rubini, Elena Arbrile, Marta Mantello, Ester Menegatti, Elisa Roccatello, Dario Sciascia, Savino |
author_facet | Foddai, Silvia Grazietta Radin, Massimo Barinotti, Alice Cecchi, Irene Rubini, Elena Arbrile, Marta Mantello, Ester Menegatti, Elisa Roccatello, Dario Sciascia, Savino |
author_sort | Foddai, Silvia Grazietta |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Immunological laboratory testing is known to be complex, and it is usually performed in tertiary referral centers. Many criticalities affect diagnostic immunological testing, such as limited availability, the need for specifically trained laboratory staff, and potential difficulties in collecting blood samples, especially in the most vulnerable patients, i.e., the elderly and children. For this reason, the identification of a new feasible and reliable methodology for autoantibody detection is urgently needed. (2) Methods: We designed a systematic review to investigate the available literature on the utilization of saliva samples for immunological testing. (3) Results: A total of 170 articles were identified. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 1059 patients and 671 controls. The saliva collection method was mostly represented by passive drooling (11/18, 61%), and the most frequently described methodology for antibody detection was ELISA (12/18, 67%). The analysis included 392 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 161 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 131 with type 1 diabetes mellitus, 116 with primary biliary cholangitis, 100 with pemphigus vulgaris, 50 with bullous pemphigoids, 49 with Sjogren syndrome, 39 with celiac disease, 10 with primary antiphospholipid syndromes, 8 with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, 2 with systemic sclerosis, and 1 with autoimmune thyroiditis. The majority of the reviewed studies involved adequate controls, and saliva testing allowed for a clear distinction of patients (10/12 studies, 83%). More than half of the papers showed a correlation between saliva and serum results (10/18, 55%) for autoantibody detection, with varying rates of correlation, sensitivity, and specificity. Interestingly, many papers showed a correlation between saliva antibody results and clinical manifestations. (4) Conclusions: Saliva testing might represent an appealing alternative to serum-based testing for autoantibody detection, considering the correspondence with serum testing results and the correlation with clinical manifestations. Nonetheless, standardization of sample collection processing, maintenance, and detection methodology has yet to be fully addressed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10218106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102181062023-05-27 New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing Foddai, Silvia Grazietta Radin, Massimo Barinotti, Alice Cecchi, Irene Rubini, Elena Arbrile, Marta Mantello, Ester Menegatti, Elisa Roccatello, Dario Sciascia, Savino Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review (1) Background: Immunological laboratory testing is known to be complex, and it is usually performed in tertiary referral centers. Many criticalities affect diagnostic immunological testing, such as limited availability, the need for specifically trained laboratory staff, and potential difficulties in collecting blood samples, especially in the most vulnerable patients, i.e., the elderly and children. For this reason, the identification of a new feasible and reliable methodology for autoantibody detection is urgently needed. (2) Methods: We designed a systematic review to investigate the available literature on the utilization of saliva samples for immunological testing. (3) Results: A total of 170 articles were identified. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 1059 patients and 671 controls. The saliva collection method was mostly represented by passive drooling (11/18, 61%), and the most frequently described methodology for antibody detection was ELISA (12/18, 67%). The analysis included 392 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 161 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 131 with type 1 diabetes mellitus, 116 with primary biliary cholangitis, 100 with pemphigus vulgaris, 50 with bullous pemphigoids, 49 with Sjogren syndrome, 39 with celiac disease, 10 with primary antiphospholipid syndromes, 8 with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, 2 with systemic sclerosis, and 1 with autoimmune thyroiditis. The majority of the reviewed studies involved adequate controls, and saliva testing allowed for a clear distinction of patients (10/12 studies, 83%). More than half of the papers showed a correlation between saliva and serum results (10/18, 55%) for autoantibody detection, with varying rates of correlation, sensitivity, and specificity. Interestingly, many papers showed a correlation between saliva antibody results and clinical manifestations. (4) Conclusions: Saliva testing might represent an appealing alternative to serum-based testing for autoantibody detection, considering the correspondence with serum testing results and the correlation with clinical manifestations. Nonetheless, standardization of sample collection processing, maintenance, and detection methodology has yet to be fully addressed. MDPI 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10218106/ /pubmed/37239511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105782 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Foddai, Silvia Grazietta Radin, Massimo Barinotti, Alice Cecchi, Irene Rubini, Elena Arbrile, Marta Mantello, Ester Menegatti, Elisa Roccatello, Dario Sciascia, Savino New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing |
title | New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing |
title_full | New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing |
title_fullStr | New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing |
title_short | New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing |
title_sort | new frontiers in autoimmune diagnostics: a systematic review on saliva testing |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37239511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105782 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foddaisilviagrazietta newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting AT radinmassimo newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting AT barinottialice newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting AT cecchiirene newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting AT rubinielena newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting AT arbrilemarta newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting AT mantelloester newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting AT menegattielisa newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting AT roccatellodario newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting AT sciasciasavino newfrontiersinautoimmunediagnosticsasystematicreviewonsalivatesting |