Cargando…

The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic-post stroke hemiplegia–A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Traditionally both rESWT and TENS are used in treating post-stroke upper limb spasticity over years and their effectiveness had been assessed disjointedly. However, these methods were not yet compared for superiority. OBJECTIVES: To compare rESWT vs TENS to assess their effectiveness in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senarath, Iresha Dilhari, Thalwathte, Randika Dinesh, Pathirage, Manoji, Kularatne, Senanayake A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283321
_version_ 1785048847460859904
author Senarath, Iresha Dilhari
Thalwathte, Randika Dinesh
Pathirage, Manoji
Kularatne, Senanayake A. M.
author_facet Senarath, Iresha Dilhari
Thalwathte, Randika Dinesh
Pathirage, Manoji
Kularatne, Senanayake A. M.
author_sort Senarath, Iresha Dilhari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditionally both rESWT and TENS are used in treating post-stroke upper limb spasticity over years and their effectiveness had been assessed disjointedly. However, these methods were not yet compared for superiority. OBJECTIVES: To compare rESWT vs TENS to assess their effectiveness in different parameters of stroke such as stroke type, gender, and the affected side. METHODS: The experimental group was treated with rESWT application to the middle of the muscle belly of Teres major, Brachialis, Flexor carpi ulnaris, and Flexor digitorum profundus muscles using 1500 shots per muscle, frequency of 5Hz, energy of 0.030 mJ/mm. The TENS was applied to the same muscles in the control group using 100 Hz for 15 minutes. Assessments were taken at the baseline (T0), immediately after first application (T1), and at the end of four-week protocol (T2). RESULTS: Patients 106 with a mean age of 63.87±7.052 years were equally divided into rESWT (53) and TENS (53) groups including 62 males, 44 females, 74 ischemic, 32 hemorrhagic, affecting 68 right, and 38 left. Statistical analysis has revealed significant differences at T1 and T2 in both groups. But at T2 compared to T0; the rESWT group has reduced spasticity 4.8 times (95% CI 1.956 to 2.195) while TENS reduced by 2.6 times (95% CI 1.351 to 1.668), improved voluntary control by 3.9 times (95% CI 2.314 to 2.667) and it was 3.2 times (95% CI 1.829 to 2.171) in TENS group. Improvement of the hand functions of the rESWT group was 3.8 times in FMA-UL (95% CI 19.549 to 22.602) and 5.5 times in ARAT (95% CI 22.453 to 24.792) while thrice (95% CI 14.587 to 17.488) and 4.1 times (95% CI 16.019 to 18.283) in TENS group respectively. CONCLUSION: The rESWT modality is superior compared to the TENS modality for treating chronic post-stroke spastic upper limb.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10218748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102187482023-05-27 The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic-post stroke hemiplegia–A randomized controlled trial Senarath, Iresha Dilhari Thalwathte, Randika Dinesh Pathirage, Manoji Kularatne, Senanayake A. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Traditionally both rESWT and TENS are used in treating post-stroke upper limb spasticity over years and their effectiveness had been assessed disjointedly. However, these methods were not yet compared for superiority. OBJECTIVES: To compare rESWT vs TENS to assess their effectiveness in different parameters of stroke such as stroke type, gender, and the affected side. METHODS: The experimental group was treated with rESWT application to the middle of the muscle belly of Teres major, Brachialis, Flexor carpi ulnaris, and Flexor digitorum profundus muscles using 1500 shots per muscle, frequency of 5Hz, energy of 0.030 mJ/mm. The TENS was applied to the same muscles in the control group using 100 Hz for 15 minutes. Assessments were taken at the baseline (T0), immediately after first application (T1), and at the end of four-week protocol (T2). RESULTS: Patients 106 with a mean age of 63.87±7.052 years were equally divided into rESWT (53) and TENS (53) groups including 62 males, 44 females, 74 ischemic, 32 hemorrhagic, affecting 68 right, and 38 left. Statistical analysis has revealed significant differences at T1 and T2 in both groups. But at T2 compared to T0; the rESWT group has reduced spasticity 4.8 times (95% CI 1.956 to 2.195) while TENS reduced by 2.6 times (95% CI 1.351 to 1.668), improved voluntary control by 3.9 times (95% CI 2.314 to 2.667) and it was 3.2 times (95% CI 1.829 to 2.171) in TENS group. Improvement of the hand functions of the rESWT group was 3.8 times in FMA-UL (95% CI 19.549 to 22.602) and 5.5 times in ARAT (95% CI 22.453 to 24.792) while thrice (95% CI 14.587 to 17.488) and 4.1 times (95% CI 16.019 to 18.283) in TENS group respectively. CONCLUSION: The rESWT modality is superior compared to the TENS modality for treating chronic post-stroke spastic upper limb. Public Library of Science 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10218748/ /pubmed/37235581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283321 Text en © 2023 Senarath et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Senarath, Iresha Dilhari
Thalwathte, Randika Dinesh
Pathirage, Manoji
Kularatne, Senanayake A. M.
The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic-post stroke hemiplegia–A randomized controlled trial
title The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic-post stroke hemiplegia–A randomized controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic-post stroke hemiplegia–A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic-post stroke hemiplegia–A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic-post stroke hemiplegia–A randomized controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic-post stroke hemiplegia–A randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic-post stroke hemiplegia–a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283321
work_keys_str_mv AT senarathireshadilhari theeffectivenessofradialextracorporealshockwavetherapyvstranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinthemanagementofupperlimbspasticityinchronicpoststrokehemiplegiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thalwathterandikadinesh theeffectivenessofradialextracorporealshockwavetherapyvstranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinthemanagementofupperlimbspasticityinchronicpoststrokehemiplegiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pathiragemanoji theeffectivenessofradialextracorporealshockwavetherapyvstranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinthemanagementofupperlimbspasticityinchronicpoststrokehemiplegiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kularatnesenanayakeam theeffectivenessofradialextracorporealshockwavetherapyvstranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinthemanagementofupperlimbspasticityinchronicpoststrokehemiplegiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT senarathireshadilhari effectivenessofradialextracorporealshockwavetherapyvstranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinthemanagementofupperlimbspasticityinchronicpoststrokehemiplegiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thalwathterandikadinesh effectivenessofradialextracorporealshockwavetherapyvstranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinthemanagementofupperlimbspasticityinchronicpoststrokehemiplegiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pathiragemanoji effectivenessofradialextracorporealshockwavetherapyvstranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinthemanagementofupperlimbspasticityinchronicpoststrokehemiplegiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kularatnesenanayakeam effectivenessofradialextracorporealshockwavetherapyvstranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinthemanagementofupperlimbspasticityinchronicpoststrokehemiplegiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial