Cargando…

The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed Amber(®) Resin’s Mechanical Properties

Currently, 3D print is becoming more common in all branches of medicine, including dentistry. Some novel resins, such as BioMed Amber (Formlabs), are used and incorporated to more advanced techniques. The aims of the study were to check whether or not polishing and/or artificial aging influences the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna, Mikulewicz, Marcin, Wieckiewicz, Mieszko, Wezgowiec, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37233364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14050254
_version_ 1785048960731185152
author Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna
Mikulewicz, Marcin
Wieckiewicz, Mieszko
Wezgowiec, Joanna
author_facet Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna
Mikulewicz, Marcin
Wieckiewicz, Mieszko
Wezgowiec, Joanna
author_sort Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna
collection PubMed
description Currently, 3D print is becoming more common in all branches of medicine, including dentistry. Some novel resins, such as BioMed Amber (Formlabs), are used and incorporated to more advanced techniques. The aims of the study were to check whether or not polishing and/or artificial aging influences the properties of the 3D-printed resin. A total of 240 specimens of BioMed Resin were printed. Two shapes (rectangular and dumbbell) were prepared. Of each shape, 120 specimens were divided into four groups each (with no influence, after polishing only, after artificial aging only, and after both polishing and artificial aging). Artificial aging took place in water at the temperature of 37 °C for 90 days. For testing, the universal testing machine (Z10-X700, AML Instruments, Lincoln, UK) was used. The axial compression was performed with the speed of 1mm/min. The tensile modulus was measured with the constant speed of 5 mm/min. The highest resistance to compression and tensile test were observed in the specimens that were neither polished nor aged (0.88 ± 0.03 and 2.88 ± 0.26, respectively). The lowest resistance to compression was observed in the specimens that were not polished, but aged (0.70 ± 0.02). The lowest results of the tensile test were observed when specimens were both polished and aged (2.05 ± 0.28). Both polishing and artificial aging weakened the mechanical properties of the BioMed Amber resin. The compressive modulus changed much with or without polishing. The tensile modulus differed in specimens that were either polished or aged. The application of both did not change the properties when compared to the polished or aged probes only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10219233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102192332023-05-27 The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed Amber(®) Resin’s Mechanical Properties Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna Mikulewicz, Marcin Wieckiewicz, Mieszko Wezgowiec, Joanna J Funct Biomater Article Currently, 3D print is becoming more common in all branches of medicine, including dentistry. Some novel resins, such as BioMed Amber (Formlabs), are used and incorporated to more advanced techniques. The aims of the study were to check whether or not polishing and/or artificial aging influences the properties of the 3D-printed resin. A total of 240 specimens of BioMed Resin were printed. Two shapes (rectangular and dumbbell) were prepared. Of each shape, 120 specimens were divided into four groups each (with no influence, after polishing only, after artificial aging only, and after both polishing and artificial aging). Artificial aging took place in water at the temperature of 37 °C for 90 days. For testing, the universal testing machine (Z10-X700, AML Instruments, Lincoln, UK) was used. The axial compression was performed with the speed of 1mm/min. The tensile modulus was measured with the constant speed of 5 mm/min. The highest resistance to compression and tensile test were observed in the specimens that were neither polished nor aged (0.88 ± 0.03 and 2.88 ± 0.26, respectively). The lowest resistance to compression was observed in the specimens that were not polished, but aged (0.70 ± 0.02). The lowest results of the tensile test were observed when specimens were both polished and aged (2.05 ± 0.28). Both polishing and artificial aging weakened the mechanical properties of the BioMed Amber resin. The compressive modulus changed much with or without polishing. The tensile modulus differed in specimens that were either polished or aged. The application of both did not change the properties when compared to the polished or aged probes only. MDPI 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10219233/ /pubmed/37233364 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14050254 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna
Mikulewicz, Marcin
Wieckiewicz, Mieszko
Wezgowiec, Joanna
The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed Amber(®) Resin’s Mechanical Properties
title The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed Amber(®) Resin’s Mechanical Properties
title_full The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed Amber(®) Resin’s Mechanical Properties
title_fullStr The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed Amber(®) Resin’s Mechanical Properties
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed Amber(®) Resin’s Mechanical Properties
title_short The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed Amber(®) Resin’s Mechanical Properties
title_sort influence of polishing and artificial aging on biomed amber(®) resin’s mechanical properties
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37233364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14050254
work_keys_str_mv AT paradowskastolarzanna theinfluenceofpolishingandartificialagingonbiomedamberresinsmechanicalproperties
AT mikulewiczmarcin theinfluenceofpolishingandartificialagingonbiomedamberresinsmechanicalproperties
AT wieckiewiczmieszko theinfluenceofpolishingandartificialagingonbiomedamberresinsmechanicalproperties
AT wezgowiecjoanna theinfluenceofpolishingandartificialagingonbiomedamberresinsmechanicalproperties
AT paradowskastolarzanna influenceofpolishingandartificialagingonbiomedamberresinsmechanicalproperties
AT mikulewiczmarcin influenceofpolishingandartificialagingonbiomedamberresinsmechanicalproperties
AT wieckiewiczmieszko influenceofpolishingandartificialagingonbiomedamberresinsmechanicalproperties
AT wezgowiecjoanna influenceofpolishingandartificialagingonbiomedamberresinsmechanicalproperties