Cargando…
Diagnostic Workup and Outcome in Patients with Profound Hyponatremia
Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder. A proper diagnosis is important for its successful management, especially in profound hyponatremia. The European hyponatremia guidelines point at sodium and osmolality measurement in plasma and urine, and the clinical evaluation of volume status...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103567 |
_version_ | 1785049019591950336 |
---|---|
author | Isaak, Johann Boesing, Maria Potasso, Laura Lenherr, Christoph Luethi-Corridori, Giorgia Leuppi, Joerg D. Leuppi-Taegtmeyer, Anne B. |
author_facet | Isaak, Johann Boesing, Maria Potasso, Laura Lenherr, Christoph Luethi-Corridori, Giorgia Leuppi, Joerg D. Leuppi-Taegtmeyer, Anne B. |
author_sort | Isaak, Johann |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder. A proper diagnosis is important for its successful management, especially in profound hyponatremia. The European hyponatremia guidelines point at sodium and osmolality measurement in plasma and urine, and the clinical evaluation of volume status as the minimum diagnostic workup for the diagnosis of hyponatremia. We aimed to determine compliance with guidelines and to investigate possible associations with patient outcomes. In this retrospective study, we analysed the management of 263 patients hospitalised with profound hyponatremia at a Swiss teaching hospital between October 2019 and March 2021. We compared patients with a complete minimum diagnostic workup (D-Group) to patients without (N-Group). A minimum diagnostic workup was performed in 65.5% of patients and 13.7% did not receive any treatment for hyponatremia or an underlying cause. The twelve-month survival did not show statistically significant differences between the groups (HR 1.1, 95%-CI: 0.58–2.12, p-value 0.680). The chance of receiving treatment for hyponatremia was higher in the D-group vs. N-Group (91.9% vs. 75.8%, p-value < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed significantly better survival for treated patients compared to not treated (HR 0.37, 95%-CI: 0.17–0.78, p-value 0.009). More efforts should be made to ensure treatment of profound hyponatremia in hospitalised patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10219478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102194782023-05-27 Diagnostic Workup and Outcome in Patients with Profound Hyponatremia Isaak, Johann Boesing, Maria Potasso, Laura Lenherr, Christoph Luethi-Corridori, Giorgia Leuppi, Joerg D. Leuppi-Taegtmeyer, Anne B. J Clin Med Article Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder. A proper diagnosis is important for its successful management, especially in profound hyponatremia. The European hyponatremia guidelines point at sodium and osmolality measurement in plasma and urine, and the clinical evaluation of volume status as the minimum diagnostic workup for the diagnosis of hyponatremia. We aimed to determine compliance with guidelines and to investigate possible associations with patient outcomes. In this retrospective study, we analysed the management of 263 patients hospitalised with profound hyponatremia at a Swiss teaching hospital between October 2019 and March 2021. We compared patients with a complete minimum diagnostic workup (D-Group) to patients without (N-Group). A minimum diagnostic workup was performed in 65.5% of patients and 13.7% did not receive any treatment for hyponatremia or an underlying cause. The twelve-month survival did not show statistically significant differences between the groups (HR 1.1, 95%-CI: 0.58–2.12, p-value 0.680). The chance of receiving treatment for hyponatremia was higher in the D-group vs. N-Group (91.9% vs. 75.8%, p-value < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed significantly better survival for treated patients compared to not treated (HR 0.37, 95%-CI: 0.17–0.78, p-value 0.009). More efforts should be made to ensure treatment of profound hyponatremia in hospitalised patients. MDPI 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10219478/ /pubmed/37240673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103567 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Isaak, Johann Boesing, Maria Potasso, Laura Lenherr, Christoph Luethi-Corridori, Giorgia Leuppi, Joerg D. Leuppi-Taegtmeyer, Anne B. Diagnostic Workup and Outcome in Patients with Profound Hyponatremia |
title | Diagnostic Workup and Outcome in Patients with Profound Hyponatremia |
title_full | Diagnostic Workup and Outcome in Patients with Profound Hyponatremia |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Workup and Outcome in Patients with Profound Hyponatremia |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Workup and Outcome in Patients with Profound Hyponatremia |
title_short | Diagnostic Workup and Outcome in Patients with Profound Hyponatremia |
title_sort | diagnostic workup and outcome in patients with profound hyponatremia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103567 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isaakjohann diagnosticworkupandoutcomeinpatientswithprofoundhyponatremia AT boesingmaria diagnosticworkupandoutcomeinpatientswithprofoundhyponatremia AT potassolaura diagnosticworkupandoutcomeinpatientswithprofoundhyponatremia AT lenherrchristoph diagnosticworkupandoutcomeinpatientswithprofoundhyponatremia AT luethicorridorigiorgia diagnosticworkupandoutcomeinpatientswithprofoundhyponatremia AT leuppijoergd diagnosticworkupandoutcomeinpatientswithprofoundhyponatremia AT leuppitaegtmeyeranneb diagnosticworkupandoutcomeinpatientswithprofoundhyponatremia |