Cargando…

The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Vocal fold polyps (VFP) are a common cause of voice disorders and laryngeal discomfort. They are usually treated by behavioral voice therapy (VT) or phonosurgery, or a combination (CT) of both. However, the superiority of either of these treatments has not been clearly established. Metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barsties v. Latoszek, Ben, Watts, Christopher R., Hetjens, Svetlana, Neumann, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103451
_version_ 1785049035519819776
author Barsties v. Latoszek, Ben
Watts, Christopher R.
Hetjens, Svetlana
Neumann, Katrin
author_facet Barsties v. Latoszek, Ben
Watts, Christopher R.
Hetjens, Svetlana
Neumann, Katrin
author_sort Barsties v. Latoszek, Ben
collection PubMed
description Background: Vocal fold polyps (VFP) are a common cause of voice disorders and laryngeal discomfort. They are usually treated by behavioral voice therapy (VT) or phonosurgery, or a combination (CT) of both. However, the superiority of either of these treatments has not been clearly established. Methods: Three databases were searched from inception to October 2022 and a manual search was performed. All clinical trials of VFP treatment were included that reported at least auditory–perceptual judgment, aerodynamics, acoustics, and the patient-perceived handicap. Results: We identified 31 eligible studies (VT: n = 47–194; phonosurgery: n = 404–1039; CT: n = 237–350). All treatment approaches were highly effective, with large effect sizes (d > 0.8) and significant improvements in almost all voice parameters (p-values < 0.05). Phonosurgery reduced roughness and NHR, and the emotional and functional subscales of the VHI-30 were the most compared to behavioral voice therapy and combined treatment (p-values < 0.001). Combined treatment improved hoarseness, jitter, shimmer, MPT, and the physical subscale of the VHI-30 more than phonosurgery and behavioral voice therapy (p-values < 0.001). Conclusions: All three treatment approaches were effective in eliminating vocal fold polyps or their negative sequelae, with phonosurgery and combined treatment providing the greatest improvement. These results may inform future treatment decisions for patients with vocal fold polyps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10219546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102195462023-05-27 The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Barsties v. Latoszek, Ben Watts, Christopher R. Hetjens, Svetlana Neumann, Katrin J Clin Med Article Background: Vocal fold polyps (VFP) are a common cause of voice disorders and laryngeal discomfort. They are usually treated by behavioral voice therapy (VT) or phonosurgery, or a combination (CT) of both. However, the superiority of either of these treatments has not been clearly established. Methods: Three databases were searched from inception to October 2022 and a manual search was performed. All clinical trials of VFP treatment were included that reported at least auditory–perceptual judgment, aerodynamics, acoustics, and the patient-perceived handicap. Results: We identified 31 eligible studies (VT: n = 47–194; phonosurgery: n = 404–1039; CT: n = 237–350). All treatment approaches were highly effective, with large effect sizes (d > 0.8) and significant improvements in almost all voice parameters (p-values < 0.05). Phonosurgery reduced roughness and NHR, and the emotional and functional subscales of the VHI-30 were the most compared to behavioral voice therapy and combined treatment (p-values < 0.001). Combined treatment improved hoarseness, jitter, shimmer, MPT, and the physical subscale of the VHI-30 more than phonosurgery and behavioral voice therapy (p-values < 0.001). Conclusions: All three treatment approaches were effective in eliminating vocal fold polyps or their negative sequelae, with phonosurgery and combined treatment providing the greatest improvement. These results may inform future treatment decisions for patients with vocal fold polyps. MDPI 2023-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10219546/ /pubmed/37240557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103451 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barsties v. Latoszek, Ben
Watts, Christopher R.
Hetjens, Svetlana
Neumann, Katrin
The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy of different voice treatments for vocal fold polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103451
work_keys_str_mv AT barstiesvlatoszekben theefficacyofdifferentvoicetreatmentsforvocalfoldpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wattschristopherr theefficacyofdifferentvoicetreatmentsforvocalfoldpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hetjenssvetlana theefficacyofdifferentvoicetreatmentsforvocalfoldpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT neumannkatrin theefficacyofdifferentvoicetreatmentsforvocalfoldpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT barstiesvlatoszekben efficacyofdifferentvoicetreatmentsforvocalfoldpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wattschristopherr efficacyofdifferentvoicetreatmentsforvocalfoldpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hetjenssvetlana efficacyofdifferentvoicetreatmentsforvocalfoldpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT neumannkatrin efficacyofdifferentvoicetreatmentsforvocalfoldpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis