Cargando…

COVID-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in Victoria, Australia 2020–2021

BACKGROUND: Policy responses to COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia over 2020–2021 have been supported by evidence generated through mathematical modelling. This study describes the design, key findings, and process for policy translation of a series of modelling studies conducted for the Victorian Depa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Nick, Abeysuriya, Romesh G, Delport, Dominic, Sacks-Davis, Rachel, Nolan, Jonathan, West, Daniel, Sutton, Brett, Wallace, Euan M, Hellard, Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15936-w
_version_ 1785049092872732672
author Scott, Nick
Abeysuriya, Romesh G
Delport, Dominic
Sacks-Davis, Rachel
Nolan, Jonathan
West, Daniel
Sutton, Brett
Wallace, Euan M
Hellard, Margaret
author_facet Scott, Nick
Abeysuriya, Romesh G
Delport, Dominic
Sacks-Davis, Rachel
Nolan, Jonathan
West, Daniel
Sutton, Brett
Wallace, Euan M
Hellard, Margaret
author_sort Scott, Nick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Policy responses to COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia over 2020–2021 have been supported by evidence generated through mathematical modelling. This study describes the design, key findings, and process for policy translation of a series of modelling studies conducted for the Victorian Department of Health COVID-19 response team during this period. METHODS: An agent-based model, Covasim, was used to simulate the impact of policy interventions on COVID-19 outbreaks and epidemic waves. The model was continually adapted to enable scenario analysis of settings or policies being considered at the time (e.g. elimination of community transmission versus disease control). Model scenarios were co-designed with government, to fill evidence gaps prior to key decisions. RESULTS: Understanding outbreak risk following incursions was critical to eliminating community COVID-19 transmission. Analyses showed risk depended on whether the first detected case was the index case, a primary contact of the index case, or a ‘mystery case’. There were benefits of early lockdown on first case detection and gradual easing of restrictions to minimise resurgence risk from undetected cases. As vaccination coverage increased and the focus shifted to controlling rather than eliminating community transmission, understanding health system demand was critical. Analyses showed that vaccines alone could not protect health systems and need to be complemented with other public health measures. CONCLUSIONS: Model evidence offered the greatest value when decisions needed to be made pre-emptively, or for questions that could not be answered with empiric data and data analysis alone. Co-designing scenarios with policy-makers ensured relevance and increased policy translation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15936-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10219801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102198012023-05-28 COVID-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in Victoria, Australia 2020–2021 Scott, Nick Abeysuriya, Romesh G Delport, Dominic Sacks-Davis, Rachel Nolan, Jonathan West, Daniel Sutton, Brett Wallace, Euan M Hellard, Margaret BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Policy responses to COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia over 2020–2021 have been supported by evidence generated through mathematical modelling. This study describes the design, key findings, and process for policy translation of a series of modelling studies conducted for the Victorian Department of Health COVID-19 response team during this period. METHODS: An agent-based model, Covasim, was used to simulate the impact of policy interventions on COVID-19 outbreaks and epidemic waves. The model was continually adapted to enable scenario analysis of settings or policies being considered at the time (e.g. elimination of community transmission versus disease control). Model scenarios were co-designed with government, to fill evidence gaps prior to key decisions. RESULTS: Understanding outbreak risk following incursions was critical to eliminating community COVID-19 transmission. Analyses showed risk depended on whether the first detected case was the index case, a primary contact of the index case, or a ‘mystery case’. There were benefits of early lockdown on first case detection and gradual easing of restrictions to minimise resurgence risk from undetected cases. As vaccination coverage increased and the focus shifted to controlling rather than eliminating community transmission, understanding health system demand was critical. Analyses showed that vaccines alone could not protect health systems and need to be complemented with other public health measures. CONCLUSIONS: Model evidence offered the greatest value when decisions needed to be made pre-emptively, or for questions that could not be answered with empiric data and data analysis alone. Co-designing scenarios with policy-makers ensured relevance and increased policy translation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15936-w. BioMed Central 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10219801/ /pubmed/37237343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15936-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Scott, Nick
Abeysuriya, Romesh G
Delport, Dominic
Sacks-Davis, Rachel
Nolan, Jonathan
West, Daniel
Sutton, Brett
Wallace, Euan M
Hellard, Margaret
COVID-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in Victoria, Australia 2020–2021
title COVID-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in Victoria, Australia 2020–2021
title_full COVID-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in Victoria, Australia 2020–2021
title_fullStr COVID-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in Victoria, Australia 2020–2021
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in Victoria, Australia 2020–2021
title_short COVID-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in Victoria, Australia 2020–2021
title_sort covid-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in victoria, australia 2020–2021
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15936-w
work_keys_str_mv AT scottnick covid19epidemicmodellingforpolicydecisionsupportinvictoriaaustralia20202021
AT abeysuriyaromeshg covid19epidemicmodellingforpolicydecisionsupportinvictoriaaustralia20202021
AT delportdominic covid19epidemicmodellingforpolicydecisionsupportinvictoriaaustralia20202021
AT sacksdavisrachel covid19epidemicmodellingforpolicydecisionsupportinvictoriaaustralia20202021
AT nolanjonathan covid19epidemicmodellingforpolicydecisionsupportinvictoriaaustralia20202021
AT westdaniel covid19epidemicmodellingforpolicydecisionsupportinvictoriaaustralia20202021
AT suttonbrett covid19epidemicmodellingforpolicydecisionsupportinvictoriaaustralia20202021
AT wallaceeuanm covid19epidemicmodellingforpolicydecisionsupportinvictoriaaustralia20202021
AT hellardmargaret covid19epidemicmodellingforpolicydecisionsupportinvictoriaaustralia20202021