Cargando…
Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center
BACKGROUND: Prompt endovascular care of patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a major challenge in rural regions as primary stroke centers (PSC) usually cannot provide neuro-interventional services. Objective The core content of the Flying Intervention Team (FIT)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8 |
_version_ | 1785049106534629376 |
---|---|
author | Kettner, Alexander Schlachetzki, Felix Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias Zimmer, Claus Wunderlich, Silke Kraus, Frank Haberl, Roman Ludwig Hubert, Gordian Jan Boy, Sandra Henninger, Julia Friedrich, Benjamin Maegerlein, Christian |
author_facet | Kettner, Alexander Schlachetzki, Felix Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias Zimmer, Claus Wunderlich, Silke Kraus, Frank Haberl, Roman Ludwig Hubert, Gordian Jan Boy, Sandra Henninger, Julia Friedrich, Benjamin Maegerlein, Christian |
author_sort | Kettner, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prompt endovascular care of patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a major challenge in rural regions as primary stroke centers (PSC) usually cannot provide neuro-interventional services. Objective The core content of the Flying Intervention Team (FIT) project is to perform thrombectomy on-site at a local PSC after the neuro-interventionalist has been transported via helicopter to the target hospital. An important and so far unanswered question is whether mechanical thrombectomy can be performed as safely and successfully on-site as in a specialized comprehensive stroke center (CSC). METHODS: Comparison of 100 FIT thrombectomies on site in 14 different PSCs with 128 control thrombectomies at 1 CSC (79 drip-and-ship, 49 mothership) performed by a single interventionalist with respect to technical-procedural success parameters, procedural times, and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of technical success (95.0% successful interventions in FIT group vs. 94.5% in control group, p = 0.60) and complications (3% major complications in FIT vs. 1.6% in control group, p = 0.47). Regarding time from onset to groin puncture, there was no difference between FIT and the entire control group (182 vs. 183 min, p = 0.28), but a trend in favor of FIT compared with the drip-and-ship control subgroup (182 vs. 210 min, p = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: Airborne neuro-interventional thrombectomy service is a feasible approach for rural regions. If performed by experienced neuro-interventionalists, technical success and complication rates are comparable to treatment in a specialized neuro-interventional department. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10219878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102198782023-05-28 Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center Kettner, Alexander Schlachetzki, Felix Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias Zimmer, Claus Wunderlich, Silke Kraus, Frank Haberl, Roman Ludwig Hubert, Gordian Jan Boy, Sandra Henninger, Julia Friedrich, Benjamin Maegerlein, Christian Clin Neuroradiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Prompt endovascular care of patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a major challenge in rural regions as primary stroke centers (PSC) usually cannot provide neuro-interventional services. Objective The core content of the Flying Intervention Team (FIT) project is to perform thrombectomy on-site at a local PSC after the neuro-interventionalist has been transported via helicopter to the target hospital. An important and so far unanswered question is whether mechanical thrombectomy can be performed as safely and successfully on-site as in a specialized comprehensive stroke center (CSC). METHODS: Comparison of 100 FIT thrombectomies on site in 14 different PSCs with 128 control thrombectomies at 1 CSC (79 drip-and-ship, 49 mothership) performed by a single interventionalist with respect to technical-procedural success parameters, procedural times, and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of technical success (95.0% successful interventions in FIT group vs. 94.5% in control group, p = 0.60) and complications (3% major complications in FIT vs. 1.6% in control group, p = 0.47). Regarding time from onset to groin puncture, there was no difference between FIT and the entire control group (182 vs. 183 min, p = 0.28), but a trend in favor of FIT compared with the drip-and-ship control subgroup (182 vs. 210 min, p = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: Airborne neuro-interventional thrombectomy service is a feasible approach for rural regions. If performed by experienced neuro-interventionalists, technical success and complication rates are comparable to treatment in a specialized neuro-interventional department. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10219878/ /pubmed/36322161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kettner, Alexander Schlachetzki, Felix Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias Zimmer, Claus Wunderlich, Silke Kraus, Frank Haberl, Roman Ludwig Hubert, Gordian Jan Boy, Sandra Henninger, Julia Friedrich, Benjamin Maegerlein, Christian Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center |
title | Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center |
title_full | Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center |
title_fullStr | Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center |
title_short | Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center |
title_sort | feasibility, safety, and technical success of the flying intervention team in acute ischemic stroke: comparison of interventions in different primary stroke centers with those in a comprehensive stroke center |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kettneralexander feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT schlachetzkifelix feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT boeckhbehrenstobias feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT zimmerclaus feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT wunderlichsilke feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT krausfrank feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT haberlromanludwig feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT hubertgordianjan feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT boysandra feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT henningerjulia feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT friedrichbenjamin feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter AT maegerleinchristian feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter |