Cargando…

Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center

BACKGROUND: Prompt endovascular care of patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a major challenge in rural regions as primary stroke centers (PSC) usually cannot provide neuro-interventional services. Objective The core content of the Flying Intervention Team (FIT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kettner, Alexander, Schlachetzki, Felix, Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias, Zimmer, Claus, Wunderlich, Silke, Kraus, Frank, Haberl, Roman Ludwig, Hubert, Gordian Jan, Boy, Sandra, Henninger, Julia, Friedrich, Benjamin, Maegerlein, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8
_version_ 1785049106534629376
author Kettner, Alexander
Schlachetzki, Felix
Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias
Zimmer, Claus
Wunderlich, Silke
Kraus, Frank
Haberl, Roman Ludwig
Hubert, Gordian Jan
Boy, Sandra
Henninger, Julia
Friedrich, Benjamin
Maegerlein, Christian
author_facet Kettner, Alexander
Schlachetzki, Felix
Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias
Zimmer, Claus
Wunderlich, Silke
Kraus, Frank
Haberl, Roman Ludwig
Hubert, Gordian Jan
Boy, Sandra
Henninger, Julia
Friedrich, Benjamin
Maegerlein, Christian
author_sort Kettner, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prompt endovascular care of patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a major challenge in rural regions as primary stroke centers (PSC) usually cannot provide neuro-interventional services. Objective The core content of the Flying Intervention Team (FIT) project is to perform thrombectomy on-site at a local PSC after the neuro-interventionalist has been transported via helicopter to the target hospital. An important and so far unanswered question is whether mechanical thrombectomy can be performed as safely and successfully on-site as in a specialized comprehensive stroke center (CSC). METHODS: Comparison of 100 FIT thrombectomies on site in 14 different PSCs with 128 control thrombectomies at 1 CSC (79 drip-and-ship, 49 mothership) performed by a single interventionalist with respect to technical-procedural success parameters, procedural times, and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of technical success (95.0% successful interventions in FIT group vs. 94.5% in control group, p = 0.60) and complications (3% major complications in FIT vs. 1.6% in control group, p = 0.47). Regarding time from onset to groin puncture, there was no difference between FIT and the entire control group (182 vs. 183 min, p = 0.28), but a trend in favor of FIT compared with the drip-and-ship control subgroup (182 vs. 210 min, p = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: Airborne neuro-interventional thrombectomy service is a feasible approach for rural regions. If performed by experienced neuro-interventionalists, technical success and complication rates are comparable to treatment in a specialized neuro-interventional department. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10219878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102198782023-05-28 Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center Kettner, Alexander Schlachetzki, Felix Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias Zimmer, Claus Wunderlich, Silke Kraus, Frank Haberl, Roman Ludwig Hubert, Gordian Jan Boy, Sandra Henninger, Julia Friedrich, Benjamin Maegerlein, Christian Clin Neuroradiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Prompt endovascular care of patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a major challenge in rural regions as primary stroke centers (PSC) usually cannot provide neuro-interventional services. Objective The core content of the Flying Intervention Team (FIT) project is to perform thrombectomy on-site at a local PSC after the neuro-interventionalist has been transported via helicopter to the target hospital. An important and so far unanswered question is whether mechanical thrombectomy can be performed as safely and successfully on-site as in a specialized comprehensive stroke center (CSC). METHODS: Comparison of 100 FIT thrombectomies on site in 14 different PSCs with 128 control thrombectomies at 1 CSC (79 drip-and-ship, 49 mothership) performed by a single interventionalist with respect to technical-procedural success parameters, procedural times, and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of technical success (95.0% successful interventions in FIT group vs. 94.5% in control group, p = 0.60) and complications (3% major complications in FIT vs. 1.6% in control group, p = 0.47). Regarding time from onset to groin puncture, there was no difference between FIT and the entire control group (182 vs. 183 min, p = 0.28), but a trend in favor of FIT compared with the drip-and-ship control subgroup (182 vs. 210 min, p = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: Airborne neuro-interventional thrombectomy service is a feasible approach for rural regions. If performed by experienced neuro-interventionalists, technical success and complication rates are comparable to treatment in a specialized neuro-interventional department. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10219878/ /pubmed/36322161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kettner, Alexander
Schlachetzki, Felix
Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias
Zimmer, Claus
Wunderlich, Silke
Kraus, Frank
Haberl, Roman Ludwig
Hubert, Gordian Jan
Boy, Sandra
Henninger, Julia
Friedrich, Benjamin
Maegerlein, Christian
Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center
title Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center
title_full Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center
title_fullStr Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center
title_short Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center
title_sort feasibility, safety, and technical success of the flying intervention team in acute ischemic stroke: comparison of interventions in different primary stroke centers with those in a comprehensive stroke center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kettneralexander feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT schlachetzkifelix feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT boeckhbehrenstobias feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT zimmerclaus feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT wunderlichsilke feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT krausfrank feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT haberlromanludwig feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT hubertgordianjan feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT boysandra feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT henningerjulia feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT friedrichbenjamin feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter
AT maegerleinchristian feasibilitysafetyandtechnicalsuccessoftheflyinginterventionteaminacuteischemicstrokecomparisonofinterventionsindifferentprimarystrokecenterswiththoseinacomprehensivestrokecenter