Cargando…

Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior

Smart agricultural (SA) technology has become a technological support for modern agriculture. By exploring the decision-making process and psychological motivation of farmers in adopting SA technology, it is conducive to achieving the popularisation of SA technology and promoting the modernisation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jingjin, Liu, Guoyong, Chen, Yulan, Li, Rongyao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35091-x
_version_ 1785049129386246144
author Li, Jingjin
Liu, Guoyong
Chen, Yulan
Li, Rongyao
author_facet Li, Jingjin
Liu, Guoyong
Chen, Yulan
Li, Rongyao
author_sort Li, Jingjin
collection PubMed
description Smart agricultural (SA) technology has become a technological support for modern agriculture. By exploring the decision-making process and psychological motivation of farmers in adopting SA technology, it is conducive to achieving the popularisation of SA technology and promoting the modernisation of agriculture. Based on microscopic research data, a Structural Equation Model (SEM) is used to analyse the influencing factors and extent of cotton farmers’ adoption of SA technologies, using Deconstructive Theory of Planned Behavior (DTPB) as the analytical framework. This was combined with in-depth interviews to further reveal the motivations and influencing mechanisms of cotton farmers’ adoption of SA technologies. The results show that under the behavioural belief dimension, cotton farmers value the positive effect of perceived usefulness even though the risk of the technology itself has a dampening effect on adoption intentions. Under the normative belief dimension, superior influence influenced the willingness to adopt SA technologies to a greater extent than peer influence. Under the control belief dimension, factors such as self-efficacy and information channels influence willingness to adopt technology and behaviour. In addition, behavioural attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control all contribute to cotton farmers’ willingness to adopt SA technologies, and can also influence behaviour directly or indirectly through willingness to adopt. Policy and technology satisfaction positively moderate the transition from willingness to behaviour. Therefore, preferential policies are proposed to reduce the cost of adopting SA technologies; to continuously improve the level of SA technologies; to establish SA technology test plots to provide a reference base; and to increase knowledge training on SA and expand access to information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102200132023-05-28 Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior Li, Jingjin Liu, Guoyong Chen, Yulan Li, Rongyao Sci Rep Article Smart agricultural (SA) technology has become a technological support for modern agriculture. By exploring the decision-making process and psychological motivation of farmers in adopting SA technology, it is conducive to achieving the popularisation of SA technology and promoting the modernisation of agriculture. Based on microscopic research data, a Structural Equation Model (SEM) is used to analyse the influencing factors and extent of cotton farmers’ adoption of SA technologies, using Deconstructive Theory of Planned Behavior (DTPB) as the analytical framework. This was combined with in-depth interviews to further reveal the motivations and influencing mechanisms of cotton farmers’ adoption of SA technologies. The results show that under the behavioural belief dimension, cotton farmers value the positive effect of perceived usefulness even though the risk of the technology itself has a dampening effect on adoption intentions. Under the normative belief dimension, superior influence influenced the willingness to adopt SA technologies to a greater extent than peer influence. Under the control belief dimension, factors such as self-efficacy and information channels influence willingness to adopt technology and behaviour. In addition, behavioural attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control all contribute to cotton farmers’ willingness to adopt SA technologies, and can also influence behaviour directly or indirectly through willingness to adopt. Policy and technology satisfaction positively moderate the transition from willingness to behaviour. Therefore, preferential policies are proposed to reduce the cost of adopting SA technologies; to continuously improve the level of SA technologies; to establish SA technology test plots to provide a reference base; and to increase knowledge training on SA and expand access to information. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10220013/ /pubmed/37237071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35091-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Li, Jingjin
Liu, Guoyong
Chen, Yulan
Li, Rongyao
Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior
title Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior
title_full Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior
title_fullStr Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior
title_full_unstemmed Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior
title_short Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior
title_sort study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35091-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lijingjin studyontheinfluencemechanismofadoptionofsmartagriculturetechnologybehavior
AT liuguoyong studyontheinfluencemechanismofadoptionofsmartagriculturetechnologybehavior
AT chenyulan studyontheinfluencemechanismofadoptionofsmartagriculturetechnologybehavior
AT lirongyao studyontheinfluencemechanismofadoptionofsmartagriculturetechnologybehavior