Cargando…
Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening
PURPOSE: Inter-aural insertion depth difference (IEDD) in bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) with continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing is known to reduce the recognition of speech in noise and spatial release from masking (SRM). However, the independent channel selection in the ‘n-of-m’ s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07845-w |
_version_ | 1785049149645783040 |
---|---|
author | Fathima, Hasna Bhat, Jayashree S. Pitchaimuthu, Arivudai Nambi |
author_facet | Fathima, Hasna Bhat, Jayashree S. Pitchaimuthu, Arivudai Nambi |
author_sort | Fathima, Hasna |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Inter-aural insertion depth difference (IEDD) in bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) with continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing is known to reduce the recognition of speech in noise and spatial release from masking (SRM). However, the independent channel selection in the ‘n-of-m’ sound coding strategy might have a different effect on speech recognition and SRM when compared to the effects of IEDD in CIS-based findings. This study aimed to investigate the effect of bilateral ‘n-of-m’ processing strategy and interaural electrode insertion depth difference on speech recognition in noise and SRM under conditions that simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening. METHODS: Five young adults with normal hearing sensitivity participated in the study. The target sentences were spatially filtered to originate from 0° and the masker was spatially filtered at 0°, 15°, 37.5°, and 90° using the Oldenburg head-related transfer function database for behind the ear microphone. A 22-channel sine wave vocoder processing based on ‘n-of-m’ processing was applied to the spatialized target-masker mixture, in each ear. The perceptual experiment involved a test of speech recognition in noise under one co-located condition (target and masker at 0°) and three spatially separated conditions (target at 0°, masker at 15°, 37.5°, or 90° to the right ear). RESULTS: The results were analyzed using a three-way repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA). The effect of interaural insertion depth difference (F (2,8) = 3.145, p = 0.098, ɳ(2) = 0.007) and spatial separation between target and masker (F (3,12) = 1.239, p = 0.339, ɳ(2) = 0.004) on speech recognition in noise was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition in noise and SRM were not affected by IEDD ≤ 3 mm. Bilateral ‘n-of-m’ processing resulted in reduced speech recognition in noise and SRM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10220123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102201232023-05-28 Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening Fathima, Hasna Bhat, Jayashree S. Pitchaimuthu, Arivudai Nambi Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Inter-aural insertion depth difference (IEDD) in bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) with continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing is known to reduce the recognition of speech in noise and spatial release from masking (SRM). However, the independent channel selection in the ‘n-of-m’ sound coding strategy might have a different effect on speech recognition and SRM when compared to the effects of IEDD in CIS-based findings. This study aimed to investigate the effect of bilateral ‘n-of-m’ processing strategy and interaural electrode insertion depth difference on speech recognition in noise and SRM under conditions that simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening. METHODS: Five young adults with normal hearing sensitivity participated in the study. The target sentences were spatially filtered to originate from 0° and the masker was spatially filtered at 0°, 15°, 37.5°, and 90° using the Oldenburg head-related transfer function database for behind the ear microphone. A 22-channel sine wave vocoder processing based on ‘n-of-m’ processing was applied to the spatialized target-masker mixture, in each ear. The perceptual experiment involved a test of speech recognition in noise under one co-located condition (target and masker at 0°) and three spatially separated conditions (target at 0°, masker at 15°, 37.5°, or 90° to the right ear). RESULTS: The results were analyzed using a three-way repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA). The effect of interaural insertion depth difference (F (2,8) = 3.145, p = 0.098, ɳ(2) = 0.007) and spatial separation between target and masker (F (3,12) = 1.239, p = 0.339, ɳ(2) = 0.004) on speech recognition in noise was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition in noise and SRM were not affected by IEDD ≤ 3 mm. Bilateral ‘n-of-m’ processing resulted in reduced speech recognition in noise and SRM. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10220123/ /pubmed/36695909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07845-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Otology Fathima, Hasna Bhat, Jayashree S. Pitchaimuthu, Arivudai Nambi Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening |
title | Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening |
title_full | Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening |
title_fullStr | Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening |
title_short | Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening |
title_sort | effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening |
topic | Otology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07845-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fathimahasna effectofinterauralelectrodeinsertiondepthdifferenceandindependentbandselectiononsentencerecognitioninnoiseandspatialreleasefrommaskinginsimulatedbilateralcochlearimplantlistening AT bhatjayashrees effectofinterauralelectrodeinsertiondepthdifferenceandindependentbandselectiononsentencerecognitioninnoiseandspatialreleasefrommaskinginsimulatedbilateralcochlearimplantlistening AT pitchaimuthuarivudainambi effectofinterauralelectrodeinsertiondepthdifferenceandindependentbandselectiononsentencerecognitioninnoiseandspatialreleasefrommaskinginsimulatedbilateralcochlearimplantlistening |