Cargando…

A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparative study of ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone in peribulbar blocks

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bupivacaine and lidocaine mixtures are the commonly used local anesthetic drugs for the peribulbar blocks. Because of its safe anesthetic profile, ropivacaine is being investigated as an alternative agent. Several centers have evaluated the effect of the addition of an adjuvant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moolagani, Ramanareddy Venkata, Prathi, Sunita, Bandaru, Sriushaswini, Arepalli, Narasimha Rao, Neethipudi, Bhaskara Rao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250257
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_185_21
_version_ 1785049163427217408
author Moolagani, Ramanareddy Venkata
Prathi, Sunita
Bandaru, Sriushaswini
Arepalli, Narasimha Rao
Neethipudi, Bhaskara Rao
author_facet Moolagani, Ramanareddy Venkata
Prathi, Sunita
Bandaru, Sriushaswini
Arepalli, Narasimha Rao
Neethipudi, Bhaskara Rao
author_sort Moolagani, Ramanareddy Venkata
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bupivacaine and lidocaine mixtures are the commonly used local anesthetic drugs for the peribulbar blocks. Because of its safe anesthetic profile, ropivacaine is being investigated as an alternative agent. Several centers have evaluated the effect of the addition of an adjuvant like dexmedetomidine (DMT) to ropivacaine in enhancing the block characteristics. We proposed to evaluate the effect of the addition of DMT to ropivacaine versus a control group not having DMT as adjuvant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized comparative study was conducted on a total of 80 patients attending our hospital for cataract surgeries. Patients were allocated into four groups of 20 each (n = 20) and peribulbar blocks were given 6 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine in group R and 6 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine plus 10 μg, 15 μg, and 20 μg DMT, respectively, in groups RD1, RD2, and RD3. RESULTS: When DMT was used as an adjunct to ropivacaine, there was a prolongation of the duration of the sensory block. CONCLUSION: In peribulbar blocks, 6 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% produces satisfactory block characteristics, and the addition of 10 μg, 15 μg, or 20 μg of DMT as an adjuvant to ropivacaine 0.75% had the effect of significantly prolonging the duration of the sensory block, which is directly proportional to the dose of DMT employed. However, 20 μg of DMT added as an adjuvant to ropivacaine 0.75% appears to be the optimal dose, as this anesthetic drug mixture provides maximum prolongation of the sensory block besides providing satisfactory operating conditions, acceptable sedation levels, and stable hemodynamic parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102201822023-05-28 A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparative study of ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone in peribulbar blocks Moolagani, Ramanareddy Venkata Prathi, Sunita Bandaru, Sriushaswini Arepalli, Narasimha Rao Neethipudi, Bhaskara Rao J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bupivacaine and lidocaine mixtures are the commonly used local anesthetic drugs for the peribulbar blocks. Because of its safe anesthetic profile, ropivacaine is being investigated as an alternative agent. Several centers have evaluated the effect of the addition of an adjuvant like dexmedetomidine (DMT) to ropivacaine in enhancing the block characteristics. We proposed to evaluate the effect of the addition of DMT to ropivacaine versus a control group not having DMT as adjuvant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized comparative study was conducted on a total of 80 patients attending our hospital for cataract surgeries. Patients were allocated into four groups of 20 each (n = 20) and peribulbar blocks were given 6 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine in group R and 6 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine plus 10 μg, 15 μg, and 20 μg DMT, respectively, in groups RD1, RD2, and RD3. RESULTS: When DMT was used as an adjunct to ropivacaine, there was a prolongation of the duration of the sensory block. CONCLUSION: In peribulbar blocks, 6 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% produces satisfactory block characteristics, and the addition of 10 μg, 15 μg, or 20 μg of DMT as an adjuvant to ropivacaine 0.75% had the effect of significantly prolonging the duration of the sensory block, which is directly proportional to the dose of DMT employed. However, 20 μg of DMT added as an adjuvant to ropivacaine 0.75% appears to be the optimal dose, as this anesthetic drug mixture provides maximum prolongation of the sensory block besides providing satisfactory operating conditions, acceptable sedation levels, and stable hemodynamic parameters. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10220182/ /pubmed/37250257 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_185_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moolagani, Ramanareddy Venkata
Prathi, Sunita
Bandaru, Sriushaswini
Arepalli, Narasimha Rao
Neethipudi, Bhaskara Rao
A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparative study of ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone in peribulbar blocks
title A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparative study of ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone in peribulbar blocks
title_full A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparative study of ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone in peribulbar blocks
title_fullStr A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparative study of ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone in peribulbar blocks
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparative study of ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone in peribulbar blocks
title_short A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparative study of ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone in peribulbar blocks
title_sort prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparative study of ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone in peribulbar blocks
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250257
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_185_21
work_keys_str_mv AT moolaganiramanareddyvenkata aprospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks
AT prathisunita aprospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks
AT bandarusriushaswini aprospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks
AT arepallinarasimharao aprospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks
AT neethipudibhaskararao aprospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks
AT moolaganiramanareddyvenkata prospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks
AT prathisunita prospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks
AT bandarusriushaswini prospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks
AT arepallinarasimharao prospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks
AT neethipudibhaskararao prospectiverandomizedtripleblindcomparativestudyofropivacainedexmedetomidineversusropivacainealoneinperibulbarblocks