Cargando…

Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum tumor M2‐pyruvate kinase (TuM2‐PK), neuron‐specific enolase (NSE), and progastrin‐releasing peptide (ProGRP) levels in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: The levels of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Li, Zhang, Qian, Wang, Yuchao, Xu, Chunhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37088873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24865
_version_ 1785049188026810368
author Li, Li
Zhang, Qian
Wang, Yuchao
Xu, Chunhua
author_facet Li, Li
Zhang, Qian
Wang, Yuchao
Xu, Chunhua
author_sort Li, Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum tumor M2‐pyruvate kinase (TuM2‐PK), neuron‐specific enolase (NSE), and progastrin‐releasing peptide (ProGRP) levels in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: The levels of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in 102 patients with SCLC, 60 patients with benign lung disease (BLD), and 90 healthy controls were detected. RESULTS: The serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP levels in the SCLC group were higher than those in BLD group (p < 0.05) and healthy control group (p < 0.05). The sensitivity of TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP detection in SCLC was 82.35%, 60.78%, and 77.45% respectively, and specificity was 91.11%, 81.11%, and 86.67%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of SCLC resulting from TuM2‐PK was significantly better than that of NSE and ProGRP. The application of TuM2‐PK combined with NSE and ProGRP improved the diagnostic yield of SCLC patients and had better diagnostic value than TuM2‐PK alone. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that an elevated TuM2‐PK level was an independent prognostic factor for shorter survival in SCLC. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that TuM2‐PK levels in the serum could be an effective biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of SCLC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102202962023-05-28 Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in small cell lung cancer Li, Li Zhang, Qian Wang, Yuchao Xu, Chunhua J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum tumor M2‐pyruvate kinase (TuM2‐PK), neuron‐specific enolase (NSE), and progastrin‐releasing peptide (ProGRP) levels in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: The levels of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in 102 patients with SCLC, 60 patients with benign lung disease (BLD), and 90 healthy controls were detected. RESULTS: The serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP levels in the SCLC group were higher than those in BLD group (p < 0.05) and healthy control group (p < 0.05). The sensitivity of TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP detection in SCLC was 82.35%, 60.78%, and 77.45% respectively, and specificity was 91.11%, 81.11%, and 86.67%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of SCLC resulting from TuM2‐PK was significantly better than that of NSE and ProGRP. The application of TuM2‐PK combined with NSE and ProGRP improved the diagnostic yield of SCLC patients and had better diagnostic value than TuM2‐PK alone. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that an elevated TuM2‐PK level was an independent prognostic factor for shorter survival in SCLC. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that TuM2‐PK levels in the serum could be an effective biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of SCLC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10220296/ /pubmed/37088873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24865 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Li, Li
Zhang, Qian
Wang, Yuchao
Xu, Chunhua
Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in small cell lung cancer
title Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in small cell lung cancer
title_full Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in small cell lung cancer
title_short Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum TuM2‐PK, NSE, and ProGRP in small cell lung cancer
title_sort evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum tum2‐pk, nse, and progrp in small cell lung cancer
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37088873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24865
work_keys_str_mv AT lili evaluatingthediagnosticandprognosticvalueofserumtum2pknseandprogrpinsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangqian evaluatingthediagnosticandprognosticvalueofserumtum2pknseandprogrpinsmallcelllungcancer
AT wangyuchao evaluatingthediagnosticandprognosticvalueofserumtum2pknseandprogrpinsmallcelllungcancer
AT xuchunhua evaluatingthediagnosticandprognosticvalueofserumtum2pknseandprogrpinsmallcelllungcancer