Cargando…

Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock

AIM: This study aimed to investigate the association of early vasopressor initiation with improved septic shock outcomes. METHODS: This multicenter observational study was conducted in 17 intensive care units in Japan and included adult patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit from J...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abe, Toshikazu, Umemura, Yutaka, Ogura, Hiroshi, Kushimoto, Shigeki, Fujishima, Seitaro, Saitoh, Daizoh, Gando, Satoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.852
_version_ 1785049222672809984
author Abe, Toshikazu
Umemura, Yutaka
Ogura, Hiroshi
Kushimoto, Shigeki
Fujishima, Seitaro
Saitoh, Daizoh
Gando, Satoshi
author_facet Abe, Toshikazu
Umemura, Yutaka
Ogura, Hiroshi
Kushimoto, Shigeki
Fujishima, Seitaro
Saitoh, Daizoh
Gando, Satoshi
author_sort Abe, Toshikazu
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aimed to investigate the association of early vasopressor initiation with improved septic shock outcomes. METHODS: This multicenter observational study was conducted in 17 intensive care units in Japan and included adult patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit from July 2019 to August 2020 and treated with vasopressor therapy. Patients were divided into the early vasopressor group (≤1 h from sepsis recognition) and the delayed vasopressor group (>1 h). The impact of early vasopressor administration on risk‐adjusted in‐hospital mortality was estimated using logistic regression analyses adjusted by an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis with propensity scoring. RESULTS: Among the 97 patients, 67 received vasopressor therapy within 1 h from sepsis recognition and 30 received vasopressor after 1 h. In‐hospital mortality was 32.8% in the early vasopressor group and 26.7% in the delayed vasopressor group (p = 0.543). The adjusted odds ratio for in‐hospital mortality was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.17–3.29) when comparing patients in the early vasopressor with those in the delayed vasopressor group. The fit curve from the mixed‐effects model showed a relatively lower trend toward an infusion volume over time in the early vasopressor group than in the delayed vasopressor group. CONCLUSION: Our study did not reach a definitive conclusion for early vasopressor administration. However, early vasopressor administration may help avoid volume overload in the long course of sepsis care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102204532023-05-28 Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock Abe, Toshikazu Umemura, Yutaka Ogura, Hiroshi Kushimoto, Shigeki Fujishima, Seitaro Saitoh, Daizoh Gando, Satoshi Acute Med Surg Brief Communication AIM: This study aimed to investigate the association of early vasopressor initiation with improved septic shock outcomes. METHODS: This multicenter observational study was conducted in 17 intensive care units in Japan and included adult patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit from July 2019 to August 2020 and treated with vasopressor therapy. Patients were divided into the early vasopressor group (≤1 h from sepsis recognition) and the delayed vasopressor group (>1 h). The impact of early vasopressor administration on risk‐adjusted in‐hospital mortality was estimated using logistic regression analyses adjusted by an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis with propensity scoring. RESULTS: Among the 97 patients, 67 received vasopressor therapy within 1 h from sepsis recognition and 30 received vasopressor after 1 h. In‐hospital mortality was 32.8% in the early vasopressor group and 26.7% in the delayed vasopressor group (p = 0.543). The adjusted odds ratio for in‐hospital mortality was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.17–3.29) when comparing patients in the early vasopressor with those in the delayed vasopressor group. The fit curve from the mixed‐effects model showed a relatively lower trend toward an infusion volume over time in the early vasopressor group than in the delayed vasopressor group. CONCLUSION: Our study did not reach a definitive conclusion for early vasopressor administration. However, early vasopressor administration may help avoid volume overload in the long course of sepsis care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10220453/ /pubmed/37250932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.852 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acute Medicine & Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Abe, Toshikazu
Umemura, Yutaka
Ogura, Hiroshi
Kushimoto, Shigeki
Fujishima, Seitaro
Saitoh, Daizoh
Gando, Satoshi
Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock
title Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock
title_full Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock
title_fullStr Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock
title_full_unstemmed Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock
title_short Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock
title_sort early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.852
work_keys_str_mv AT abetoshikazu earlyversusdelayedvasopressoradministrationinpatientswithsepticshock
AT umemurayutaka earlyversusdelayedvasopressoradministrationinpatientswithsepticshock
AT ogurahiroshi earlyversusdelayedvasopressoradministrationinpatientswithsepticshock
AT kushimotoshigeki earlyversusdelayedvasopressoradministrationinpatientswithsepticshock
AT fujishimaseitaro earlyversusdelayedvasopressoradministrationinpatientswithsepticshock
AT saitohdaizoh earlyversusdelayedvasopressoradministrationinpatientswithsepticshock
AT gandosatoshi earlyversusdelayedvasopressoradministrationinpatientswithsepticshock