Cargando…

Temporal, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables Derived from a Wearable 3D Inertial Sensor to Estimate Muscle Power during the 5 Sit to Stand Test in Older Individuals: A Validation Study

The 5-Sit-to-stand test (5STS) is widely used to estimate lower limb muscle power (MP). An Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) could be used to obtain objective, accurate and automatic measures of lower limb MP. In 62 older adults (30 F, 66 ± 6 years) we compared (paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bochicchio, Gianluca, Ferrari, Luca, Bottari, Alberto, Lucertini, Francesco, Scarton, Alessandra, Pogliaghi, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37430715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23104802
_version_ 1785049240062394368
author Bochicchio, Gianluca
Ferrari, Luca
Bottari, Alberto
Lucertini, Francesco
Scarton, Alessandra
Pogliaghi, Silvia
author_facet Bochicchio, Gianluca
Ferrari, Luca
Bottari, Alberto
Lucertini, Francesco
Scarton, Alessandra
Pogliaghi, Silvia
author_sort Bochicchio, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description The 5-Sit-to-stand test (5STS) is widely used to estimate lower limb muscle power (MP). An Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) could be used to obtain objective, accurate and automatic measures of lower limb MP. In 62 older adults (30 F, 66 ± 6 years) we compared (paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis) IMU-based estimates of total trial time (totT), mean concentric time (McT), velocity (McV), force (McF), and MP against laboratory equipment (Lab). While significantly different, Lab vs. IMU measures of totT (8.97 ± 2.44 vs. 8.86 ± 2.45 s, p = 0.003), McV (0.35 ± 0.09 vs. 0.27 ± 0.10 m∙s(−1), p < 0.001), McF (673.13 ± 146.43 vs. 653.41 ± 144.58 N, p < 0.001) and MP (233.00 ± 70.83 vs. 174.84 ± 71.16 W, p < 0.001) had a very large to extremely large correlation (r = 0.99, r = 0.93, and r = 0.97 r = 0.76 and r = 0.79, respectively, for totT, McT, McF, McV and MP). Bland–Altman analysis showed a small, significant bias and good precision for all the variables, but McT. A sensor-based 5STS evaluation appears to be a promising objective and digitalized measure of MP. This approach could offer a practical alternative to the gold standard methods used to measure MP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102205312023-05-28 Temporal, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables Derived from a Wearable 3D Inertial Sensor to Estimate Muscle Power during the 5 Sit to Stand Test in Older Individuals: A Validation Study Bochicchio, Gianluca Ferrari, Luca Bottari, Alberto Lucertini, Francesco Scarton, Alessandra Pogliaghi, Silvia Sensors (Basel) Article The 5-Sit-to-stand test (5STS) is widely used to estimate lower limb muscle power (MP). An Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) could be used to obtain objective, accurate and automatic measures of lower limb MP. In 62 older adults (30 F, 66 ± 6 years) we compared (paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis) IMU-based estimates of total trial time (totT), mean concentric time (McT), velocity (McV), force (McF), and MP against laboratory equipment (Lab). While significantly different, Lab vs. IMU measures of totT (8.97 ± 2.44 vs. 8.86 ± 2.45 s, p = 0.003), McV (0.35 ± 0.09 vs. 0.27 ± 0.10 m∙s(−1), p < 0.001), McF (673.13 ± 146.43 vs. 653.41 ± 144.58 N, p < 0.001) and MP (233.00 ± 70.83 vs. 174.84 ± 71.16 W, p < 0.001) had a very large to extremely large correlation (r = 0.99, r = 0.93, and r = 0.97 r = 0.76 and r = 0.79, respectively, for totT, McT, McF, McV and MP). Bland–Altman analysis showed a small, significant bias and good precision for all the variables, but McT. A sensor-based 5STS evaluation appears to be a promising objective and digitalized measure of MP. This approach could offer a practical alternative to the gold standard methods used to measure MP. MDPI 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10220531/ /pubmed/37430715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23104802 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bochicchio, Gianluca
Ferrari, Luca
Bottari, Alberto
Lucertini, Francesco
Scarton, Alessandra
Pogliaghi, Silvia
Temporal, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables Derived from a Wearable 3D Inertial Sensor to Estimate Muscle Power during the 5 Sit to Stand Test in Older Individuals: A Validation Study
title Temporal, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables Derived from a Wearable 3D Inertial Sensor to Estimate Muscle Power during the 5 Sit to Stand Test in Older Individuals: A Validation Study
title_full Temporal, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables Derived from a Wearable 3D Inertial Sensor to Estimate Muscle Power during the 5 Sit to Stand Test in Older Individuals: A Validation Study
title_fullStr Temporal, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables Derived from a Wearable 3D Inertial Sensor to Estimate Muscle Power during the 5 Sit to Stand Test in Older Individuals: A Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed Temporal, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables Derived from a Wearable 3D Inertial Sensor to Estimate Muscle Power during the 5 Sit to Stand Test in Older Individuals: A Validation Study
title_short Temporal, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables Derived from a Wearable 3D Inertial Sensor to Estimate Muscle Power during the 5 Sit to Stand Test in Older Individuals: A Validation Study
title_sort temporal, kinematic and kinetic variables derived from a wearable 3d inertial sensor to estimate muscle power during the 5 sit to stand test in older individuals: a validation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37430715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23104802
work_keys_str_mv AT bochicchiogianluca temporalkinematicandkineticvariablesderivedfromawearable3dinertialsensortoestimatemusclepowerduringthe5sittostandtestinolderindividualsavalidationstudy
AT ferrariluca temporalkinematicandkineticvariablesderivedfromawearable3dinertialsensortoestimatemusclepowerduringthe5sittostandtestinolderindividualsavalidationstudy
AT bottarialberto temporalkinematicandkineticvariablesderivedfromawearable3dinertialsensortoestimatemusclepowerduringthe5sittostandtestinolderindividualsavalidationstudy
AT lucertinifrancesco temporalkinematicandkineticvariablesderivedfromawearable3dinertialsensortoestimatemusclepowerduringthe5sittostandtestinolderindividualsavalidationstudy
AT scartonalessandra temporalkinematicandkineticvariablesderivedfromawearable3dinertialsensortoestimatemusclepowerduringthe5sittostandtestinolderindividualsavalidationstudy
AT pogliaghisilvia temporalkinematicandkineticvariablesderivedfromawearable3dinertialsensortoestimatemusclepowerduringthe5sittostandtestinolderindividualsavalidationstudy