Cargando…

An Anisotropic Velocity Model for Microseismic Events Localization in Tunnels

The velocity model is one of the main factors affecting the accuracy of microseismic event localization. This paper addresses the issue of the low accuracy of microseismic event localization in tunnels and, combined with active-source technology, proposes a “source–station” velocity model. The veloc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Tong, Wang, Songren, Jiang, Xuan, Peng, Guili, Tuo, Xianguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37430584
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23104670
_version_ 1785049240771231744
author Shen, Tong
Wang, Songren
Jiang, Xuan
Peng, Guili
Tuo, Xianguo
author_facet Shen, Tong
Wang, Songren
Jiang, Xuan
Peng, Guili
Tuo, Xianguo
author_sort Shen, Tong
collection PubMed
description The velocity model is one of the main factors affecting the accuracy of microseismic event localization. This paper addresses the issue of the low accuracy of microseismic event localization in tunnels and, combined with active-source technology, proposes a “source–station” velocity model. The velocity model assumes that the velocity from the source to each station is different, and it can greatly improve the accuracy of the time-difference-of-arrival algorithm. At the same time, for the case of multiple active sources, the MLKNN algorithm was selected as the velocity model selection method through comparative testing. The results of numerical simulation and laboratory tests in the tunnel showed that the average location accuracy of the “source–station” velocity model was improved compared with that of the isotropic velocity and sectional velocity models, with numerical simulation experiments improving accuracy by 79.82% and 57.05% (from 13.28 m and 6.24 m to 2.68 m), and laboratory tests in the tunnel improving accuracy by 89.26% and 76.33% (from 6.61 m and 3.00 m to 0.71 m). The results of the experiments showed that the method proposed in this paper can effectively improve the location accuracy of microseismic events in tunnels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102205342023-05-28 An Anisotropic Velocity Model for Microseismic Events Localization in Tunnels Shen, Tong Wang, Songren Jiang, Xuan Peng, Guili Tuo, Xianguo Sensors (Basel) Article The velocity model is one of the main factors affecting the accuracy of microseismic event localization. This paper addresses the issue of the low accuracy of microseismic event localization in tunnels and, combined with active-source technology, proposes a “source–station” velocity model. The velocity model assumes that the velocity from the source to each station is different, and it can greatly improve the accuracy of the time-difference-of-arrival algorithm. At the same time, for the case of multiple active sources, the MLKNN algorithm was selected as the velocity model selection method through comparative testing. The results of numerical simulation and laboratory tests in the tunnel showed that the average location accuracy of the “source–station” velocity model was improved compared with that of the isotropic velocity and sectional velocity models, with numerical simulation experiments improving accuracy by 79.82% and 57.05% (from 13.28 m and 6.24 m to 2.68 m), and laboratory tests in the tunnel improving accuracy by 89.26% and 76.33% (from 6.61 m and 3.00 m to 0.71 m). The results of the experiments showed that the method proposed in this paper can effectively improve the location accuracy of microseismic events in tunnels. MDPI 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10220534/ /pubmed/37430584 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23104670 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shen, Tong
Wang, Songren
Jiang, Xuan
Peng, Guili
Tuo, Xianguo
An Anisotropic Velocity Model for Microseismic Events Localization in Tunnels
title An Anisotropic Velocity Model for Microseismic Events Localization in Tunnels
title_full An Anisotropic Velocity Model for Microseismic Events Localization in Tunnels
title_fullStr An Anisotropic Velocity Model for Microseismic Events Localization in Tunnels
title_full_unstemmed An Anisotropic Velocity Model for Microseismic Events Localization in Tunnels
title_short An Anisotropic Velocity Model for Microseismic Events Localization in Tunnels
title_sort anisotropic velocity model for microseismic events localization in tunnels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37430584
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23104670
work_keys_str_mv AT shentong ananisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels
AT wangsongren ananisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels
AT jiangxuan ananisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels
AT pengguili ananisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels
AT tuoxianguo ananisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels
AT shentong anisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels
AT wangsongren anisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels
AT jiangxuan anisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels
AT pengguili anisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels
AT tuoxianguo anisotropicvelocitymodelformicroseismiceventslocalizationintunnels