Cargando…

Cook with Different Pots, but Similar Taste? Comparison of Phase Angle Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis According to Device Type and Examination Posture

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is gaining popularity as a tool for body composition assessment. Although BIA has been studied and validated in different populations, age groups, and clinical settings, including critically ill patients, there are concerns about BIA reproducibility and reliabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Jihyun, Kim, Jeehyun, Chun, Byung-chul, Lee, Jae-myeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13051119
_version_ 1785049263282061312
author Yang, Jihyun
Kim, Jeehyun
Chun, Byung-chul
Lee, Jae-myeong
author_facet Yang, Jihyun
Kim, Jeehyun
Chun, Byung-chul
Lee, Jae-myeong
author_sort Yang, Jihyun
collection PubMed
description Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is gaining popularity as a tool for body composition assessment. Although BIA has been studied and validated in different populations, age groups, and clinical settings, including critically ill patients, there are concerns about BIA reproducibility and reliability for different device types and postures. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of BIA using different devices, postures, and lead types. Cross-sectional observational data were collected from 74 healthy volunteers (32 women, 42 men). We used two types of devices, three types of postures (standing, sitting, and lying), and two lead types (clamp lead and adhesive lead) to measure the whole-body phase angle (phA) at a single frequency of 50 kHz. The measurements were validated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot analysis. All phA measurements recorded using the two types of devices, three different postures, and two types of leads were equivalent (mean ICC = 0.9932, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9905–0.0053, p < 0.001). The average mean difference in phA was 0.31 (95% CI 0.16–0.46). The largest phA value was measured using BWA with an adhesive-type lead in the supine position. There were no differences between the standing and sitting positions. We compared the consistency and reliability of phA using two devices, two lead types, and three postures. Seven different phA were interchangeable in healthy volunteers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102206282023-05-28 Cook with Different Pots, but Similar Taste? Comparison of Phase Angle Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis According to Device Type and Examination Posture Yang, Jihyun Kim, Jeehyun Chun, Byung-chul Lee, Jae-myeong Life (Basel) Communication Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is gaining popularity as a tool for body composition assessment. Although BIA has been studied and validated in different populations, age groups, and clinical settings, including critically ill patients, there are concerns about BIA reproducibility and reliability for different device types and postures. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of BIA using different devices, postures, and lead types. Cross-sectional observational data were collected from 74 healthy volunteers (32 women, 42 men). We used two types of devices, three types of postures (standing, sitting, and lying), and two lead types (clamp lead and adhesive lead) to measure the whole-body phase angle (phA) at a single frequency of 50 kHz. The measurements were validated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot analysis. All phA measurements recorded using the two types of devices, three different postures, and two types of leads were equivalent (mean ICC = 0.9932, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9905–0.0053, p < 0.001). The average mean difference in phA was 0.31 (95% CI 0.16–0.46). The largest phA value was measured using BWA with an adhesive-type lead in the supine position. There were no differences between the standing and sitting positions. We compared the consistency and reliability of phA using two devices, two lead types, and three postures. Seven different phA were interchangeable in healthy volunteers. MDPI 2023-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10220628/ /pubmed/37240764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13051119 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Yang, Jihyun
Kim, Jeehyun
Chun, Byung-chul
Lee, Jae-myeong
Cook with Different Pots, but Similar Taste? Comparison of Phase Angle Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis According to Device Type and Examination Posture
title Cook with Different Pots, but Similar Taste? Comparison of Phase Angle Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis According to Device Type and Examination Posture
title_full Cook with Different Pots, but Similar Taste? Comparison of Phase Angle Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis According to Device Type and Examination Posture
title_fullStr Cook with Different Pots, but Similar Taste? Comparison of Phase Angle Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis According to Device Type and Examination Posture
title_full_unstemmed Cook with Different Pots, but Similar Taste? Comparison of Phase Angle Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis According to Device Type and Examination Posture
title_short Cook with Different Pots, but Similar Taste? Comparison of Phase Angle Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis According to Device Type and Examination Posture
title_sort cook with different pots, but similar taste? comparison of phase angle using bioelectrical impedance analysis according to device type and examination posture
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13051119
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjihyun cookwithdifferentpotsbutsimilartastecomparisonofphaseangleusingbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisaccordingtodevicetypeandexaminationposture
AT kimjeehyun cookwithdifferentpotsbutsimilartastecomparisonofphaseangleusingbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisaccordingtodevicetypeandexaminationposture
AT chunbyungchul cookwithdifferentpotsbutsimilartastecomparisonofphaseangleusingbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisaccordingtodevicetypeandexaminationposture
AT leejaemyeong cookwithdifferentpotsbutsimilartastecomparisonofphaseangleusingbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisaccordingtodevicetypeandexaminationposture