Cargando…
False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?
This review summarizes the status of resolving the problem of false positive serologic results (FPSR) in Brucella serology, compiles our knowledge on the molecular background of the problem, and highlights some prospects for its resolution. The molecular basis of the FPSRs is reviewed through analyz...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8050274 |
_version_ | 1785049280632848384 |
---|---|
author | Bányász, Borbála Antal, József Dénes, Béla |
author_facet | Bányász, Borbála Antal, József Dénes, Béla |
author_sort | Bányász, Borbála |
collection | PubMed |
description | This review summarizes the status of resolving the problem of false positive serologic results (FPSR) in Brucella serology, compiles our knowledge on the molecular background of the problem, and highlights some prospects for its resolution. The molecular basis of the FPSRs is reviewed through analyzing the components of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria, especially the surface lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with details related to brucellae. After evaluating the efforts that have been made to solve target specificity problems of serologic tests, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) resolving the FPSR problem requires a deeper understanding than we currently possess, both of Brucella immunology and of the current serology tests; (ii) the practical solutions will be as expensive as the related research; and (iii) the root cause of FPSRs is the application of the same type of antigen (S-type LPS) in the currently approved tests. Thus, new approaches are necessary to resolve the problems stemming from FPSR. Such approaches suggested by this paper are: (i) the application of antigens from R-type bacteria; or (ii) the further development of specific brucellin-based skin tests; or (iii) the application of microbial cell-free DNA as analyte, whose approach is detailed in this paper. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10220701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102207012023-05-28 False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond? Bányász, Borbála Antal, József Dénes, Béla Trop Med Infect Dis Review This review summarizes the status of resolving the problem of false positive serologic results (FPSR) in Brucella serology, compiles our knowledge on the molecular background of the problem, and highlights some prospects for its resolution. The molecular basis of the FPSRs is reviewed through analyzing the components of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria, especially the surface lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with details related to brucellae. After evaluating the efforts that have been made to solve target specificity problems of serologic tests, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) resolving the FPSR problem requires a deeper understanding than we currently possess, both of Brucella immunology and of the current serology tests; (ii) the practical solutions will be as expensive as the related research; and (iii) the root cause of FPSRs is the application of the same type of antigen (S-type LPS) in the currently approved tests. Thus, new approaches are necessary to resolve the problems stemming from FPSR. Such approaches suggested by this paper are: (i) the application of antigens from R-type bacteria; or (ii) the further development of specific brucellin-based skin tests; or (iii) the application of microbial cell-free DNA as analyte, whose approach is detailed in this paper. MDPI 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10220701/ /pubmed/37235322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8050274 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Bányász, Borbála Antal, József Dénes, Béla False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond? |
title | False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond? |
title_full | False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond? |
title_fullStr | False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond? |
title_full_unstemmed | False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond? |
title_short | False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond? |
title_sort | false positives in brucellosis serology: wrong bait and wrong pond? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8050274 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banyaszborbala falsepositivesinbrucellosisserologywrongbaitandwrongpond AT antaljozsef falsepositivesinbrucellosisserologywrongbaitandwrongpond AT denesbela falsepositivesinbrucellosisserologywrongbaitandwrongpond |