Cargando…

False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?

This review summarizes the status of resolving the problem of false positive serologic results (FPSR) in Brucella serology, compiles our knowledge on the molecular background of the problem, and highlights some prospects for its resolution. The molecular basis of the FPSRs is reviewed through analyz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bányász, Borbála, Antal, József, Dénes, Béla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8050274
_version_ 1785049280632848384
author Bányász, Borbála
Antal, József
Dénes, Béla
author_facet Bányász, Borbála
Antal, József
Dénes, Béla
author_sort Bányász, Borbála
collection PubMed
description This review summarizes the status of resolving the problem of false positive serologic results (FPSR) in Brucella serology, compiles our knowledge on the molecular background of the problem, and highlights some prospects for its resolution. The molecular basis of the FPSRs is reviewed through analyzing the components of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria, especially the surface lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with details related to brucellae. After evaluating the efforts that have been made to solve target specificity problems of serologic tests, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) resolving the FPSR problem requires a deeper understanding than we currently possess, both of Brucella immunology and of the current serology tests; (ii) the practical solutions will be as expensive as the related research; and (iii) the root cause of FPSRs is the application of the same type of antigen (S-type LPS) in the currently approved tests. Thus, new approaches are necessary to resolve the problems stemming from FPSR. Such approaches suggested by this paper are: (i) the application of antigens from R-type bacteria; or (ii) the further development of specific brucellin-based skin tests; or (iii) the application of microbial cell-free DNA as analyte, whose approach is detailed in this paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102207012023-05-28 False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond? Bányász, Borbála Antal, József Dénes, Béla Trop Med Infect Dis Review This review summarizes the status of resolving the problem of false positive serologic results (FPSR) in Brucella serology, compiles our knowledge on the molecular background of the problem, and highlights some prospects for its resolution. The molecular basis of the FPSRs is reviewed through analyzing the components of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria, especially the surface lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with details related to brucellae. After evaluating the efforts that have been made to solve target specificity problems of serologic tests, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) resolving the FPSR problem requires a deeper understanding than we currently possess, both of Brucella immunology and of the current serology tests; (ii) the practical solutions will be as expensive as the related research; and (iii) the root cause of FPSRs is the application of the same type of antigen (S-type LPS) in the currently approved tests. Thus, new approaches are necessary to resolve the problems stemming from FPSR. Such approaches suggested by this paper are: (i) the application of antigens from R-type bacteria; or (ii) the further development of specific brucellin-based skin tests; or (iii) the application of microbial cell-free DNA as analyte, whose approach is detailed in this paper. MDPI 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10220701/ /pubmed/37235322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8050274 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bányász, Borbála
Antal, József
Dénes, Béla
False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?
title False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?
title_full False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?
title_fullStr False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?
title_full_unstemmed False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?
title_short False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?
title_sort false positives in brucellosis serology: wrong bait and wrong pond?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8050274
work_keys_str_mv AT banyaszborbala falsepositivesinbrucellosisserologywrongbaitandwrongpond
AT antaljozsef falsepositivesinbrucellosisserologywrongbaitandwrongpond
AT denesbela falsepositivesinbrucellosisserologywrongbaitandwrongpond