Cargando…

Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study explored the perceptions of veterinarians and clients regarding risk factors and potential solutions for medical disputes in veterinary practices. A total of 245 respondents in Taiwan, including 125 veterinarians and 120 clients, completed an electronic questionnaire in 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zih-Fang, Hsu, Yi-Hsin Elsa, Lee, Jih-Jong, Chou, Chung-Hsi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10050367
_version_ 1785049287157088256
author Chen, Zih-Fang
Hsu, Yi-Hsin Elsa
Lee, Jih-Jong
Chou, Chung-Hsi
author_facet Chen, Zih-Fang
Hsu, Yi-Hsin Elsa
Lee, Jih-Jong
Chou, Chung-Hsi
author_sort Chen, Zih-Fang
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study explored the perceptions of veterinarians and clients regarding risk factors and potential solutions for medical disputes in veterinary practices. A total of 245 respondents in Taiwan, including 125 veterinarians and 120 clients, completed an electronic questionnaire in 2022. The questionnaire covered six dimensions: medical skills, complaint management, the attitudes of stakeholders during interactions, medical expenses, clients’ perspectives, and communication modes. The results showed significant differences in the perceptions of inducing medical dispute risk factors between clients and veterinarians in veterinary practice. Both young veterinarians and clients perceived medical skills as the highest risk factor for inducing medical disputes, while experienced veterinarians disagreed. Veterinarians with medical dispute experience identified stakeholders’ attitudes during interactions as the top contributing factor. The possible solutions for veterinarians included providing clients with cost estimates and fostering empathy and compassion for clients. In contrast, clients emphasized being informed consent of treatment and expenses. They suggested that their veterinarians should provide detailed written information. The study emphasizes the importance of understanding stakeholders’ perceptions to reduce medical disputes and highlights the need for enhanced communication by young veterinarians. The findings provide valuable insights for veterinarians and clients into preventing and managing medical disputes in veterinary practices. ABSTRACT: Medical disputes in veterinary practices are widespread; yet, a limited amount of research has been conducted to investigate the factors contributing to medical disputes. This study examined veterinarians’ and clients’ perceptions regarding risk factors and possible solutions to medical disputes. A total of 245 respondents from Taiwan, including 125 veterinarians and 120 clients, completed an electronic self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire in 2022. The questionnaire covered six dimensions: medical skills, complaint management, the attitudes of stakeholders during interactions, medical expenses, clients’ perspectives, and communication modes. The results highlighted significant differences in the perceptions of risk factors for inducing medical disputes and possible solutions between clients and veterinarians in veterinary practice. First, young veterinarians and clients perceived medical skills as the highest risk factor for inducing medical disputes, while experienced veterinarians disagreed (p < 0.001). In addition, veterinarians with medical dispute experience identified stakeholders’ attitudes during interactions as the top contributing factor. Second, regarding possible solutions, all veterinarians preferred offering clients cost estimates and cultivating empathy and compassion towards them. On the other hand, clients underscored the importance of obtaining informed consent for treatments and expenses and suggested that veterinarians should supply comprehensive written information to facilitate this process. This study underlies the importance of understanding stakeholders’ perceptions to mitigate medical disputes and advocates for improved communication education and training for young veterinarians. These findings provide valuable insights for veterinarians and clients, contributing to preventing and managing medical disputes in veterinary practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102207292023-05-28 Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients Chen, Zih-Fang Hsu, Yi-Hsin Elsa Lee, Jih-Jong Chou, Chung-Hsi Vet Sci Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study explored the perceptions of veterinarians and clients regarding risk factors and potential solutions for medical disputes in veterinary practices. A total of 245 respondents in Taiwan, including 125 veterinarians and 120 clients, completed an electronic questionnaire in 2022. The questionnaire covered six dimensions: medical skills, complaint management, the attitudes of stakeholders during interactions, medical expenses, clients’ perspectives, and communication modes. The results showed significant differences in the perceptions of inducing medical dispute risk factors between clients and veterinarians in veterinary practice. Both young veterinarians and clients perceived medical skills as the highest risk factor for inducing medical disputes, while experienced veterinarians disagreed. Veterinarians with medical dispute experience identified stakeholders’ attitudes during interactions as the top contributing factor. The possible solutions for veterinarians included providing clients with cost estimates and fostering empathy and compassion for clients. In contrast, clients emphasized being informed consent of treatment and expenses. They suggested that their veterinarians should provide detailed written information. The study emphasizes the importance of understanding stakeholders’ perceptions to reduce medical disputes and highlights the need for enhanced communication by young veterinarians. The findings provide valuable insights for veterinarians and clients into preventing and managing medical disputes in veterinary practices. ABSTRACT: Medical disputes in veterinary practices are widespread; yet, a limited amount of research has been conducted to investigate the factors contributing to medical disputes. This study examined veterinarians’ and clients’ perceptions regarding risk factors and possible solutions to medical disputes. A total of 245 respondents from Taiwan, including 125 veterinarians and 120 clients, completed an electronic self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire in 2022. The questionnaire covered six dimensions: medical skills, complaint management, the attitudes of stakeholders during interactions, medical expenses, clients’ perspectives, and communication modes. The results highlighted significant differences in the perceptions of risk factors for inducing medical disputes and possible solutions between clients and veterinarians in veterinary practice. First, young veterinarians and clients perceived medical skills as the highest risk factor for inducing medical disputes, while experienced veterinarians disagreed (p < 0.001). In addition, veterinarians with medical dispute experience identified stakeholders’ attitudes during interactions as the top contributing factor. Second, regarding possible solutions, all veterinarians preferred offering clients cost estimates and cultivating empathy and compassion towards them. On the other hand, clients underscored the importance of obtaining informed consent for treatments and expenses and suggested that veterinarians should supply comprehensive written information to facilitate this process. This study underlies the importance of understanding stakeholders’ perceptions to mitigate medical disputes and advocates for improved communication education and training for young veterinarians. These findings provide valuable insights for veterinarians and clients, contributing to preventing and managing medical disputes in veterinary practices. MDPI 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10220729/ /pubmed/37235450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10050367 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Zih-Fang
Hsu, Yi-Hsin Elsa
Lee, Jih-Jong
Chou, Chung-Hsi
Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients
title Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients
title_full Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients
title_fullStr Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients
title_full_unstemmed Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients
title_short Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients
title_sort are they thinking differently? the perceptions and differences in medical disputes between veterinarians and clients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10050367
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzihfang aretheythinkingdifferentlytheperceptionsanddifferencesinmedicaldisputesbetweenveterinariansandclients
AT hsuyihsinelsa aretheythinkingdifferentlytheperceptionsanddifferencesinmedicaldisputesbetweenveterinariansandclients
AT leejihjong aretheythinkingdifferentlytheperceptionsanddifferencesinmedicaldisputesbetweenveterinariansandclients
AT chouchunghsi aretheythinkingdifferentlytheperceptionsanddifferencesinmedicaldisputesbetweenveterinariansandclients