Cargando…
Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment
Prostate cancer (PCa) surgery has a strong impact on men’s social and sexual lives. For this reason, many patients ask for robotic surgery. To assess the rate of lost patients due to the lack of a robotic platform (RPl) at our center, we retrospectively selected 577 patients who underwent prostate b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050794 |
_version_ | 1785049288101855232 |
---|---|
author | Esperto, Francesco Cacciatore, Loris Tedesco, Francesco Testa, Antonio Callè, Pasquale Ragusa, Alberto Deanesi, Noemi Minore, Antonio Prata, Francesco Brassetti, Aldo Papalia, Rocco Scarpa, Roberto Mario |
author_facet | Esperto, Francesco Cacciatore, Loris Tedesco, Francesco Testa, Antonio Callè, Pasquale Ragusa, Alberto Deanesi, Noemi Minore, Antonio Prata, Francesco Brassetti, Aldo Papalia, Rocco Scarpa, Roberto Mario |
author_sort | Esperto, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prostate cancer (PCa) surgery has a strong impact on men’s social and sexual lives. For this reason, many patients ask for robotic surgery. To assess the rate of lost patients due to the lack of a robotic platform (RPl) at our center, we retrospectively selected 577 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2020 and 2021 who were eligible for radical prostatectomy (RP) (ISUP ≥ 2; age ≤ 70 yr). Patients eligible for surgery who decided to be operated received a phone call interview asking the reason for their choice. Overall, 230 patients (31.7%) underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical prostatectomy (LaRP) at our center, while 494 patients (68.3%) were not treated in our hospital. Finally, 347 patients were included: 87 patients (25.1%) underwent radiotherapy; 59 patients (17%) were already under another urologist’s care; 113 patients (32.5%) underwent robotic surgery elsewhere; and 88 patients (25.4%) followed the suggestion of friends or relatives based on their surgical experience. Despite no surgical technique for RP having shown superiority in terms of oncological or functional outcomes, patients eligible for PCa treatment decided to be operated on elsewhere because of the lack of an RPl. Our results show how the presence of an RPl may increase the case volume of RP by 49% at our center. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10220733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102207332023-05-28 Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment Esperto, Francesco Cacciatore, Loris Tedesco, Francesco Testa, Antonio Callè, Pasquale Ragusa, Alberto Deanesi, Noemi Minore, Antonio Prata, Francesco Brassetti, Aldo Papalia, Rocco Scarpa, Roberto Mario J Pers Med Article Prostate cancer (PCa) surgery has a strong impact on men’s social and sexual lives. For this reason, many patients ask for robotic surgery. To assess the rate of lost patients due to the lack of a robotic platform (RPl) at our center, we retrospectively selected 577 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2020 and 2021 who were eligible for radical prostatectomy (RP) (ISUP ≥ 2; age ≤ 70 yr). Patients eligible for surgery who decided to be operated received a phone call interview asking the reason for their choice. Overall, 230 patients (31.7%) underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical prostatectomy (LaRP) at our center, while 494 patients (68.3%) were not treated in our hospital. Finally, 347 patients were included: 87 patients (25.1%) underwent radiotherapy; 59 patients (17%) were already under another urologist’s care; 113 patients (32.5%) underwent robotic surgery elsewhere; and 88 patients (25.4%) followed the suggestion of friends or relatives based on their surgical experience. Despite no surgical technique for RP having shown superiority in terms of oncological or functional outcomes, patients eligible for PCa treatment decided to be operated on elsewhere because of the lack of an RPl. Our results show how the presence of an RPl may increase the case volume of RP by 49% at our center. MDPI 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10220733/ /pubmed/37240964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050794 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Esperto, Francesco Cacciatore, Loris Tedesco, Francesco Testa, Antonio Callè, Pasquale Ragusa, Alberto Deanesi, Noemi Minore, Antonio Prata, Francesco Brassetti, Aldo Papalia, Rocco Scarpa, Roberto Mario Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment |
title | Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment |
title_full | Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment |
title_fullStr | Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment |
title_short | Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment |
title_sort | impact of robotic technologies on prostate cancer patients’ choice for radical treatment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT espertofrancesco impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT cacciatoreloris impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT tedescofrancesco impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT testaantonio impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT callepasquale impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT ragusaalberto impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT deanesinoemi impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT minoreantonio impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT pratafrancesco impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT brassettialdo impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT papaliarocco impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment AT scarparobertomario impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment |