Cargando…

Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment

Prostate cancer (PCa) surgery has a strong impact on men’s social and sexual lives. For this reason, many patients ask for robotic surgery. To assess the rate of lost patients due to the lack of a robotic platform (RPl) at our center, we retrospectively selected 577 patients who underwent prostate b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esperto, Francesco, Cacciatore, Loris, Tedesco, Francesco, Testa, Antonio, Callè, Pasquale, Ragusa, Alberto, Deanesi, Noemi, Minore, Antonio, Prata, Francesco, Brassetti, Aldo, Papalia, Rocco, Scarpa, Roberto Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050794
_version_ 1785049288101855232
author Esperto, Francesco
Cacciatore, Loris
Tedesco, Francesco
Testa, Antonio
Callè, Pasquale
Ragusa, Alberto
Deanesi, Noemi
Minore, Antonio
Prata, Francesco
Brassetti, Aldo
Papalia, Rocco
Scarpa, Roberto Mario
author_facet Esperto, Francesco
Cacciatore, Loris
Tedesco, Francesco
Testa, Antonio
Callè, Pasquale
Ragusa, Alberto
Deanesi, Noemi
Minore, Antonio
Prata, Francesco
Brassetti, Aldo
Papalia, Rocco
Scarpa, Roberto Mario
author_sort Esperto, Francesco
collection PubMed
description Prostate cancer (PCa) surgery has a strong impact on men’s social and sexual lives. For this reason, many patients ask for robotic surgery. To assess the rate of lost patients due to the lack of a robotic platform (RPl) at our center, we retrospectively selected 577 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2020 and 2021 who were eligible for radical prostatectomy (RP) (ISUP ≥ 2; age ≤ 70 yr). Patients eligible for surgery who decided to be operated received a phone call interview asking the reason for their choice. Overall, 230 patients (31.7%) underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical prostatectomy (LaRP) at our center, while 494 patients (68.3%) were not treated in our hospital. Finally, 347 patients were included: 87 patients (25.1%) underwent radiotherapy; 59 patients (17%) were already under another urologist’s care; 113 patients (32.5%) underwent robotic surgery elsewhere; and 88 patients (25.4%) followed the suggestion of friends or relatives based on their surgical experience. Despite no surgical technique for RP having shown superiority in terms of oncological or functional outcomes, patients eligible for PCa treatment decided to be operated on elsewhere because of the lack of an RPl. Our results show how the presence of an RPl may increase the case volume of RP by 49% at our center.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102207332023-05-28 Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment Esperto, Francesco Cacciatore, Loris Tedesco, Francesco Testa, Antonio Callè, Pasquale Ragusa, Alberto Deanesi, Noemi Minore, Antonio Prata, Francesco Brassetti, Aldo Papalia, Rocco Scarpa, Roberto Mario J Pers Med Article Prostate cancer (PCa) surgery has a strong impact on men’s social and sexual lives. For this reason, many patients ask for robotic surgery. To assess the rate of lost patients due to the lack of a robotic platform (RPl) at our center, we retrospectively selected 577 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2020 and 2021 who were eligible for radical prostatectomy (RP) (ISUP ≥ 2; age ≤ 70 yr). Patients eligible for surgery who decided to be operated received a phone call interview asking the reason for their choice. Overall, 230 patients (31.7%) underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical prostatectomy (LaRP) at our center, while 494 patients (68.3%) were not treated in our hospital. Finally, 347 patients were included: 87 patients (25.1%) underwent radiotherapy; 59 patients (17%) were already under another urologist’s care; 113 patients (32.5%) underwent robotic surgery elsewhere; and 88 patients (25.4%) followed the suggestion of friends or relatives based on their surgical experience. Despite no surgical technique for RP having shown superiority in terms of oncological or functional outcomes, patients eligible for PCa treatment decided to be operated on elsewhere because of the lack of an RPl. Our results show how the presence of an RPl may increase the case volume of RP by 49% at our center. MDPI 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10220733/ /pubmed/37240964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050794 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Esperto, Francesco
Cacciatore, Loris
Tedesco, Francesco
Testa, Antonio
Callè, Pasquale
Ragusa, Alberto
Deanesi, Noemi
Minore, Antonio
Prata, Francesco
Brassetti, Aldo
Papalia, Rocco
Scarpa, Roberto Mario
Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment
title Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment
title_full Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment
title_fullStr Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment
title_short Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment
title_sort impact of robotic technologies on prostate cancer patients’ choice for radical treatment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050794
work_keys_str_mv AT espertofrancesco impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT cacciatoreloris impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT tedescofrancesco impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT testaantonio impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT callepasquale impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT ragusaalberto impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT deanesinoemi impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT minoreantonio impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT pratafrancesco impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT brassettialdo impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT papaliarocco impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment
AT scarparobertomario impactofrobotictechnologiesonprostatecancerpatientschoiceforradicaltreatment