Cargando…

Structural Modeling of Nanobodies: A Benchmark of State-of-the-Art Artificial Intelligence Programs

The number of applications for nanobodies is steadily expanding, positioning these molecules as fast-growing biologic products in the biotechnology market. Several of their applications require protein engineering, which in turn would greatly benefit from having a reliable structural model of the na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valdés-Tresanco, Mario S., Valdés-Tresanco, Mario E., Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Daiver E., Moreno, Ernesto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28103991
_version_ 1785049329925357568
author Valdés-Tresanco, Mario S.
Valdés-Tresanco, Mario E.
Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Daiver E.
Moreno, Ernesto
author_facet Valdés-Tresanco, Mario S.
Valdés-Tresanco, Mario E.
Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Daiver E.
Moreno, Ernesto
author_sort Valdés-Tresanco, Mario S.
collection PubMed
description The number of applications for nanobodies is steadily expanding, positioning these molecules as fast-growing biologic products in the biotechnology market. Several of their applications require protein engineering, which in turn would greatly benefit from having a reliable structural model of the nanobody of interest. However, as with antibodies, the structural modeling of nanobodies is still a challenge. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), several methods have been developed in recent years that attempt to solve the problem of protein modeling. In this study, we have compared the performance in nanobody modeling of several state-of-the-art AI-based programs, either designed for general protein modeling, such as AlphaFold2, OmegaFold, ESMFold, and Yang-Server, or specifically designed for antibody modeling, such as IgFold, and Nanonet. While all these programs performed rather well in constructing the nanobody framework and CDRs 1 and 2, modeling CDR3 still represents a big challenge. Interestingly, tailoring an AI method for antibody modeling does not necessarily translate into better results for nanobodies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102209082023-05-28 Structural Modeling of Nanobodies: A Benchmark of State-of-the-Art Artificial Intelligence Programs Valdés-Tresanco, Mario S. Valdés-Tresanco, Mario E. Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Daiver E. Moreno, Ernesto Molecules Article The number of applications for nanobodies is steadily expanding, positioning these molecules as fast-growing biologic products in the biotechnology market. Several of their applications require protein engineering, which in turn would greatly benefit from having a reliable structural model of the nanobody of interest. However, as with antibodies, the structural modeling of nanobodies is still a challenge. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), several methods have been developed in recent years that attempt to solve the problem of protein modeling. In this study, we have compared the performance in nanobody modeling of several state-of-the-art AI-based programs, either designed for general protein modeling, such as AlphaFold2, OmegaFold, ESMFold, and Yang-Server, or specifically designed for antibody modeling, such as IgFold, and Nanonet. While all these programs performed rather well in constructing the nanobody framework and CDRs 1 and 2, modeling CDR3 still represents a big challenge. Interestingly, tailoring an AI method for antibody modeling does not necessarily translate into better results for nanobodies. MDPI 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10220908/ /pubmed/37241731 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28103991 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Valdés-Tresanco, Mario S.
Valdés-Tresanco, Mario E.
Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Daiver E.
Moreno, Ernesto
Structural Modeling of Nanobodies: A Benchmark of State-of-the-Art Artificial Intelligence Programs
title Structural Modeling of Nanobodies: A Benchmark of State-of-the-Art Artificial Intelligence Programs
title_full Structural Modeling of Nanobodies: A Benchmark of State-of-the-Art Artificial Intelligence Programs
title_fullStr Structural Modeling of Nanobodies: A Benchmark of State-of-the-Art Artificial Intelligence Programs
title_full_unstemmed Structural Modeling of Nanobodies: A Benchmark of State-of-the-Art Artificial Intelligence Programs
title_short Structural Modeling of Nanobodies: A Benchmark of State-of-the-Art Artificial Intelligence Programs
title_sort structural modeling of nanobodies: a benchmark of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence programs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28103991
work_keys_str_mv AT valdestresancomarios structuralmodelingofnanobodiesabenchmarkofstateoftheartartificialintelligenceprograms
AT valdestresancomarioe structuralmodelingofnanobodiesabenchmarkofstateoftheartartificialintelligenceprograms
AT jimenezgutierrezdaivere structuralmodelingofnanobodiesabenchmarkofstateoftheartartificialintelligenceprograms
AT morenoernesto structuralmodelingofnanobodiesabenchmarkofstateoftheartartificialintelligenceprograms