Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams

Specifications are available to quantify flexural performance of steel-fiber reinforced concrete beams with several parameters. Each specification provides different results. This study comparatively evaluates existing flexural beam test standards that are used to evaluate the flexural toughness of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun, Hyun-Do, Choi, Ki-Bong, Choi, Won-Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16103789
_version_ 1785049371240300544
author Yun, Hyun-Do
Choi, Ki-Bong
Choi, Won-Chang
author_facet Yun, Hyun-Do
Choi, Ki-Bong
Choi, Won-Chang
author_sort Yun, Hyun-Do
collection PubMed
description Specifications are available to quantify flexural performance of steel-fiber reinforced concrete beams with several parameters. Each specification provides different results. This study comparatively evaluates existing flexural beam test standards that are used to evaluate the flexural toughness of SFRC beam specimens. Two standards, EN-14651 and ASTM C1609, were followed to test SFRC beams under the three-point bending test (3PBT) and the four-point bending test (4PBT), respectively. Both normal tensile strength steel fiber (1200 MPa) and high tensile strength steel fiber (1500 MPa) in high-strength concrete were considered in this study. The reference parameters recommended in the two standards, which include equivalent flexural strength, residual strength, energy absorption capacity, and flexural toughness, were compared based on the tensile strength (normal or high) of the steel fiber in high-strength concrete. The 3PBT and 4PBT results indicate that both standard test methods yield similar results to quantify the flexural performance of SFRC specimens. However, unintended failure modes were observed for both standard test methods. The adopted correlation model shows that the flexural performance of SFRC is similar for 3PBTs and 4PBTs, but the residual strength obtained from the 3PBTs tends to be greater than that obtained from 4PBTs with an increase in the tensile strength of steel fiber.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10221082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102210822023-05-28 Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams Yun, Hyun-Do Choi, Ki-Bong Choi, Won-Chang Materials (Basel) Article Specifications are available to quantify flexural performance of steel-fiber reinforced concrete beams with several parameters. Each specification provides different results. This study comparatively evaluates existing flexural beam test standards that are used to evaluate the flexural toughness of SFRC beam specimens. Two standards, EN-14651 and ASTM C1609, were followed to test SFRC beams under the three-point bending test (3PBT) and the four-point bending test (4PBT), respectively. Both normal tensile strength steel fiber (1200 MPa) and high tensile strength steel fiber (1500 MPa) in high-strength concrete were considered in this study. The reference parameters recommended in the two standards, which include equivalent flexural strength, residual strength, energy absorption capacity, and flexural toughness, were compared based on the tensile strength (normal or high) of the steel fiber in high-strength concrete. The 3PBT and 4PBT results indicate that both standard test methods yield similar results to quantify the flexural performance of SFRC specimens. However, unintended failure modes were observed for both standard test methods. The adopted correlation model shows that the flexural performance of SFRC is similar for 3PBTs and 4PBTs, but the residual strength obtained from the 3PBTs tends to be greater than that obtained from 4PBTs with an increase in the tensile strength of steel fiber. MDPI 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10221082/ /pubmed/37241416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16103789 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yun, Hyun-Do
Choi, Ki-Bong
Choi, Won-Chang
Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams
title Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams
title_sort comparative evaluation of flexural toughness of steel fiber-reinforced concrete beams
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16103789
work_keys_str_mv AT yunhyundo comparativeevaluationofflexuraltoughnessofsteelfiberreinforcedconcretebeams
AT choikibong comparativeevaluationofflexuraltoughnessofsteelfiberreinforcedconcretebeams
AT choiwonchang comparativeevaluationofflexuraltoughnessofsteelfiberreinforcedconcretebeams