Cargando…

Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review

Breast-Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare low-incidence type of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, arising in the capsule around breast implants, and predominantly associated with the use of macro-textured breast implants. The purpose of this study was to use an evidenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hecker, Andrzej, Giese, Barbara, Pignet, Anna-Lisa, Schellnegger, Marlies, Kamolz, Lars-Peter, Lumenta, David Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240986
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050816
_version_ 1785049447063879680
author Hecker, Andrzej
Giese, Barbara
Pignet, Anna-Lisa
Schellnegger, Marlies
Kamolz, Lars-Peter
Lumenta, David Benjamin
author_facet Hecker, Andrzej
Giese, Barbara
Pignet, Anna-Lisa
Schellnegger, Marlies
Kamolz, Lars-Peter
Lumenta, David Benjamin
author_sort Hecker, Andrzej
collection PubMed
description Breast-Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare low-incidence type of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, arising in the capsule around breast implants, and predominantly associated with the use of macro-textured breast implants. The purpose of this study was to use an evidence-based approach to systematically identify clinical studies comparing smooth and textured breast implants in women with regard to the risk of developing BIA-ALCL. Methods: A literature search in PubMed in April 2023 and the article reference list of the French National Agency of Medicine and Health Products decision from 2019 were screened for applicable studies. Only clinical studies where the Jones surface classification could be applied (required information: breast implant manufacturer) for comparison of smooth and textured breast implants were considered. Results: From a total of 224 studies, no articles were included due to the lack of fit to the strict inclusion criteria. Conclusions: Based on the scanned and included literature, implant surface types in relation to the incidence of BIA-ALCL were not evaluated in clinical studies and data from evidence-based clinical sources plays a minor to no role in this context. An international database that combines breast implant-related data from (national, opt-out) medical device registries is, therefore, the best available option to obtain relevant long-term breast implant surveillance data on BIA-ALCL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10221400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102214002023-05-28 Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review Hecker, Andrzej Giese, Barbara Pignet, Anna-Lisa Schellnegger, Marlies Kamolz, Lars-Peter Lumenta, David Benjamin J Pers Med Brief Report Breast-Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare low-incidence type of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, arising in the capsule around breast implants, and predominantly associated with the use of macro-textured breast implants. The purpose of this study was to use an evidence-based approach to systematically identify clinical studies comparing smooth and textured breast implants in women with regard to the risk of developing BIA-ALCL. Methods: A literature search in PubMed in April 2023 and the article reference list of the French National Agency of Medicine and Health Products decision from 2019 were screened for applicable studies. Only clinical studies where the Jones surface classification could be applied (required information: breast implant manufacturer) for comparison of smooth and textured breast implants were considered. Results: From a total of 224 studies, no articles were included due to the lack of fit to the strict inclusion criteria. Conclusions: Based on the scanned and included literature, implant surface types in relation to the incidence of BIA-ALCL were not evaluated in clinical studies and data from evidence-based clinical sources plays a minor to no role in this context. An international database that combines breast implant-related data from (national, opt-out) medical device registries is, therefore, the best available option to obtain relevant long-term breast implant surveillance data on BIA-ALCL. MDPI 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10221400/ /pubmed/37240986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050816 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Hecker, Andrzej
Giese, Barbara
Pignet, Anna-Lisa
Schellnegger, Marlies
Kamolz, Lars-Peter
Lumenta, David Benjamin
Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review
title Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review
title_full Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review
title_short Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review
title_sort textured vs. smooth breast implants using the jones criteria—what is the currently available evidence for bia-alcl?: a systematic review
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240986
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050816
work_keys_str_mv AT heckerandrzej texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview
AT giesebarbara texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview
AT pignetannalisa texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview
AT schellneggermarlies texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview
AT kamolzlarspeter texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview
AT lumentadavidbenjamin texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview