Cargando…
Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review
Breast-Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare low-incidence type of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, arising in the capsule around breast implants, and predominantly associated with the use of macro-textured breast implants. The purpose of this study was to use an evidenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050816 |
_version_ | 1785049447063879680 |
---|---|
author | Hecker, Andrzej Giese, Barbara Pignet, Anna-Lisa Schellnegger, Marlies Kamolz, Lars-Peter Lumenta, David Benjamin |
author_facet | Hecker, Andrzej Giese, Barbara Pignet, Anna-Lisa Schellnegger, Marlies Kamolz, Lars-Peter Lumenta, David Benjamin |
author_sort | Hecker, Andrzej |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast-Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare low-incidence type of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, arising in the capsule around breast implants, and predominantly associated with the use of macro-textured breast implants. The purpose of this study was to use an evidence-based approach to systematically identify clinical studies comparing smooth and textured breast implants in women with regard to the risk of developing BIA-ALCL. Methods: A literature search in PubMed in April 2023 and the article reference list of the French National Agency of Medicine and Health Products decision from 2019 were screened for applicable studies. Only clinical studies where the Jones surface classification could be applied (required information: breast implant manufacturer) for comparison of smooth and textured breast implants were considered. Results: From a total of 224 studies, no articles were included due to the lack of fit to the strict inclusion criteria. Conclusions: Based on the scanned and included literature, implant surface types in relation to the incidence of BIA-ALCL were not evaluated in clinical studies and data from evidence-based clinical sources plays a minor to no role in this context. An international database that combines breast implant-related data from (national, opt-out) medical device registries is, therefore, the best available option to obtain relevant long-term breast implant surveillance data on BIA-ALCL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10221400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102214002023-05-28 Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review Hecker, Andrzej Giese, Barbara Pignet, Anna-Lisa Schellnegger, Marlies Kamolz, Lars-Peter Lumenta, David Benjamin J Pers Med Brief Report Breast-Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare low-incidence type of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, arising in the capsule around breast implants, and predominantly associated with the use of macro-textured breast implants. The purpose of this study was to use an evidence-based approach to systematically identify clinical studies comparing smooth and textured breast implants in women with regard to the risk of developing BIA-ALCL. Methods: A literature search in PubMed in April 2023 and the article reference list of the French National Agency of Medicine and Health Products decision from 2019 were screened for applicable studies. Only clinical studies where the Jones surface classification could be applied (required information: breast implant manufacturer) for comparison of smooth and textured breast implants were considered. Results: From a total of 224 studies, no articles were included due to the lack of fit to the strict inclusion criteria. Conclusions: Based on the scanned and included literature, implant surface types in relation to the incidence of BIA-ALCL were not evaluated in clinical studies and data from evidence-based clinical sources plays a minor to no role in this context. An international database that combines breast implant-related data from (national, opt-out) medical device registries is, therefore, the best available option to obtain relevant long-term breast implant surveillance data on BIA-ALCL. MDPI 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10221400/ /pubmed/37240986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050816 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Hecker, Andrzej Giese, Barbara Pignet, Anna-Lisa Schellnegger, Marlies Kamolz, Lars-Peter Lumenta, David Benjamin Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review |
title | Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria—What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | textured vs. smooth breast implants using the jones criteria—what is the currently available evidence for bia-alcl?: a systematic review |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heckerandrzej texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview AT giesebarbara texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview AT pignetannalisa texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview AT schellneggermarlies texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview AT kamolzlarspeter texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview AT lumentadavidbenjamin texturedvssmoothbreastimplantsusingthejonescriteriawhatisthecurrentlyavailableevidenceforbiaalclasystematicreview |