Cargando…

The Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Research Evidence to Health and Social Care Practitioners: Protocol for a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Effective dissemination of research to health and social care practitioners enhances clinical practice and evidence-based care. Social media use has potential to facilitate dissemination to busy practitioners. OBJECTIVE: This is a protocol for a systematic review that will quantitatively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts-Lewis, Sarah F, Baxter, Helen A, Mein, Gill, Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia, Leggat, Fiona J, Garner, Hannah M, Powell, Martha, White, Sarah, Bearne, Lindsay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37171840
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/45684
_version_ 1785049478423642112
author Roberts-Lewis, Sarah F
Baxter, Helen A
Mein, Gill
Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia
Leggat, Fiona J
Garner, Hannah M
Powell, Martha
White, Sarah
Bearne, Lindsay
author_facet Roberts-Lewis, Sarah F
Baxter, Helen A
Mein, Gill
Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia
Leggat, Fiona J
Garner, Hannah M
Powell, Martha
White, Sarah
Bearne, Lindsay
author_sort Roberts-Lewis, Sarah F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective dissemination of research to health and social care practitioners enhances clinical practice and evidence-based care. Social media use has potential to facilitate dissemination to busy practitioners. OBJECTIVE: This is a protocol for a systematic review that will quantitatively synthesize evidence of the effectiveness of social media, compared with no social media, for dissemination of research evidence to health and social care practitioners. Social media platforms, formats, and sharing mechanisms used for effective dissemination of research evidence will also be identified and compared. METHODS: Electronic database searches (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, LISTA, and OpenGrey) will be conducted from January 1, 2010, to January 10, 2023, for studies published in English. Randomized, nonrandomized, pre-post study designs or case studies evaluating the effect of social media on dissemination of research evidence to postregistration health and social care practitioners will be included. Studies that do not involve social media or dissemination or those that evaluate dissemination of nonresearch information (eg, multisource educational materials) to students or members of the public only, or without quantitative data on outcomes of interest, will be excluded. Screening will be carried out by 2 independent reviewers. Data extraction and quality assessment, using either the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, will be completed by 2 independent reviewers. Outcomes of interest will be reported in 4 domains (reach, engagement, dissemination, and impact). Data synthesis will include quantitative comparisons using narrative text, tables, and figures. A meta-analysis of standardized pooled effects will be undertaken, and subgroup analyses will be applied, if appropriate. RESULTS: Searches and screening will be completed by the end of May 2023. Data extraction and analyses will be completed by the end of July 2023, after which findings will be synthesized and reported by the end of October 2023. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review will summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of social media for the dissemination of research evidence to health and social care practitioners. The limitations of the evidence may include multiple outcomes or methodological heterogeneity that limit meta-analyses, potential risk of bias in included studies, and potential publication bias. The limitations of the study design may include potential insensitivity of the electronic database search strategy. The findings from this review will inform the dissemination practice of health and care research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022378793; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=378793 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/45684
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10221530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102215302023-05-28 The Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Research Evidence to Health and Social Care Practitioners: Protocol for a Systematic Review Roberts-Lewis, Sarah F Baxter, Helen A Mein, Gill Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia Leggat, Fiona J Garner, Hannah M Powell, Martha White, Sarah Bearne, Lindsay JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Effective dissemination of research to health and social care practitioners enhances clinical practice and evidence-based care. Social media use has potential to facilitate dissemination to busy practitioners. OBJECTIVE: This is a protocol for a systematic review that will quantitatively synthesize evidence of the effectiveness of social media, compared with no social media, for dissemination of research evidence to health and social care practitioners. Social media platforms, formats, and sharing mechanisms used for effective dissemination of research evidence will also be identified and compared. METHODS: Electronic database searches (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, LISTA, and OpenGrey) will be conducted from January 1, 2010, to January 10, 2023, for studies published in English. Randomized, nonrandomized, pre-post study designs or case studies evaluating the effect of social media on dissemination of research evidence to postregistration health and social care practitioners will be included. Studies that do not involve social media or dissemination or those that evaluate dissemination of nonresearch information (eg, multisource educational materials) to students or members of the public only, or without quantitative data on outcomes of interest, will be excluded. Screening will be carried out by 2 independent reviewers. Data extraction and quality assessment, using either the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, will be completed by 2 independent reviewers. Outcomes of interest will be reported in 4 domains (reach, engagement, dissemination, and impact). Data synthesis will include quantitative comparisons using narrative text, tables, and figures. A meta-analysis of standardized pooled effects will be undertaken, and subgroup analyses will be applied, if appropriate. RESULTS: Searches and screening will be completed by the end of May 2023. Data extraction and analyses will be completed by the end of July 2023, after which findings will be synthesized and reported by the end of October 2023. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review will summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of social media for the dissemination of research evidence to health and social care practitioners. The limitations of the evidence may include multiple outcomes or methodological heterogeneity that limit meta-analyses, potential risk of bias in included studies, and potential publication bias. The limitations of the study design may include potential insensitivity of the electronic database search strategy. The findings from this review will inform the dissemination practice of health and care research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022378793; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=378793 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/45684 JMIR Publications 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10221530/ /pubmed/37171840 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/45684 Text en ©Sarah F Roberts-Lewis, Helen A Baxter, Gill Mein, Sophia Quirke-McFarlane, Fiona J Leggat, Hannah M Garner, Martha Powell, Sarah White, Lindsay Bearne. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 12.05.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Roberts-Lewis, Sarah F
Baxter, Helen A
Mein, Gill
Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia
Leggat, Fiona J
Garner, Hannah M
Powell, Martha
White, Sarah
Bearne, Lindsay
The Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Research Evidence to Health and Social Care Practitioners: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title The Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Research Evidence to Health and Social Care Practitioners: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_full The Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Research Evidence to Health and Social Care Practitioners: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Research Evidence to Health and Social Care Practitioners: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Research Evidence to Health and Social Care Practitioners: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_short The Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Research Evidence to Health and Social Care Practitioners: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_sort use of social media for dissemination of research evidence to health and social care practitioners: protocol for a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37171840
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/45684
work_keys_str_mv AT robertslewissarahf theuseofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT baxterhelena theuseofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT meingill theuseofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT quirkemcfarlanesophia theuseofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT leggatfionaj theuseofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT garnerhannahm theuseofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT powellmartha theuseofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT whitesarah theuseofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT bearnelindsay theuseofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT robertslewissarahf useofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT baxterhelena useofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT meingill useofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT quirkemcfarlanesophia useofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT leggatfionaj useofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT garnerhannahm useofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT powellmartha useofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT whitesarah useofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT bearnelindsay useofsocialmediafordisseminationofresearchevidencetohealthandsocialcarepractitionersprotocolforasystematicreview