Cargando…

Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal

Background. Meal ingestion induces a postprandial experience that involves homeostatic and hedonic sensations. Our aim was to determine the effect of aversive conditioning on the postprandial reward of a comfort meal. Methods: A sham-controlled, randomised, parallel, single-blind study was performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieto, Adoracion, Livovsky, Dan M., Azpiroz, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37242129
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15102247
_version_ 1785049491543425024
author Nieto, Adoracion
Livovsky, Dan M.
Azpiroz, Fernando
author_facet Nieto, Adoracion
Livovsky, Dan M.
Azpiroz, Fernando
author_sort Nieto, Adoracion
collection PubMed
description Background. Meal ingestion induces a postprandial experience that involves homeostatic and hedonic sensations. Our aim was to determine the effect of aversive conditioning on the postprandial reward of a comfort meal. Methods: A sham-controlled, randomised, parallel, single-blind study was performed on 12 healthy women (6 per group). A comfort meal was tested before and after coupling the meal with an aversive sensation (conditioning intervention), induced by infusion of lipids via a thin naso-duodenal catheter; in the pre- and post-conditioning tests and in the control group, a sham infusion was performed. Participants were instructed that two recipes of a tasty humus would be tested; however, the same meal was administered with a colour additive in the conditioning and post-conditioning tests. Digestive well-being (primary outcome) was measured every 10 min before and 60 min after ingestion using graded scales. Results: In the aversive conditioning group, the comfort meal in the pre-conditioning test induced a pleasant postprandial experience, which was significantly lower in the post-conditioning test; the effect of aversive conditioning (change from pre- to post-conditioning) was significant as compared to sham conditioning in the control group, which showed no differences between study days. Conclusion: The hedonic postprandial response to a comfort meal in healthy women is impaired by aversive conditioning. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04938934.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10221585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102215852023-05-28 Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal Nieto, Adoracion Livovsky, Dan M. Azpiroz, Fernando Nutrients Article Background. Meal ingestion induces a postprandial experience that involves homeostatic and hedonic sensations. Our aim was to determine the effect of aversive conditioning on the postprandial reward of a comfort meal. Methods: A sham-controlled, randomised, parallel, single-blind study was performed on 12 healthy women (6 per group). A comfort meal was tested before and after coupling the meal with an aversive sensation (conditioning intervention), induced by infusion of lipids via a thin naso-duodenal catheter; in the pre- and post-conditioning tests and in the control group, a sham infusion was performed. Participants were instructed that two recipes of a tasty humus would be tested; however, the same meal was administered with a colour additive in the conditioning and post-conditioning tests. Digestive well-being (primary outcome) was measured every 10 min before and 60 min after ingestion using graded scales. Results: In the aversive conditioning group, the comfort meal in the pre-conditioning test induced a pleasant postprandial experience, which was significantly lower in the post-conditioning test; the effect of aversive conditioning (change from pre- to post-conditioning) was significant as compared to sham conditioning in the control group, which showed no differences between study days. Conclusion: The hedonic postprandial response to a comfort meal in healthy women is impaired by aversive conditioning. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04938934. MDPI 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10221585/ /pubmed/37242129 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15102247 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nieto, Adoracion
Livovsky, Dan M.
Azpiroz, Fernando
Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_full Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_fullStr Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_full_unstemmed Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_short Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_sort conditioning by a previous experience impairs the rewarding value of a comfort meal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37242129
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15102247
work_keys_str_mv AT nietoadoracion conditioningbyapreviousexperienceimpairstherewardingvalueofacomfortmeal
AT livovskydanm conditioningbyapreviousexperienceimpairstherewardingvalueofacomfortmeal
AT azpirozfernando conditioningbyapreviousexperienceimpairstherewardingvalueofacomfortmeal