Cargando…

An Overview of Modeling Approaches for Compositional Control in III–V Ternary Nanowires

Modeling of the growth process is required for the synthesis of III–V ternary nanowires with controllable composition. Consequently, new theoretical approaches for the description of epitaxial growth and the related chemical composition of III–V ternary nanowires based on group III or group V interm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leshchenko, Egor D., Dubrovskii, Vladimir G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37242075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13101659
_version_ 1785049497318981632
author Leshchenko, Egor D.
Dubrovskii, Vladimir G.
author_facet Leshchenko, Egor D.
Dubrovskii, Vladimir G.
author_sort Leshchenko, Egor D.
collection PubMed
description Modeling of the growth process is required for the synthesis of III–V ternary nanowires with controllable composition. Consequently, new theoretical approaches for the description of epitaxial growth and the related chemical composition of III–V ternary nanowires based on group III or group V intermix were recently developed. In this review, we present and discuss existing modeling strategies for the stationary compositions of III–V ternary nanowires and try to systematize and link them in a general perspective. In particular, we divide the existing approaches into models that focus on the liquid–solid incorporation mechanisms in vapor–liquid–solid nanowires (equilibrium, nucleation-limited, and kinetic models treating the growth of solid from liquid) and models that provide the vapor–solid distributions (empirical, transport-limited, reaction-limited, and kinetic models treating the growth of solid from vapor). We describe the basic ideas underlying the existing models and analyze the similarities and differences between them, as well as the limitations and key factors influencing the stationary compositions of III–V nanowires versus the growth method. Overall, this review provides a basis for choosing a modeling approach that is most appropriate for a particular material system and epitaxy technique and that underlines the achieved level of the compositional modeling of III–V ternary nanowires and the remaining gaps that require further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10221609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102216092023-05-28 An Overview of Modeling Approaches for Compositional Control in III–V Ternary Nanowires Leshchenko, Egor D. Dubrovskii, Vladimir G. Nanomaterials (Basel) Review Modeling of the growth process is required for the synthesis of III–V ternary nanowires with controllable composition. Consequently, new theoretical approaches for the description of epitaxial growth and the related chemical composition of III–V ternary nanowires based on group III or group V intermix were recently developed. In this review, we present and discuss existing modeling strategies for the stationary compositions of III–V ternary nanowires and try to systematize and link them in a general perspective. In particular, we divide the existing approaches into models that focus on the liquid–solid incorporation mechanisms in vapor–liquid–solid nanowires (equilibrium, nucleation-limited, and kinetic models treating the growth of solid from liquid) and models that provide the vapor–solid distributions (empirical, transport-limited, reaction-limited, and kinetic models treating the growth of solid from vapor). We describe the basic ideas underlying the existing models and analyze the similarities and differences between them, as well as the limitations and key factors influencing the stationary compositions of III–V nanowires versus the growth method. Overall, this review provides a basis for choosing a modeling approach that is most appropriate for a particular material system and epitaxy technique and that underlines the achieved level of the compositional modeling of III–V ternary nanowires and the remaining gaps that require further studies. MDPI 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10221609/ /pubmed/37242075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13101659 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Leshchenko, Egor D.
Dubrovskii, Vladimir G.
An Overview of Modeling Approaches for Compositional Control in III–V Ternary Nanowires
title An Overview of Modeling Approaches for Compositional Control in III–V Ternary Nanowires
title_full An Overview of Modeling Approaches for Compositional Control in III–V Ternary Nanowires
title_fullStr An Overview of Modeling Approaches for Compositional Control in III–V Ternary Nanowires
title_full_unstemmed An Overview of Modeling Approaches for Compositional Control in III–V Ternary Nanowires
title_short An Overview of Modeling Approaches for Compositional Control in III–V Ternary Nanowires
title_sort overview of modeling approaches for compositional control in iii–v ternary nanowires
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37242075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13101659
work_keys_str_mv AT leshchenkoegord anoverviewofmodelingapproachesforcompositionalcontroliniiivternarynanowires
AT dubrovskiivladimirg anoverviewofmodelingapproachesforcompositionalcontroliniiivternarynanowires
AT leshchenkoegord overviewofmodelingapproachesforcompositionalcontroliniiivternarynanowires
AT dubrovskiivladimirg overviewofmodelingapproachesforcompositionalcontroliniiivternarynanowires