Cargando…

Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Cannabis use by physicians can be detrimental for them and their patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of cannabis use by medical doctors (MDs)/students. Method: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo and ScienceDirect were searched for studies report...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naillon, Pierre-Louis, Flaudias, Valentin, Brousse, Georges, Laporte, Catherine, Baker, Julien S., Brusseau, Valentin, Comptour, Aurélie, Zak, Marek, Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste, Dutheil, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37233605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicines10050029
_version_ 1785049519541452800
author Naillon, Pierre-Louis
Flaudias, Valentin
Brousse, Georges
Laporte, Catherine
Baker, Julien S.
Brusseau, Valentin
Comptour, Aurélie
Zak, Marek
Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste
Dutheil, Frédéric
author_facet Naillon, Pierre-Louis
Flaudias, Valentin
Brousse, Georges
Laporte, Catherine
Baker, Julien S.
Brusseau, Valentin
Comptour, Aurélie
Zak, Marek
Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste
Dutheil, Frédéric
author_sort Naillon, Pierre-Louis
collection PubMed
description Background: Cannabis use by physicians can be detrimental for them and their patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of cannabis use by medical doctors (MDs)/students. Method: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo and ScienceDirect were searched for studies reporting cannabis use in MDs/students. For each frequency of use (lifetime/past year/past month/daily), we stratified a random effect meta-analysis depending on specialties, education level, continents, and periods of time, which were further compared using meta-regressions. Results: We included 54 studies with a total of 42,936 MDs/students: 20,267 MDs, 20,063 medical students, and 1976 residents. Overall, 37% had used cannabis at least once over their lifetime, 14% over the past year, 8% over the past month and 1.1 per thousand (‰) had a daily use. Medical students had a greater cannabis use than MDs over their lifetime (38% vs. 35%, p < 0.001), the past year (24% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), and the past month (10% vs. 2%, p < 0.05), without significance for daily use (0.5% vs. 0.05%, NS). Insufficient data precluded comparisons among medical specialties. MDs/students from Asian countries seemed to have the lowest cannabis use: 16% over their lifetime, 10% in the past year, 1% in the past month, and 0.4% daily. Regarding periods of time, cannabis use seems to follow a U-shape, with a high use before 1990, followed by a decrease between 1990 and 2005, and a rebound after 2005. Younger and male MDs/students had the highest cannabis use. Conclusions: If more than a third of MDs tried cannabis at least once in their lifetime, this means its daily use is low but not uncommon (1.1‰). Medical students are the biggest cannabis users. Despite being common worldwide, cannabis use is predominant in the West, with a rebound since 2005 making salient those public health interventions during the early stage of medical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10221702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102217022023-05-28 Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Naillon, Pierre-Louis Flaudias, Valentin Brousse, Georges Laporte, Catherine Baker, Julien S. Brusseau, Valentin Comptour, Aurélie Zak, Marek Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste Dutheil, Frédéric Medicines (Basel) Systematic Review Background: Cannabis use by physicians can be detrimental for them and their patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of cannabis use by medical doctors (MDs)/students. Method: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo and ScienceDirect were searched for studies reporting cannabis use in MDs/students. For each frequency of use (lifetime/past year/past month/daily), we stratified a random effect meta-analysis depending on specialties, education level, continents, and periods of time, which were further compared using meta-regressions. Results: We included 54 studies with a total of 42,936 MDs/students: 20,267 MDs, 20,063 medical students, and 1976 residents. Overall, 37% had used cannabis at least once over their lifetime, 14% over the past year, 8% over the past month and 1.1 per thousand (‰) had a daily use. Medical students had a greater cannabis use than MDs over their lifetime (38% vs. 35%, p < 0.001), the past year (24% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), and the past month (10% vs. 2%, p < 0.05), without significance for daily use (0.5% vs. 0.05%, NS). Insufficient data precluded comparisons among medical specialties. MDs/students from Asian countries seemed to have the lowest cannabis use: 16% over their lifetime, 10% in the past year, 1% in the past month, and 0.4% daily. Regarding periods of time, cannabis use seems to follow a U-shape, with a high use before 1990, followed by a decrease between 1990 and 2005, and a rebound after 2005. Younger and male MDs/students had the highest cannabis use. Conclusions: If more than a third of MDs tried cannabis at least once in their lifetime, this means its daily use is low but not uncommon (1.1‰). Medical students are the biggest cannabis users. Despite being common worldwide, cannabis use is predominant in the West, with a rebound since 2005 making salient those public health interventions during the early stage of medical studies. MDPI 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10221702/ /pubmed/37233605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicines10050029 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Naillon, Pierre-Louis
Flaudias, Valentin
Brousse, Georges
Laporte, Catherine
Baker, Julien S.
Brusseau, Valentin
Comptour, Aurélie
Zak, Marek
Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste
Dutheil, Frédéric
Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort cannabis use in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37233605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicines10050029
work_keys_str_mv AT naillonpierrelouis cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT flaudiasvalentin cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT broussegeorges cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT laportecatherine cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bakerjuliens cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brusseauvalentin cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT comptouraurelie cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zakmarek cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bouillonminoisjeanbaptiste cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dutheilfrederic cannabisuseinphysiciansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis